Greens want to “maximise” FTTP, says Ludlam



news Greens Communications Spokesperson Scott Ludlam has accused the Coalition Government of ‘pulling the plug’ on Labor’s National Broadband Network project and leaving Australians “stranded” on legacy copper infrastructure. In comparison, Ludlam said, the Greens were focused on “maximising the amount of optic fiber laid directly to premises”.

In early December last year, the National Broadband Network Company released its Strategic Review report into the current status of its network rollout and options for modifying the rollout to better meet the Coalition’s policy aims of delivering download speeds of between 25Mbps and 100Mbps to most Australians by the end of 2016 and 50Mbps to 100Mbps by the end of 2019.

The report found that it will not be possible to deliver the Coalition’s stated policy goal of delivering broadband speeds of 25Mbps to all Australians by the end of 2016 or at the projected cost, and has recommended that NBN Co cancel any new network rollout to up to a third of Australian premises already covered by existing HFC cable networks. It also recommended that a sizable proportion of the remaining premises would be covered by a Fibre to the Node rollout, with about a quarter of premises to received the original Fibre to the Premises model preferred by the previous Labor administration. This model is known as the ‘Multi-Technology Mix’ option.

The development of this model, with its reliance on technologies inferior to Labor’s previous Fibre to the Premises model has come despite the fact that even senior NBN Co executives have acknowledged that some of the technology featured in the MTM model will need upgrading in only a few year’s time. Fundamental fixed-line telecommunications infrastructure is typically deployed with the intention that it will last for decades.

The model has attracted significant criticism, even from commentators which had previously been broadly positive about the Coalition’s policy. Telecommunications analyst Paul Budde has described the MTM model as a “dog’s breakfast” which would be hard to implement, and ISP iiNet has described the debate on the issue as lacking long-term vision.

“I see the Greens’ role as to salvaging as much as possible from the wreckage by maximising the amount of optic fiber laid directly to premises. I strongly encourage people to make their concerns heard directly with their Liberal and National MPs,” said Ludlam in a statement issued yesterday to coincide with a visit of the Senate’s NBN Committee to Western Australia.

“There is no reason why WA has to miss out and be subjected to broadband dropouts just because the Abbott Government doesn’t have the foresight to install a world class telecommunications network.”

Scott Ludlam said people across the state would be stranded on the obsolete copper telephone network under the current plan advanced by Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

“Farmers, regional architects, designers and software developers in WA could have been conducting business with people across the world with fast broadband,” the Greens Senator said. “But huge sections of the metro area suffer sub-standard telecommunications, and Abbott’s solution is to pull the plug.”

Ludlam said that after the 2010 election, then-opposition leader Abbott instructed Turnbull to “demolish” the NBN, which resulted in the current plan to buy and then maintain Telstra’s patched and outdated copper network. In an earlier hearing, Ludlam said the committee was shown evidence of the degree to which copper cables are spliced together with duct tape and plastic bags.

Ludlam is correct that the Coalition’s current NBN plan will see substantial portions of Telstra’s existing copper network reused.

However, the Senator’s implication — that the network is not capable of providing high-speed broadband services — is incorrect. Across Europe and throughout the United States, copper networks, in a Fibre to the Node model, are being used to provide high-speed broadband. news British incumbent telco BT revealed in July, for example, that its fibre to the node network has passed more than 16 million premises since the network rollout was commenced in 2009, with more than 1.7 million customers having signed up for active connections to the infrastructure.

However, the proposed re-use of the HFC cable networks of Telstra and Optus — a model which was not contained in the Coalition’s initial broadband policy released last April — is seen as a larger issue for the MTM model. The networks are currently owned by Telstra and Optus, and it is not clear how or at what price NBN Co would buy the networks or gain access to them. In addition, it is not clear whether it is technically possible for such networks to be opened for wholesale access. This model is very rare globally.

Globally, the standard upgrade path for national broadband networks currently involves the split of incumbent telcos’ retail and wholesale operations, followed by government efforts to incentivise the wholesale divisions to upgrade their networks. This is the model being pursued in countries such as New Zealand and the UK, and similar models are being used throughout other countries in Europe.

