• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Digital Rights, Featured, News - Written by on Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:29 - 8 Comments

    Snowden an “American traitor”, says Australia’s Attorney-General


    news Federal Attorney-General George Brandis has reacted to the revelation of what a Queen’s Counsel lawyer has stated are borderline illegal surveillance tactics by the Australian Signals Directorate by supporting the agency and accusing NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden of being an “American traitor”.

    Yesterday The Guardian published documents sourced from Snowden which purported to show that the ASD, Australia’s peak electronic intelligence agency, had offered to share detailed information collected about ordinary Australian citizens with its major intelligence partners.

    Subsequently, QC and human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson published an opinionated article arguing that the ASD had broken the law in offering the data to Australia’s international partners. The news has also created outrage in Australia’s digital rights community, with organisations such as the Greens, Electronic Frontiers Australia and the Pirate Party Australia calling for a full-scale parliamentary inquiry into surveillance practices.

    In the Senate yesterday, Brandis took several canned questions on the issue from fellow Liberal Senator David Fawcett.

    “I am aware of reports published this morning by The Guardian Australia which make certain claims about the alleged activities of Australia’s intelligence organisations. Those claims are made on the basis of material placed in the public domain by the American traitor Edward Snowden,” said Brandis.

    “I note that the document of which the report is based is unverified. I also note that the unverified document is described as a draft document, which contrary to all reports, does not report or record any activity by any Australian intelligence agency. It is, as the honourable Senator knows, a long standing practice of successive Australian governments not to comment on intelligence matters.”

    Brandis’ description of Snowden as an “American traitor” appears to be inaccurate. The United States has a very strict definition of treason and rarely charges suspects with the crime, usually preferring instead to focus on other related charges such as sedition or espionage. The country has charged only a handful of people with treason over the past several centuries.

    Snowden has been charged with espionage and theft of government property in the US — but not with treason, according to publicly available information.

    Additionally, much of the international community, and even respected US politicians such as former President Jimmy Carter, have applauded his actions as both patriotic and also serving humanity. In addition, a number of legal challenges have already been mounted to the legitimacy of the spying programs in the US. A number of polls have consistently shown that a large percentage of US citizens actually regard Snowden as a hero.

    The news represents only the latest time that Snowden and other whistleblowers such as Chelsea Manning (formerly Bradley Manning) have had their status questioned by an Australian Attorney-General. In August this year, then-Labor Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus made the extraordinary public statement that former CIA and NSA operative Edward Snowden and accused WikiLeaks collaborator Bradley Manning are not technically “whistleblowers”, claiming that the information they had released publicly related to no wrongdoing by government agencies.

    Backing the intelligence agencies
    In the Senate yesterday, Brandis further stated that Australian intelligence agencies operated under a strong framework of legislation, parliamentary, ministerial and executive oversight.

    “The legislative framework is provided for by the Intelligence Services Act and the ASIO Act,” the Attorney-General said. “Those acts were reviewed in 2011 by the Independent Review of the Intelligence Community which reaffirmed that the legal framework is sound and enshrines an appropriate balance between our security and safeguards for our privacy.”

    “The honourable Senator would also be aware that there is a strong framework of parliamentary oversight both through the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Intelligence and Security and the Senate Select Committee on Defence and Foreign Affairs in particular. As well there is ministerial oversight through the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security.”

    Delimiter contacted the Office of the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security yesterday to ask whether it would open an inquiry into The Guardian’s revelations. However no response has yet been received from the Inspector-General.

    Spurred by Fawcett, Brandis further defended Australia’s intelligence community in the Senate. “The purpose of all of Australia’s intelligence activities and the operation of its intelligence agenciesis to serve Australia’s national interests and protect Australian citizens,” the Attorney-General said.

    “And can I, by way of illustration, point out to the honourable Senator that Australian authorities have disrupted terrorist planning in Australia and thwarted a number of mass casualty attacks. As a result of their activities, 23 people have been convicted of terrorism offences in Australia in the last four years.”

    “Australia’s intelligence has also helped to prevent at least four attacks in South East Asia in the last decade and contributed to the arrest within South East Asia of over 20 terrorists.” “The Government is confident, Mr President, that the Australian intelligence agencies act in accordance with the law and always to the service of the national interest.”

    Prime Minister Tony Abbott also backed Australia’s intelligence agencies, stating in a separate press conference that he had no evidence they acted outside the law, arguing that “stringent” safeguards worked to prevent surveillance overreach.

    Image credit: Screenshot of the film Prism by Praxis Films, believed to be OK to use under fair use

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Posted 03/12/2013 at 11:19 am | Permalink | Reply

      Mr Brandis fails to recognize that just because they may have caught terrorists with these powers in place doesn’t mean that the agencies are not abusing the powers or going outside the law.

      Scott Ludlam and others are not arguing that we shouldn’t have spying agencies. They’re saying that they have gone too far and need more oversight.

    2. Kevin Cobley
      Posted 03/12/2013 at 1:18 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Intelligence agencies don’t have much intelligence.
      Brandis has got nothing between his ears, spends too much time building bookshelves and not enough time reading.

    3. Alex
      Posted 03/12/2013 at 1:19 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Snowden is a top bloke and everyone should hold him with the highest regard.

      These leaks just show how much the establishment cares about itself and not about us.

    4. John
      Posted 03/12/2013 at 2:00 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Wow… pot calling the kettle black big time, its also being a traitor selling your own countrymen out, but the AG probably won’t see things that way.

    5. The12thMan
      Posted 03/12/2013 at 2:49 pm | Permalink | Reply

      He is an American traitor.

      American. Check.

      He betrayed his nation by stealing classified documents and defecting to Russia, which documents could clearly aid the enemies of the US. Traitor. Check.

      They probably have just charged him with the simple stuff for now. They’ll work out the details later.

      • PeterA
        Posted 04/12/2013 at 9:13 am | Permalink | Reply

        He did the opposite of betray his country.
        He did betray his government, but they had already abused their own laws, betraying their citizens.

        Is the us government a traitor to its own people then according to you?

    6. Lachlan
      Posted 03/12/2013 at 3:10 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Interesting response by George Brandis. By marginalising Snowden he isn’t doing a particularly good job of building the Australian public’s trust in our own security agencies.

      It wouldn’t be a problem if the government were more transparent and not asking us for trust.

    7. Matthew
      Posted 06/12/2013 at 11:37 am | Permalink | Reply

      What I dont get is why he even feels the desire to take a stance against Snowden

    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights