• Catch issues early, fix them fast – Free trial


    [ad] With GFI Cloud you can easily manage and secure your remote workforce – wherever they are, from wherever you are! The simple IT management platform includes patch management, antivirus, web protection, monitoring and remote control. Get the benefit of endpoint protection with the ease of central management. Start a free trial now.


  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites


  • Featured, News, Telecommunications - Written by on Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:51 - 19 Comments

    Movie Rights Group website shut down, VP leaves

    news The website for controversial anti-piracy organisation Movie Rights Group has inexplicably vanished from the Internet and its vice president of sales and marketing has quit, leading to speculation that the organisation has been shut down for good.

    MRG is a new organisation which was set up in Australia last year with the aim of protecting the copyright rights of content owners in the film industry. In mid-October it was revealed that MRG had approached every major Australian ISP seeking information on users who had allegedly infringed copyright online, initially seeking the details of some 9,000 Australians who it claimed had downloaded the film Kill the Irishman.

    At that stage, the company’s then-vice president of sales and marketing Gordon Walker told Delimiter at the time, there were plans to broaden the company’s efforts to other films.

    Unlike the other major Australian organisation representing the film industry, the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft, Movie Rights Group had planned to take a different approach to piracy. Instead of legally targeting ISPs for the actions of their users, it was planning to seek to subpoena customer information from the ISPs and contact those who had allegedly infringed its copyright directly, looking to settle the matter out of court or through legal action.

    The website had previously featured a prominent notice informing visitors that one of its chief services was settling lawsuits with Internet users who had allegedly infringed its clients’ copyright. However, Reddit users noted in the past several days that the organisation’s website had disappeared from the Internet.

    In addition, Walker, who had acted as the company’s only known spokesperson, has updated his LinkedIn profile to note that he no longer works for the company as at November and was now a small to medium business development business consultant based in Brisbane. Walker has not responded to an emailed request for comment on the issue.

    The disappearance of MRG’s website and Walker’s departure from the company have come after extensive press coverage on the company and its founders. In addition, national broadband provider Exetel has signalled it may modify its core business systems to make it more difficult for anti-piracy organisations such as Movie Rights Group to target its customers for allegedly illegally downloading content through platforms like BitTorrent.

    opinion/analysis
    Do I think Movie Rights Group has shut down permanently? I’m not sure. The situation is clouded at the moment. With no easy way to get in touch with the rest of the company’s owners or staff, and no real knowledge of what’s happened, I guess we’ll have to wait and see what chips may fall from this one. One thing I do know, however, is that websites don’t just disappear from the Internet for no reason.

    If you do know what has occurred at Movie Rights Group, please feel free to use Delimiter’s anonymous tips line.

    submit to reddit

    19 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Alienangel
      Posted 22/11/2011 at 12:56 pm | Permalink |

      Extra lolz if the website was given a DMCA takedown notice.

      • Zero
        Posted 22/11/2011 at 2:52 pm | Permalink |

        That brought a massive smile to my face, thankyou :D

    2. Posted 22/11/2011 at 1:26 pm | Permalink |

      Keep shining the light on these bastards. It’s what they hate the most.

    3. Dean
      Posted 22/11/2011 at 2:05 pm | Permalink |

      $ dig +short movierightsgroup.com
      64.237.47.74

      $ whois 64.237.47.74
      . . .
      Hyperfocus Media, Inc. NET-64-237-47-64-26 (NET-64-237-47-64-1) 64.237.47.64 – 64.237.47.127
      . . .

      Perhaps you could get in touch with the owner of the IP address movierightsgroup.com resolves to, Hyperfocus Media? They seem to have a Linked In profile at least.

    4. Posted 22/11/2011 at 2:10 pm | Permalink |

      Completely unsurprising and no doubt what iiNet were banking on happening when they voiced “support” for their process. Just like in the US, it is unsustainable under the current set of laws.

      This is what SOPA is intended to address though. If SOPA passes, entities like this will become a dime a dozen.

      • atter
        Posted 22/11/2011 at 9:41 pm | Permalink |

        Er, no, this is nothing to do with SOPA. SOPA is about attacking websites, mainly by going after their payment processors.

    5. Posted 22/11/2011 at 4:41 pm | Permalink |

      Considering the things that people have exposed about the two brothers in the past few weeks I am not surprised they have walked away from this one with the tail between their legs.

      • Sean
        Posted 22/11/2011 at 5:04 pm | Permalink |

        [Censored -- sorry. Renai]

        Class act! It appears they were looking to jump on the Digital Rights bandwagon to make some easy money.

        • Posted 22/11/2011 at 5:18 pm | Permalink |

          And, what’s the problem with them being a subsidiary of a business that has investments in the [censored for legal reasons] industry?

          While not the type of sites I frequent personally (and by the sounds of neither do you), it is a legitimate and legal business. Striking them down because you disagree with what they do [censored] is unjust, and just as bad what the ACL and similar do.

          [Note: Apologies --Renai]

          • Sean
            Posted 22/11/2011 at 9:02 pm | Permalink |

            Even though Renai censored my post I did not imply that running a ******** business was illegal. My point is to merely state that their interest in Digital Rights was purely driven from a profit point of view rather than any ethical reason. ;)

            • Posted 22/11/2011 at 9:43 pm | Permalink |

              It’s a shame Renai edited your post so highly but that was my point, the business in question wasn’t illegal, and you were stating their efforts were purely profitable based on the ethics of the other business.

              Regardless, since your original post is gone it’s pretty futile to argue about what it did or did not say :/

          • Jeremy
            Posted 23/11/2011 at 11:51 am | Permalink |

            Seriously, you can’t see the problem? Would you be happy for your personal details to be in the hands of such characters?

            Their business may be (mainly) legal but they are still not the type of people that should have access to the personal details of others.

    6. Duke
      Posted 22/11/2011 at 5:04 pm | Permalink |

      The exposure of the brodudes two main assets – the gangstawannabeeaplayatryhard chin fluffs – led to speedy closure pending schick attacks and possible return as babysbum jawbois…

    7. R
      Posted 22/11/2011 at 8:07 pm | Permalink |

      I think they’ve shut up for good. Unlike in the US, the Aussie ISPs are much less likely to simply keel over for RIAA/AFACT/MRG/etc, and suing individuals isn’t economically feasible if they actually have to go through courts.

    8. T J
      Posted 23/11/2011 at 11:37 am | Permalink |

      Good riddance.

    9. BD
      Posted 23/11/2011 at 2:41 pm | Permalink |

      I know letters weren’t sent out to those who allegedly downloaded the movie so we don’t know what amount of monetary compensation would have been requested however from news articles they were proposing it would be around $3000. What I find unfair with that is how is such an amount derived. I know a barrister who’s represented people who have blatantly infridged copyright (selling non-genuine copies of various things – not just electronic media) and have been fined in court a pittance in comparison. So if someone through MRG’s intimidatory strategy paid up in full they’re probably in reality getting shafted….of which obviously MRG would know & hence why people resent them. If you downloaded something & didn’t pay I’d agree someone’s within their rights to seek compensation for the sale and even double/triple the purchase price for their time & effort…but asking for 100 times the value! Obviously just opportunists and why it doesn’t go down well publically.

      • Downloder
        Posted 24/11/2011 at 8:53 am | Permalink |

        $3000 is the amount at which an individual will pay up rather than be embarrassed in the court… it is approx slightly less than what it would cost to hire a lawyer for a day to go to court for you. Thus an obvious number! The number is not based on any “losses” sustained by the film company whatsoever.

    10. Jason Simmons
      Posted 23/11/2011 at 11:01 pm | Permalink |

      Unfortunately those a-holes are still registered as a company. This doesn’t mean they’ve finished…

      http://www2.search.asic.gov.au/cgi-bin/gns030c?acn=147_176_412&juris=9&hdtext=ACN&srchsrc=1

      • Jeremy
        Posted 24/11/2011 at 5:22 pm | Permalink |

        Thanks for the Asic link, we can see if they renew their ABN on the “Next Review Date: 03/11/2012″




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds — AustralianSuper, CBus, HESTA and more — is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, as was revealed in November, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well, and the Financial Review last week reported that Superpartners is actually close to turfing it altogether and going back to the drawing board.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights