• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Reviews - Written by on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 15:52 - 9 Comments

    Samsung Galaxy Note II: Preview

    preview Samsung’s latest attempt to merge stylus computing with a smartphone comes across as a marriage between the original Galaxy Note and its extremely popular Galaxy S III. But does this ‘phablet’ device bridge the gap between phone and tablet well, or is it a misshapen monstrosity? Read on to find out.

    Note: This article represents an advanced look at the design, features and likely performance of this product, but we haven’t tested it yet. A follow-up full review will be published when we have.

    The weird thing about the Galaxy Note II is that you can’t help but feel as though you’ve seen it before somewhere, but slimmer. It’s as though that attractive person from your office went on holiday for a while and let their fitness go, coming back slightly out of shape and with a little pudge. It’s a little weird, but you still like the way it looks overall, right?

    This is because the Galaxy Note II takes much more of a design cue from Samsung’s highly popular Galaxy S III line than its previous generation Galaxy Note model. The Galaxy Note II has most of the same bits and pieces as the Galaxy S III – the volume rocker is still on the left-hand side, the same physical button sits below the touchscreen, and the same power button sits on the right-hand side, and its design appears similar, with a smooth plastic back surrounded by a metallic rim, but overall the Galaxy Note II has a slightly ‘fatter’ feel compared with the Galaxy S III. It’s as though it’s been upsized.

    And, to be honest, this is a really good thing. We wrote about the original Galaxy S III:

    “Two things are immediately apparent with respect to the Galaxy S III’s design aesthetic when you pick it up. Firstly, this is a phone which absolutely screams “build quality”. Every single edge has been polished and smoothed, every component is integrated perfectly into its neighbour, and overall you just feel like you’re holding something special. Amongst smartphone manufacturers, we’ve really only seen a couple that are able to achieve this level of design; Apple being the most noteworthy, alongside Nokia and perhaps HTC. This is the goods when it comes to smartphone build quality, and when your friends and family pick up your Galaxy S III they’ll notice it’s something special.

    Secondly, there is the screen. At 4.8″, the GS3′s screen is one of the largest on the market, although not quite as large as the jumbo 5.3″ model on its sister phone, the Galaxy Note. If you hold the GS3 next to almost any other recently popular smartphone (for example, the iPhone 4S or HTC Sensation), you’ll notice just how large the GS3′s screen is. This is also emphasised by the fact that there isn’t a lot of wasted space around the screen. On the front of the GS3, almost all of the space is taken up by the screen, with everything else being a secondary concern. Buttons? Why do we need buttons? We’ve got a huge whopping beautiful touchscreen!”

    The Galaxy Note II is essentially that same smartphone, but its screen has been upsized, from 4.8” to 5.5”. Unfortunately, this hasn’t translated into a different screen resolution – both models share the same 1280×720 screen resolution. So you won’t actually get any extra screen real estate on the Galaxy Note II compared with the Galaxy S III, and we were already pretty happy with how the screen resolution matched up with the Galaxy S III’s screen. But it does mean that screen elements on the Galaxy Note II will be bigger, if you’re into that kind of thing. Frankly … we’re not. Why buy a larger smartphone screen if you don’t get a bigger resolution to use it with? It doesn’t make much sense to us.

    Unfortunately this increased size means that the Galaxy Note II is also heavier and slightly thicker than the Galaxy S III. It weighs 180g, compared with the Galaxy S III’s 133g, and it measures 9.4mm thick, compared with the Galaxy S III’s 8.6mm. It’s 80.5mm by 151.1mm, compared with the Galaxy S III’s 70.6mm by 136.6mm. We expect users won’t be worried with the extra girth of the Galaxy Note II – they know they’re buying a bigger model – but the 180g weight is getting to a level where some will find it a little annoying to keep in their pocket.

    The other major design difference between the Galaxy S III and the Galaxy Note II is the included stylus pen, which one of the Galaxy Note II’s major drawcards. We’re not a huge fan of using a stylus for any device (the iPhone spoiled that for us), but we have spoken to quite a few people who find this kind of input indispensible, including quite a few smartphone buyers from Australia’s Asian business community, medical professionals, artists and so on. Steve Jobs might not believe in styluses, but there are certainly people out there who do.

    On the Galaxy Note II, the included stylus (or, as Samsung would have us call it, the ‘S-pen’), slots into a little hole on the bottom right of the smartphone when it’s not being used.

    As with its design, the Galaxy Note II contains many of the same specifications as the Galaxy S III, but with some notable additions and improvements. For starters, it features an upgraded 1.6GHz quad-core processor (it’s Samsung’s Exynos model). And unlike the original Galaxy S III, it also supports the LTE standard for access to 4G mobile networks. We don’t yet know whether the Galaxy Note II will support the 1800Mhz spectrum used by Telstra and Optus in Australia for their mobile networks, but given that the 4G version of the Galaxy S III does, it seems a safe bet.

    The Galaxy Note II comes in three models with different amounts of internal storage – 16GB, 32GB and 64GB – and like the Galaxy S III, it comes with a microSD card, which can take up to 64GB of additional storage. Its front camera is a 1.9 megapixel model – a more than decent rating for a front-facing smartphone camera – and its rear model is an eight megapixel model, which looks to be the same one that’s in the Galaxy S III. The back camera is also capable of shooting video at 1080p. 2GB of RAM is included.

    Two other upgrades to the Galaxy Note II will be of prime importance. Firstly, it has a whopping battery, at 3100mAh, and it’s removable. Despite the larger size of the Note II’s screen, and the fact that it supports 4G speeds (both of which are battery suckers), we can’t help but feel that it’s likely that this is one smartphone which will have decent battery performance.

    Secondly, the Galaxy Note II will come with version 4.1 (Jelly Bean) of Google’s Android operating system. This is very much a good thing. Jelly Bean, with its Project Butter smoothness, represents a real landmark in Google’s development of Android, and we highly recommend adopting it if your smartphone supports it. It’s just so much more polished and developed than the previous version – Ice Cream Sandwich – and we are very much in love with it.

    Apart from this, one other notable feature is the software integration of the Galaxy Note II’s S Pen stylus. One of the big features in this smartphone is the integration of handwriting recognition. And there are a bunch of little niceties associated with this integration – such as a function called Air View, which lets you use the pen without actually touching it to the Galaxy Note II’s screen – you can simply hover it close over it, and it’ll register.

    Obviously we haven’t tested it yet, so it’s hard to predict what the Galaxy Note II’s performance will be like, but the fact that it’s so heavily based on the Galaxy S III gives us a degree of certainty that the Galaxy Note II will perform very strongly in the areas of processor and user interface performance, network access speed and camera. In all of these areas the Galaxy S III is a strong performer.

    What we’ll really be looking to find out through the review process is whether the Galaxy Note’s battery life will perform well, given its larger screen, and how well its S Pen stylus functions on the Galaxy Note II’s screen. The previous Galaxy Note performed OK in this area, but early reviews have been raving about how good the Galaxy Note II’s handwriting recognition is. We know there are quite a lot of people who will be interested in this model if the handwriting recognition is as good as has been reported.

    We really, really liked the Galaxy S III, rating it one of the best handsets, if not the best, available in Australia at the moment. With the Galaxy Note II, Samsung looks to have up-sized this stellar model into the ‘phablet’ zone, adding a stylus and what is rumoured to be strong handwriting recognition to boot. If the battery is strong and the handwriting recognition is as good as people are saying it is – and if the Galaxy Note II supports 4G speeds in Australia – then we reckon Samsung is onto a winner here with certain segments of the population. Not everyone will like this form factor – and it’s not the best for actually making calls. But for those who like this kind of smartphone model, we think this is likely to be one of the best examples of the breed.

    Image credit: Samsung

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. damien
      Posted 16/10/2012 at 5:15 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Quote: “Two things are immediately apparent with respect to the Galaxy S III’s design aesthetic when you pick it up. Firstly, this is a phone which absolutely screams “build quality””.

      Really? Almost every review I’ve ever read mentions how ‘plasticy’ it feels, especially compared to the iPhone (both the GS3 and GN2).

      And the ‘metallic’ rim you mention, is just chrome-look plastic, according to other reviews. You might want to check that when you do a ‘proper’ review.

      • Posted 16/10/2012 at 5:26 pm | Permalink | Reply

        Have you actually played with a Galaxy S III? It feels awesome in the hand — and the build quality is definitely there. I, and most people I know who have played with both, rate it at least on par with, if not better than the iPhone 5 and 4S.

        • James
          Posted 17/10/2012 at 9:45 am | Permalink | Reply

          The plastic cops a lot of flak on internet, but Samsung has done really well to make it feel solid and well built *and* have a removeable battery cover.
          I was pleasantly surprised when I used one for the first time.

          • Posted 17/10/2012 at 10:54 am | Permalink | Reply

            This is why it’s important to do actual testing and reviews of products. I’ve often found that readers had one impression of a piece of technology following what they’d read online, but that this impression didn’t reflect the reality of holding the device in their hand. This also holds very true with video game reviews — the previews we get often don’t show the negative points of the games.

    2. Graham R
      Posted 16/10/2012 at 5:16 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Thanks for the review Renai. The 4G version of this phone might be my next phone. The non 4G version is already available from online dealers like Kogan. Unfortunately the Note 2 uses (like the GS3 but unlike the GS2 and Note 1) a microSIM card %^$#.
      There may be light at the end of the tunnel with rumours of a dual SIM version for the Chinese market which does use a full size SIM card, but that version could exclude other features.
      I wish Samsung and other manufacturers would stop copying Apple – next thing they will start using the ridiculous nanoSIMs like the new iPhone5!
      Yes, I could use a microSIM to SIM card adaptor but have heard they are a bit fiddly and possibly somewhat unreliable – anyone out there using them? Any comments?

      • Posted 16/10/2012 at 5:28 pm | Permalink | Reply


        microSIM isn’t an issue. You can just get your old number ported to a microSIM — your telco will do it for you — or use an adapter, which also work fine.

        Personally I wouldn’t buy a smartphone right now without 4G support — especially if you consider that most people keep their phones for at least a year or so.

        • Graham R
          Posted 16/10/2012 at 5:34 pm | Permalink | Reply

          Yes I know getting a microSIM is no problem, but I want to be able to swap the card in to my old backup phone which uses a full size SIM. With all the manufacturers going to microSIMs it looks like I might have to use an adaptor.

      • Alex
        Posted 17/10/2012 at 8:41 am | Permalink | Reply

        I use a microSIM adapter and it’s fine. Cost $1 for 3 of them on eBay including postage. It is a tiny bit fiddly but unless you’re swapping the card between phones all the time, no big deal.

    3. LaughingBubba
      Posted 18/10/2012 at 6:51 am | Permalink | Reply

      thanks for the Review Renai but as a current Note user l would be more interested in Note 1 Vs2 Comparison. what’s the stylus like? the screen is bigger but resolution lower. Does that make a difference? Do the Soft keys still pick upt ithe base of your hand when writing ? Is there improvement in handwriting recognition? is it using Samsungs handwriting SDK or Google’s? Etc


    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights