Defence conducts trial


The Department of Defence has reportedly conducted an informal trial of the open source productivity suite involving some 100 users.

According to iTNews (click here for the full story), the initiative was kicked off by Defence chief technology officer Matt Yannopoulos over the past year. However, it does not appear likely the initiative will immediately broaden into a wider rollout at Defence, with Yannopoulos noting it would be a major decision for the department, which has long been a Microsoft shop.

The news comes as Australia appears to be witnessing a resurgence in interest in open source technologies this year, with the Federal Government taking several bold moves in the area in the past six months.

In January, for example, the Federal Government dramatically changed its position on the use of open source software by departments and agencies, publishing a policy which mandated the consideration of such options in any technology purchase. Previously, the Government’s stated policy on open source had been one of “informed neutrality” — meaning agencies picked the technology (closed or open source) which represented the best value for money and fit for purpose.

In addition, in July the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO), which sets central government IT policy, released a second version of its guide to open source software for departments and agencies. It appears as if the Department of Defence’s trial is linked to the department’s move to join the Open Technology Foundation, an organisation set up by the South Australian Government in late 2010 to promote the use of open systems in government. Defence sits on the organisation’s board.

However, all three moves come after a long drought period in Australia when it comes to public sector interest in open source software.

Thoughout the middle of the past decade, heightened interest in platforms such as, the Mozilla Firefox web browser and the Linux operating system on desktops was seen in governments around Australia and even private corporations such as Telstra, as chief information officers sought alternatives to Microsoft’s strong grip on the industry.

The interest resulted in few local deployments, however. Last year AGIMO revealed just three percent of government desktops were using Firefox, despite the browser’s strong popularity on private machines. And this year, AGIMO revealed 99.5 percent of government desktops were running Windows, with 86 percent using Microsoft Office.

In addition, AGIMO’s survey of agencies last year showed that those percentages were actually slated to increase — with no agencies planning to upgrade to any software in the future, other than that provided by Microsoft. Windows 7, Office 2007 and Office 2010 were the sole platforms mentioned.

Wow — you simply have to give Defence chief information officer Greg Farr some credit for changing the internal culture within the department’s technology operation since he joined the organisation in November 2007. From being one of the government’s most conservative technology operations to running trials of — that’s a big jump for Defence. Much of the credit should also be laid at the doorstep of Yannopoulos, who we hear is quite the innovative thinker.

It’s also fantastic to see interest in kicking off again in government. While there was quite a degree of interest in the suite half a decade ago, that interest has waned over the past few years, as Microsoft has solidified the integration between different layers of its enterprise software stack. It’s just too hard to pick anything other than Office these days, when the suite offers such great integration with other platforms such as Exchange, Active Directory, Windows Server and so on.

In this context, its great to see some competition creeping slowly back (even just a little bit) into the desktop productivity suite market. It’s never a great outcome when one player dominates any market as strongly as Microsoft is this scene right now.

However, realistically, it is unlikely Defence’s trial will really get anywhere in the long term. At its heart, Defence is quite a conservative organisation, and it won’t want to be the first in the Federal Government to deploy a radically different desktop software suite.

Farr and Yannopoulos will be quite aware that their efforts are much better spent on initiatives such as the overhaul of Defence’s troubled ERP systems, for example, rather with toying with alternative desktop suites which offer no real sustainable organisation advantage over the incumbent. It’s a pity — but that’s enterprise IT life in 2011.

Image credit: Brian Li, GNU Lesser General Public License


  1. I feel like once again the government is just a tad out of date. is slowly being eroded by other productivity suites like LibraOffice, because of its bloated nature.

    • *LibreOffice, but they’re similar enough at the moment for comparison, I’d say. Deployment no.

  2. Start with standards. Point out that DOCX YYYX was created to subvert the opportunity in Open. Point out that OpenOffice et al are more compatible with Microsoft Office than is Microsoft Office.

  3. Germany’s defence department got rid of MS software in preference for open source software due to closed source security concerns., in particular a cryptographic key in Windows Server possibly connected with the NSA.

  4. We have been using OpenOffice in our Law Firm of 20 users for 4 years now. After the first 6 weeks of people complaining that they just like MS Office better and never giving a good reason we have had very few problems, fewer than we had on MS Office.

    • That’s good to hear. Do the users still dislike using OpenOffice comapred to MS Office, though? Did they just shutup and grumble internally, or are they actually using OpenOffice and getting their work done effectively and quickly without it?

Comments are closed.