• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Featured, News - Written by on Thursday, January 27, 2011 14:46 - 9 Comments

    IT’S MANDATORY: Govt forces open source option

    The Federal Government has dramatically changed its position on the use of open source software by departments and agencies in Canberra, publishing a policy today that mandates the consideration of such options in any technology purchase.

    The news comes days after a decision by peak IT strategy group the Australian Government Information Management Office to standardise on Microsoft’s Office Open XML document standard sparked controversy, due to what many saw as the format’s lack of compatibility with open source office suites such as OpenOffice.org.

    In a statement published on AGIMO’s blog, Gary Gray — the Special Minister for State who oversees the agency — said the Government’s previous policy on open source, established in 2005, was one of “informed neutrality” — meaning agencies did not favour open source or proprietary solutions by default, but picked the technology which represented the best value for money and fit for purpose.

    “Since then, there has been an increase in the maturity of the open source software products and the use of open source software by governments around the world. In recent years, many governments have revised their policies to increase the adoption of open source software,” wrote Gray.

    “This revised Australian Government policy on open source software will ensure that we maintain international best practice and that our purchases of software will continue to reflect best value for money for the Government.” Agencies will be required to comply with the new so-called Open Source Software Policy Principles from 1 March this year.

    The principles — published online (RTF) — require that when buying software worth more than $80,000, agencies “are required to include in their procurement plan that open source software will be considerd equally alongside proprietary software” — including documenting how they considered open source software during the process.

    In addition, departments and agencies are now required to “actively participate” in open source software communities and contribute back where appropriate.

    The move comes just days after AGIMO has faced a large degree of criticism for what some have seen as a lack of support for open standards and open source software.

    Last week, AGIMO published its Common Operating Environment Policy, which contains a number of guidelines restricting how departments and agencies should allow users to access their desktops. The document recommends users not be allowed administrative access to their PCs, requires Microsoft’s Office Open XML document standard, and places restrictions on how web browsers can be used, for example.

    AGIMO’s research prior to writing the policy had shown that more than 99.5 percent of government PCs were based on Windows, with more than 86 percent using Microsoft Office. IBM’s Lotus Symphony was the runner up with just under 13 percent usage. Use of open source browsers such as Firefox was sparse in Government — as was use of OpenOffice.org.

    Image credit: Ian Burt, Creative Commons

    submit to reddit

    9 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Posted 27/01/2011 at 2:54 pm | Permalink |

      I love the ‘use of open source browsers such as Firefox was sparse in Government …’. More like the ‘acknowledge use’ is low.

      And then there are those people who take their work home and use Open Office rather than pay for a copy of Microsoft Office …

    2. Posted 27/01/2011 at 3:42 pm | Permalink |

      This is strange.

      Open Source is all well and good, and in many instances provides the best solution to a given computing problem. But sometimes it doesn’t…

      If OS is the best way to tackle a problem, great. If it isn’t, don’t use it.

      There is some brilliant open source solutions out there. There are also some very poor ones.

      • Posted 27/01/2011 at 4:24 pm | Permalink |

        That sounds kind of like what the article is saying. Previously many gov agencies and departments policy (perhaps not policy – more like culture) that “we don’t use open source here”, perhaps due to a negative past experience, legal issues, or simply due to lack of understanding of the concept.

        The new policy isn’t forcing them to use OSS software, just that it “should be considered equally”. An excellent move!

      • Aubrey
        Posted 27/01/2011 at 4:26 pm | Permalink |

        Michael, isn’t that exactly what the new guidelines provide for? It isn’t a policy to make open source MANDATORY (as per the headline) – just ensuring that it gets MANDATORY consideration based on value-for-money (not price) considerations.

        I’ve worked in a number of government agencies that paid big bucks for proprietary software only to find themselves trapped into escalating commercial support costs when the initial contract expires. In several cases the product delivered never met the claims of the sales team anyway. I have also tried to have Open Source solutions evaluated alongside proprietary ones only to be told that “the government doesn’t use shareware”.

        This policy is great news but, even as an open source users and advocate, I really don’t expect to see radical change on the desktop – it will be in new, specialised apps that we MIGHT see some gradual change.

      • Posted 27/01/2011 at 5:33 pm | Permalink |

        I have no idea why the headline includes the confusing word “MANDATORY”, but the policy requires that open source and proprietary solutions be considered on equal footing. If it’s shit, it’s shit, either way. :-)

        • Posted 27/01/2011 at 5:43 pm | Permalink |

          The mandatory word aside, I read the policy as stronger than that; not just requiring they be on an equal footing, but actively requiring agencies to look for a FOSS alternative and justify why they didn’t pick it. It’s an ‘active’ policy, not a ‘neutral’ one.

          • Posted 27/01/2011 at 6:21 pm | Permalink |

            That’s how I read it too…nothing like a bit of ambiguity… ;)

    3. Posted 27/01/2011 at 4:45 pm | Permalink |

      Hey everyone, I’ve posted my opinion on this here:

      Why AGIMO’s open source policy will change nothing:
      http://delimiter.com.au/2011/01/27/why-agimos-open-source-policy-will-change-nothing/

      In short, I believe this policy won’t get anywhere. An excerpt:

      AGIMO’s open source policy published this week might as well have been a photocopy of the policy produced under Howard, updated with a slight sting in the tail for naughty agencies that didn’t pay attention. And we saw how far the previous policy got. Far from stimulating the use of open source software in Government, it actually retarded it.

    4. Green
      Posted 28/01/2011 at 1:02 am | Permalink |

      “that mandates the consideration of such options in any technology purchase.”

      You are kidding, you dare to call that “mandatory”? That is a detraction. Consideration of different options is just natural for a government agency, for non-discriminatory procurement in line with WTO rules.




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights