• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Renai's other site: Sci-fi + fantasy book news and reviews
  • RSS Renai LeMay

  • Enterprise IT, Featured, News - Written by on Wednesday, May 29, 2013 15:04 - 21 Comments

    Reversal: Australian Govt picks ODF doc standard


    news In a move which appears to reverse its previous approach based on Microsoft’s file formats, the Australian Government’s central IT decision-making agency appears to have decided that it will standardise its office documents on the Open Document Format going forward.

    The Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) has been examining office file formats for several years, as part of what it terms its Common Operating Environment Policy, a document which contains a number of guidelines restricting how departments and agencies should allow users to access their desktops.

    In January 2011, AGIMO had initially decided to standardise departments and agencies on Microsoft’s Office Open XML format, the format primarily used by Microsoft’s Office 2007 and 2010 suites. However, the move was greeted by a sea of criticism directed at the agency by online commenters, and consequently AGIMO decided to re-examine the choice.

    Most alternative office suites cannot write documents in the standard. The ODF Alliance, which is supporting a rival format, has claimed the Office Open XML format was riddled with “Windows-platform dependencies” and essentially tied users to Microsoft Office, and some organisations, such as the National Archives of Australia, have picked the ODF standard instead in the long-term. AGIMO subsequently defended its decision, stating it had no vendor bias.

    In a blog post in September 2012, AGIMO’s then-first assistant secretary of its Agency Services Division, John Sheridan, noted that following “robust discussion”, AGIMO had standardised on two standardised variants of Office Open XML.

    However, in a new blog post yesterday, Sheridan — now the Federal Government’s whole of government chief technology officer — noted that a new review of the COE policy had come up with a draft requiring office productivity software used by Australian Government departments and agencies to support version 1.1 of ODF. In evaluating the choice, Sheridan said the Government had taken into account a number of factors.

    Firstly, the CTO wrote, the adoption of ODF as “the preferred supported format” was consistent with the aims of the COE policy, namely to ensure that the policy was based on “common standards”, and that where practical, “open standards”.

    Sheridan added: “Support for ODF is available from a wide range of office productivity suites across a variety of operating system platforms, in both open-source and proprietary implementations, allowing agencies a great deal of flexibility in selecting a product which conforms to the COE Policy standard. Standardising on a format supported by a wide range of office suites provides for the greatest possible degree of interoperability without mandating the use of a specific product, as well as providing the best basis for reliable interchange of information between agencies deploying differing office productivity suites.”

    The CTO noted that the majority of Australian Government agencies currently deployed a version of Microsoft Office, but this did not limit the adoption of ODF as the common format, as versions of Microsoft Office later than Office 2007 SP2 provided native support for ODF.

    In addition, Sheridan added: “Support for a format based on an open standard ensures the long-term availability of the data contained in documents produced while eliminating the potential for a vendor ending support for a specific format.”

    ODF was also continually developed and updated, the CTO added, and the inclusion of a spreadsheet formula specification in version 1.2 of ODF addressed one of the key factors which had previously limited interoperability between spreadsheet applications in previous versions of the standard. This, coupled with Microsoft Office 2013’s support for the format, meant that formulae contained in spreadsheets could now be reliably transferred between applications, according to Sheridan.

    In addition, Sheridan noted that the ODF format may provide greater support for cloud-hosted office productivity suites — such as Googel Docs.

    However, the Government has also left the door open for agencies to use existing file formats, such as Microsoft’s Office Open XML. “Defining a common format to be supported by all office productivity suites does not preclude the use of other formats,” wrote Sheridan.

    From my point of view, it’s never been a huge issue that AGIMO had standardised on Office Open XML. I wrote the following in February 2012:

    “From my perspective, I believe that AGIMO is being too cautious. Frankly, the office productivity wars are over. OpenOffice.org and similar open source suites have absolutely no presence in Australia, Google Docs has similarly gone nowhere in the enterprise, and even powerful players such as IBM have been unable to make any headway in this area.

    Microsoft is the dominant, monopoly player in corporate office suites, and Australia’s Federal Government would be silly to choose any other standard than one supported strongly by Microsoft. As Sheridan alludes to in his post, as long as Microsoft remains fairly open and transparent, which it is these days, there are no business advantages to using competing suites. The use of something like OpenOffice.org is very much purely an ideological matter.

    Microsoft’s victory in this area has been assured through the completion of its powerful technology stack. SharePoint integrates with Office integrates with Outlook integrates with Exchange integrates with Windows Server. And so on. If you’re using something like OpenOffice.org, you simply don’t get this advantages. And Google’s refusal to allow users to host their documents in-country has damned its own (pretty decent, if feature-limited) Docs platform to obscurity, especially in regulation-sensitive government.

    Don’t get me wrong; I would love to see some competition for Microsoft Office arise and challenge Redmond’s dominance. But until that happens, the Federal Government should stop worrying about this issue, and focus on other areas where platform choice can make a real difference. Allowing users to install their own web browser — instead of forcing everyone to use old versions of Internet Explorer — would be a good start. Some of us like tabbed browsing. It seems like it’s here to stay.”

    However, I must say that standardising on ODF is a very positive move for the Federal Government. I wouldn’t say that it delivers a huge competitive advantage, but it does make a huge amount of sense in the long term with respect to government data storage, and it also displays a great deal of leadership. The potential for this kind of leadership from Sheridan in particular was one reason why I was so enthusiastic to see the executive appointed as CTO last year, and it’s great to see that move already having such a positive move on Federal Government technology strategy.

    Print Friendly


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Nick
      Posted 29/05/2013 at 3:13 pm | Permalink |

      Your previous post missed the key problem with Microsoft’s formats: they’re awful for phone and tablet users. As the dominance of the PC fades, so goes the dominance of Microsoft Office.

      • Dan
        Posted 29/05/2013 at 4:19 pm | Permalink |


        Opening DOCX/XLSX on the tablet is a totally random shot in the dark as to what info you get (or don’t get) and the layout is never correct.

        Maybe if MS released office iOS edition, that might be different, but they simply refuse to let Apple take 25% of the sales revenue

        Like I say to my sales guys, 75% of nothing is still nothing, so pull your head in!

      • T
        Posted 29/05/2013 at 11:24 pm | Permalink |

        Just finished removing all the thin clients and monitors of my employees and replaced them with smartphones. The IT guy said he really needed his (six) screens so I gave him six phones with hdmi output.

        “the key problem with Microsoft’s formats: they’re awful for phone and tablet users.”
        I personally don’t know any phone/tablet user* facing more issues opening MS formats than other formats, rather it’s the other way around.

        *99% Windows/Android so almost no iOS

    2. Ausgnome
      Posted 29/05/2013 at 4:39 pm | Permalink |

      Good on them, a good step forward especially for Long term storage of documents, now they just need to do the same for there PDF documents use the open standard not the Open Standard + Adobe extras ;)

    3. Posted 29/05/2013 at 5:43 pm | Permalink |

      A few years late, but the correct decision. Trouble is, the open alternative needed this kind of support to flourish back then – AGIMO is a little late to the party.
      Still, it’s a step in the right direction.
      Not sure how OpenOffice nee StarOffice nee LibreOffice is faring these days – Google Docs appears to have eaten this lunch. If it actually has a native format, it’s known only to Google unfortunately.

    4. scoot
      Posted 29/05/2013 at 6:23 pm | Permalink |

      I couldn’t seem to find any Android apps that can edit ODF. I was using an ods spreadsheet but had to change to xls because there was only a OpenOffice “reader” and nothing to edit the spreadsheet with. If anyone knows of an app that can edit ODF on Android I would be happy to know. That said I think its great that the Government are going in this direction so there is less tie to Microsoft products.

      • Matt
        Posted 29/05/2013 at 6:59 pm | Permalink |

        Libreoffice has a beta for Android, it will probably be released in the next few months.

    5. Frank
      Posted 29/05/2013 at 7:31 pm | Permalink |

      I find your previous commentary short sighted, at best. It’s not about how good the solutions are currently. It’s about 1) not storing data in a format that requires users to pay for access to 2) storing data in a format that allows for interoperability.

      It’s nearly like a tax, if your kids are doing work at school and want to be able to read and edit the documents they create when they get home, you have to shell out for a copy of microsoft office.

      And even if I had nothing against that, what about an exit strategy? Any smart business will not tie themselves to a particular vendor, but yet australian government has been tying all their documents containing their IP to a particular vendor, that isn’t even australian.

      I think this new move is an excellent step in the right direction, if not 10 years too late.

    6. Stef
      Posted 29/05/2013 at 8:04 pm | Permalink |

      Obvious advantages to using Open Office

      – It’s free. Compared to god knows how much for the MS licenses.
      – It’s more user friendly. The text editor and spread sheets have clean basic layouts, compared to MS layouts with dozens upon dozens of buttons and toolbars at the top of your screen.
      – Generating a PDF of your document works perfectly, is built-in and equally free.
      – An ideological one: promoting free open source software.
      – Mobile version rumored to appear at the end of 2013.

      There’s actually a better “flavor” of Open Office, called Libre Office which has fixed a ton of bugs.

      • Tristram
        Posted 29/05/2013 at 11:17 pm | Permalink |

        LibreOffice is also developed by the former developers of OpenOffice. After Sun Microsystems was purchased OpenOffice developers left to form the Open Document Foundation and proceeded to fork OpenOffice forming LibreOffice. Even Oracle’s flavor of Linux uses LibreOffice now.

        • Tom
          Posted 30/05/2013 at 1:02 pm | Permalink |

          Oracle has since given all control over OpenOffice to the Apache Software Foundation.

    7. Posted 29/05/2013 at 8:58 pm | Permalink |

      Pretty cool stuff!
      MS will clearly loose ground in the future of “governmental IT & document processing”
      As for other programs, like Google Docs: In the USA there are already 50+ governments and authorities using Google Apps&Docs for enterprise.
      (But yes, this is also something proprietary)
      LibreOffice will be the future!

    8. Citizen
      Posted 29/05/2013 at 9:01 pm | Permalink |

      This is just fantastic, the next step would be for the Universities across Australia to make the change.

    9. Brownieboy
      Posted 30/05/2013 at 1:30 pm | Permalink |


      > However, I must say that standardising on ODF is a very positive move for
      > the Federal Government.

      Glad you think so … now. Because your arguments back in Feb 2012 – basically, Microsoft has won so you better just suck it up – smacked of follow the herd, status quo conformism. Not exactly the “better to die on your feet that live on your knees” outlook that Australians like to pride themselves on.

      On the plus side, that posting was graced by Mr John Sheridan, who took the time to answer many of the questions posted in the comments. I can’t say that I was convinced that he was listening to any of us at the time, but it’s very nice to be proved wrong!

      • Russell Stuart
        Posted 30/05/2013 at 3:43 pm | Permalink |


        And I too am in awe of John Sheridan. A senior public servant let came out of his lair to discuss his reasons for doing things to the unwashed, rude masses. It’s a near impossible ask – I imagine he is very much a cog in the machine and so is constrained in what he can say. Still, he did a very good job in explaining why they made the decisions they did.

        I wish it happened far more often.

    10. Ed
      Posted 30/05/2013 at 3:35 pm | Permalink |

      I think everyone is getting very confused between file format standards and the products used to open them, and the real undercurrent here is that what many of you folks want is Microsoft Office to be killed off due to some grievance you have.

      I’ll happily keep using Microsoft Office, thanks. It works well and I don’t have to worry about you neckbeards telling me to switch from OpenOffice to LibreOffice, or from LibreOffice to whatever the next freaking fork is as the dev community cracks the sads with itself.

    11. michael
      Posted 30/05/2013 at 11:24 pm | Permalink |

      I’ll just leave this here to remind everyone the ‘real’ format documents end up in the Federal Government, as directed by the Archives Act.


      And they have some wonderful software that encapsulated BOTH formats, and about 2 dozen more


    12. Posted 31/05/2013 at 3:22 pm | Permalink |

      An interesting discussion is worth comment. I thinks you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next.

    13. Bill R
      Posted 31/05/2013 at 5:55 pm | Permalink |

      The rationale for standardising our business of ODF was based on data sovgreinity and client choice (OpenOffice / LibreOffice run on Linux, Windows, and Mac operating systems) … the price differential was also nice.

      Regarding Office Open XML, it may be slightly better than the completely proprietary formats that preceeded it, but its primary editor (MS Office**) still doesn’t run all all platforms (and I understand doesn’t always treat all available platforms as equals).

      ** OpenOffice / LibreOffice can edit MS Office format files but it still functions more reliably when working with its native ODF formatted files.

    14. Glen Turner
      Posted 03/06/2013 at 10:48 am | Permalink |

      The same document mandates the non-free MPEG2 and MP3 codecs for video and audio.

      It also contains a large number of “Windows best practices” which run counter to best practice of other operating systems, whilst not giving an exemption path for those other operating systems. This is particularly so with software management, which Windows does very poorly, so a hack using VMs is recommended.

      The document also mandates X86-64. I doubt the authors considered that this excludes devices with ARM CPUs (tablets, ChromeBooks, etc).

      There’s also a interesting passage on e-mail, where protocols with plaintext passwords are (presumably unknowingly) recommended.

      My full comments are at

      As usual, these are my views, not those of my employer. I do hope Dept of Finance do correct the flaws with the document because guidance for SOE is a very good idea. But if such guidance become mandatory it does require the issuer to have sufficient knowledge of the world outside of the Windows.

    15. AP
      Posted 03/06/2013 at 4:09 pm | Permalink |

      “Google Docs has similarly gone nowhere in the enterprise, and even powerful players such as IBM have been unable to make any headway in this area.”

      Woolworths, Dick Smith.. unsure how you define enterprise

  • Get our weekly newsletter

    All our stories, just one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Legacy health software lands SA Govt in court doctor

      In which the South Australian Government comes up with complex legal arguments as to why it should be able to continue to use a 1980’s software package.

    • Microsoft wants to win you back with Windows 10 windows-10

      The latest version of Microsoft’s Windows operating system will begin rolling out from Wednesday (July 29). And remarkably, Windows 10 will be offered as a free upgrade to those users who already have Windows 7 and 8.1 installed.

    • Qld Govt Depts have no disaster recovery plan brisvegas2

      Two sizable Queensland Government departments have no central disaster recovery plan, the state’s Auditor-General has found, despite the region’s ongoing struggles with extreme weather conditions that have previously knocked out telecommunications and data centre infrastructure.

    • ASD releases Windows 8 hardening guide windows-8-1

      The Australian Signals Directorate appears to have released a guide to hardening Microsoft’s Windows 8 operating system, three years after the software was released for use by corporate customers, and as Microsoft is slated to release its next upgrade, Windows 10.

    • ASG picks up $35m CIMIC IT services deal money

      Perth-headquartered IT services group ASG this week revealed it had picked up a deal worth at least $35 million over five years with CIMIC Group — the massive construction and contracting group previously known as Leighton Holdings.

  • Blog, Policy + Politics - Jul 31, 2015 12:43 - 0 Comments

    Google ploughs $1m into Australian tech education

    More In Policy + Politics

    Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 31, 2015 14:16 - 1 Comment

    Legacy health software lands SA Govt in court

    More In Enterprise IT

    Industry, News - Jul 28, 2015 12:37 - 0 Comments

    ICAC to investigate NSW TAFE ICT manager

    More In Industry

    Consumer Tech, News - Jul 29, 2015 17:14 - 11 Comments

    Telstra integrates Netflix, Stan, Presto into re-badged Roku box

    More In Consumer Tech