Image credit: Office of Scott Ludlam


  1. It seems that Ludlam is going to campaign hard on the NBN issue if the WA Senate result is thrown out by the High Court.

    And so he should – he’s got a reasonably good track record there, and the level of public dissatisfaction with the Abbott gov’t wrecking ball anything-but-what-Labor-did approach is high.

  2. “However, the Senator’s implication — that the network is not capable of providing high-speed broadband services — is incorrect. ”

    I have no idea how you worked out that this is his implication, his quote is

    “There is no reason why WA has to miss out and be subjected to broadband dropouts just because the Abbott Government doesn’t have the foresight to install a world class telecommunications network.”

    Which indicates he is talking about RELIABILITY not speed. If you are referring to a previous comment of senator ludlum you should quote it, his press release (below) only cites that WA will not receive a world class network and that it will be stuck on unreliable copper both of those assertions are 100% correct.

  3. Abott and Turnbull know exactly what they are doing and it’s not to serve the public interest. This is turning out to be one if the most corrupt acts in Australia’s history!

  4. That’s why its called fraudband with emphasis on the FRAUD. I agree with your conclusion ” This is turning out to be one if the most corrupt acts in Australia’s history! “

    • How so?

      The LNP went to the election saying they would look at the math. They didn’t promise FTTP or FTTN, just that they would do “something”…

      I dislike the LNP’s plan as much as the next WP adherent, but a lot of the post announcement gnashing of teeth is based on promises that were never made.

      If anything, the sheer lack of reaction to the LNP plan (a petition that didn’t manage to equal Clive Palmer’s portion of the vote, a KS stunt to put an article in MT’s paper that garnered even less support and a march that was shambolic, minuscule and easily ignored) speaks to the fact that apart from technocrats, not exactly a powerful faction in the Aus demographic, few people actually care enough to get worked up about the situation…

      But corruption? /lol Votes of no confidence or double dissolution? Yeah, not likely…

      • “If anything, the sheer lack of reaction to the LNP plan…”

        Err, that’s because people other than those at tech blogs, aren’t being told the truth… in fact they aren’t being told anything at all…

        Had I posted a link to WP anytime prior to the last election the amount of NBN articles from MSM decrying waste etc, would have been many, but look now!

        But having been one of the fervent NBN/FttP detractors yourself, who rolled over… remember when Renai apologised (after seeing this governments woeful SR) glad to see you are again flying the flag that even the other usual suspects no longer do.

        Regardless of the fact that this obvious deep seeded opposition is now much more veiled…

      • I’m looking at the maths in the NBN Strategic Review, 3.5 years of income is missing from the scenario that represents the FTTP proposal, its these years at the end which will produce the largest incomes for that scenario, while the same 3.5 years in the scenario that represents FTTN ( N0 6 ) will have declining revenues.

        Its also NBNs Ziggy Switowski admission that the FTTN scenario 6 can’t guarantee speed/download and it will need to be upgraded or replaced 5 years after completion. Lack of news paper reporting, ask Murdock.

  5. My previous comment not withstanding, it’s good to see Ludlum still fighting the good fight for his electors and Aus in general. How much power he can muster is another matter, but he has been definitely beneficial and a welcome change in the Australian political environment…

  6. Having correctly predicted the Libs would do nothing 2013-16 I now predict they will do a Uturn and, maybe quietly, about the middle of this year start running out fibre and a bit quicker than the present artificially slow rate.

    The reason? 4K TV prices are tumbling but the first few thousand will be wealthier people—they will start to exert pressure to get FTTH so they can get 4K content.

    May only be rolled out in wealthier suburbs but the more fibre rolled out the harder to sell Fraudband.

    • “Having correctly predicted the Libs would do nothing 2013-16 I now predict they will do a Uturn”

      So you predicted they would do nothing in a 3 year period, and now only 4 months into that 3 years (since taking office), you are now saying they are going to do a complete u-turn and do something.

      Wow. Just wow! You are in some serious denial there mate.

Comments are closed.