• Catch issues early, fix them fast – Free trial


    [ad] With GFI Cloud you can easily manage and secure your remote workforce – wherever they are, from wherever you are! The simple IT management platform includes patch management, antivirus, web protection, monitoring and remote control. Get the benefit of endpoint protection with the ease of central management. Start a free trial now.


  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites


  • Featured, Industry, News - Written by on Thursday, April 17, 2014 9:28 - 2 Comments

    Campaign Monitor takes US$250m from US VC

    campaign-monitor-retreat

    news Australia-based software as a service email marketing platform Campaign Monitor announced overnight that it had taken a $250 million investment from US-based venture capital firm Insight Venture Partners, in one of the largest ever VC investments in an Australian technology startup.

    Campaign Monitor is a leading email marketing platform similar to Mailchimp that makes it easy for anyone to send newsletters and generate reports on the result. The company, which has only 65 employees (pictured above at their annual retreat in Hawaii), was founded in 2004 by Australian web designers Ben Richardson and David Greiner and has been profitable every quarter since launch, it said today. More than 100,000 paying customers in 170 countries rely on Campaign Monitor to manage their email marketing.

    In a post on the company’s blog, Greiner said “times like these” forced him to look back to where it all started.

    “It honestly feels like yesterday that Ben and I were running our own small design agency out of a spare room, building web sites and managing email campaigns for our clients,” he said. “As an agency with fairly unique needs, it wasn’t long before we grew frustrated with the tools available to manage these campaigns, and eventually decided the only way to solve it was to build our own. It’s funny how small decisions like that can have such a big impact on your life.”

    The entrepreneur said while the company’s “numbers” were great, the truth was that Campaign Monitor had only come as far as it hard because of its customers.

    “It still amazes me how many people that were willing to give us a try when we launched in 2004 are still using Campaign Monitor today, a full decade later,” he said. “There aren’t a lot of [software as a service] businesses out there that can say that. There aren’t a lot of businesses that can say that full stop.”

    “We’re also incredibly proud of our bootstrapping heritage. Being focused on running a profitable business from day one has given us the freedom to do things our own way, even if that’s in a completely different direction to most of our competitors. We’ve grown into the business we are today by focusing on what matters: building software that people love to use and making sure our customers have an amazing experience doing business with us.”

    “You guys – the people who read our blog, enjoy our content and use our product – have done the rest by spreading the word.But the truth is, there’s so much more to be done. We want to make sure we continue to grow our team the right way and stay laser focused on building something that people will still love using a decade from today.”

    “Campaign Monitor is just getting started. That’s why we’ve partnered up with Insight – a team we’ve built a relationship with over the last 5 years that have an amazing track record of helping companies we admire. These guys understand our dedication to building a great product and totally get the culture we’ve all worked so hard to create. As we grow from 65 to 165 people and beyond, we’ve now got the backing and wisdom of a partner that’s literally helped hundreds of software businesses before us. Stay tuned for some very exciting product updates in the coming weeks too. The team has been working their buns off on some great stuff that we can’t wait to get into your hands. Thanks for the last amazing decade, and here’s to the next one.”

    Insight Venture Partners is one of the largest and best-known venture capital firms in the US. The group was founded in 1995 and has raised more than US$7.6 billion since that time. The company’s mission is to find, fund and work successfully with “visionary” executives who are driving change in their industries.

    Deven Parekh, managing director at Insight Venture Partners said in a separate statement: “Campaign Monitor leads the market in SaaS email marketing and design solutions. We have been impressed by their remarkable global growth, widespread adoption and high customer satisfaction. Insight’s investment will help the company capitalize on the global demand for their solutions and build a global team to serve customers in all markets.”

    Richardson and Greiner will continue to lead the company, but Insight Venture Partners managing directors Deven Parekh and Nikitas Koutoupes, along with associate Dan May, will join the company’s Board of Directors.

    The Financial Review has additionally reported a number of further details about the deal, including the fact that Campaign Monitor is also raising a further US$160 million in debt, and that the VC investment valued the company at $600 million. The newspaper also reported that Campaign Monitor had talked to a number of other venture capital firms about possible investment, including Australian firm Square Peg Capital.

    The investment is one of the largest known funding rounds for a venture capital firm in Australia, dwarfing the $60 million which US VC firm Accel ploughed into local software firm Atlassian in mid-2010. However, it appears that Insight has bought a substantially larger slice of Campaign Monitor than Accel bought in the Atlassian case.

    opinion/analysis
    Two things to say here.

    Firstly and most obviously, a massive congratulations must go to the Campaign Monitor guys. I’ve been aware of them for some time and it’s been obvious for some time that the company had the “it” factor needed to achieve global scale. Delimiter uses Mailchimp for our (quite large) email newsletter, but I have evaluated Campaign Monitor a number of times, and will do so again. If the company can do enough to win my business then I will switch away.

    It’s just great to see an Australian business achieving this way, and I wish its founders well.

    However, secondly, it is also important to note that, as we’ve seen in past similar cases (especially Atlassian, which recently handed off another parcel of stock to US investors), it is really not Australians who will benefit by and large from Campaign Monitor’s success. I know the venture capital market is small in Australia and could not support a US$250 million investment of this level, but at the level that Campaign Monitor is playing at, I strongly suspect that the company could have attracted interest from quite a few large Australian investment groups.

    The fact that the company has gone offshore for the entirety of this deal mans that if Campaign Monitor eventually is bought out or lists its stock publicly, most of the financial benefits from that deal will also go offshore, lining the pockets of the already wealthy US venture capital industry even more.

    Industry wisdom is currently that it is only through working with big US venture capital firms that Australian IT startups are able to gain the experience and exposure to take their businesses global, as Atlassian has already done and as Campaign Monitor is now seeking to do.

    However, I must also point out that with an investment round the size that Campaign Monitor picked up here, it is quite possible to work with multiple investors, including some based in Australia and some based in the US. This would have had the benefit of bolstering the Australian IT investment ecosystem with Campaign Monitor’s long-term growth while the company could also take advantage of US corporate expertise.

    I know I whine and complain about this issue constantly. But I have been a technology journalist for a long time, and I’ve seen the same cycle repeating itself constantly for the past decade and more in Australia. It is our national habit to growth great technology companies and then to sell them off to the Americans. In some ways the strategy is a good one, given that it means entrepreneurs such as Greiner and Richardson are then able to become Australia-based investors in other companies, using their new funds.

    But in a wider sense it also continually undercuts the Australian IT startup investment ecosystem, and hence the development of that ecosystem. I’m a little tired of seeing great Australian companies sold to US firms. Australian IT startups such as Freelancer have started to push back on that trend a little recently, choosing to list in Australia in a way that benefits Australian investors and attracts more to the IT sector. I apologise sincerely for preaching, but I’d like to see that practice taken a little more seriously by the next generation of IT startup entrepreneurs. Money isn’t everything ;) Especially when it comes in these amounts.

    Image credit: Campaign Monitor

    submit to reddit

    2 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Posted 18/04/2014 at 8:33 am | Permalink |

      Sam Chandler (NitroPDF, $3M in investment from Starfish VC) wrote a great article about later stage investment in Australia and the lack there of: http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/it-opinion/when-startups-become-grownups-where-do-they-go-for-money-20140312-hvhv4.html

    2. Chris
      Posted 16/05/2014 at 1:43 pm | Permalink |

      I’ve been in the Aussie start-up scene for 2+ years now. Every single place I turn to, every support group, every organisation, both private/social/government, … they ALL push us *hard* to shift overseas.




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds — AustralianSuper, CBus, HESTA and more — is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, as was revealed in November, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well, and the Financial Review last week reported that Superpartners is actually close to turfing it altogether and going back to the drawing board.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights