• Catch issues early, fix them fast – Free trial


    [ad] With GFI Cloud you can easily manage and secure your remote workforce – wherever they are, from wherever you are! The simple IT management platform includes patch management, antivirus, web protection, monitoring and remote control. Get the benefit of endpoint protection with the ease of central management. Start a free trial now.


  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Featured, Opinion - Written by on Monday, November 1, 2010 15:36 - 14 Comments

    Google has lost its startup culture … and its mojo

    opinion The departure of high-profile and long-serving senior managers Kate Vale and Lars Rasmussen from Google Australia this month represents more than just the typical losses of a couple of mid-level employees to greener pastures.

    In fact, the pair’s exit from Google’s ranks signifies something much greater: The slipping away of a great dream — one of a truly innovative technology company that could escape the perils of bureaucracy and its accompanying stasis.

    Hunter S. Thompson wrote in the novel Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas that there was a sense in San Francisco in the middle of the 1960′s that that era was a very special time and place to be part of.

    “There was a fantastic sense that whatever we were doing was right, … that we were winning,” he wrote. “That sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail.”

    This is the sort of sense that abounded when you walked around the offices of Google Australia in Darling Harbour in the middle of this decade. There was an energy about the company. Flush with commercial and technical success from its main search product, and brandishing acclaimed new entries into the Googleverse like Gmail, Google Apps and YouTube, it seemed the company could do no wrong.

    The search giant’s flat structure and focus on technical prowess at all costs, and its extremely flexible staffing arrangements and reward structure — including the famous ’20 percent time’ — meant that Australia’s best and brightest were clamouring to get in the door. And Google was opening that door — with dozens of top-level jobs constantly on offer and a local engineering centre being built, the hype was at an all-time high. Everyone wanted in.

    But — as with that glorious era in San Francisco, all good things must come to an end. And so the term ‘Xoogler’ was born.

    “We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave,” wrote Thompson in the same book. “So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark — that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.”

    The departures of Vale and Rasmussen from Google Australia’s ranks are one small part of that wave rolling back inside the company. Google is a company that came very close to being a corporate utopia — and failed.

    To understand this statement, we need to examine the pair’s personal histories within Google — and what could have forced them to leave.

    Vale could most easily be described as the soul of the search giant’s Australian operation. When Google entered Australia in 2002, it was Vale that was the company’s first employee, and it’s not hard to see why. The executive’s combination of commercial acumen and online knowledge — she was formerly the NSW sales manager for dot com failure Looksmart — and her bright bubbly personality made her the perfect choice to launch what was essentially a startup operation in Australia and build it from the ground up.

    And build she did. Although Google has not disclosed its Australian revenues, they are rumoured to be close to $1 billion. And Vale was the one that laid the commercial foundations for that extraordinary growth over the past decade — step by painful step — in an era where SEO was a black art and targeted advertising meant advertising beauty products to housewives on daytime TV.

    Vale was the executive who brought the new era of internet advertising to Australia — creating a whole eco-system around Google in the process.

    When the time came for Google to appoint more senior leadership in the form of Asia-Pac chief Richard Kimber in 2006 and then local — and virtually invisible — MD Karim Temsamani in 2007, Vale stepped back a bit from the helm of the company — eventually taking a more lightweight role as the local head of Google’s bright and shiny new video toy YouTube.

    As she did with Google Australia as a whole, Vale appears to have achieved remarkable success with the introduction of YouTube into the local commercial advertising and publishing market. When she first took on the role, it appeared YouTube’s main activities locally were attempts to aggregate content published by local organisations like the ABC.

    However, since that time, YouTube’s local focus appears to have switched more to the commercial side of things. A few years ago the site had poor advertising integration with the Australian population. Now it’s common to see an absolute wealth of Australian pre-roll advertisements on the site. Vale can’t take all the credit for that shift — but she can take some.

    The departure of Rasmussen is also significant for the company.

    The fact that the engineer was recruited personally by Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg should give onlookers some indication of the respect with which Rasmussen is held in the global Web 2.0 scene.

    The driving force behind Google Maps, Rasmussen was the public face of the search giant’s Australian engineering operation since his company was acquired by Google in 2004. And, like Vale, Rasmussen has been instrumental in growing Google in Australia — persuading the company’s chiefs in Mountain View to invest in Australian engineers and hiring technical talent, particularly in Sydney, in droves.

    Like Vale, Rasmussen stepped back from that role a little in 2007, when Google appointed serial entrepreneur Alan Noble as the head of its engineering operations locally.

    And, again, like his colleague, Rasmussen appears to have stepped back from higher level management duties to get his hands dirty. He was one of the chief driving forces behind Google’s next-generation Wave product, which ultimately failed — a fate he does not appear to be too happy about. However the development of Wave still brought significant prestige to Australia because of Rasmussen’s efforts.

    Ultimately, if you were speaking to Google in Australia for most of the past decade, it meant you were speaking to either Vale or Rasmussen. It was common for the pair to attend press conferences together — Vale to present for the commercial side of the business, and Rasmussen to explain the expansion of the company’s local engineering talent and products.

    The Sydney Morning Herald is using a photo this week which perfectly illustrates the dynamic between the two. They are standing in what appears to be the kitchen of Google’s Darling Harbour HQ — or maybe the Pyrmont office. They are laughing, Vale’s stance open, Rasmussen more reserved, as many technical people are. There is a link there that is only built up between colleagues who have worked — and fought — together for several years.

    That link remains — in fact, Vale said today she had dined with Rasmussen just last week. Their professional relationship appears to have epitomised the classic marriage between the technical and the commercial, which is so fruitful when it works well — and so disastrous when it tears apart.

    Restless souls like Vale and Rasmussen joined Google Australia to start with because it was a startup. The company offered them something which few other companies could — the chance to make a difference. As Google grew larger and that potential shrunk, both found their niche in an attempt to keep that dream alive.

    Rasmussen dropped away from Google’s engineering management ranks to get his hands dirty in technical matters again with Wave, and Vale essentially formed her own startup with Google’s boundaries, realising the nascent potential of YouTube in the Australian market.

    But their departures signal that they’ve both had enough.

    In short, Google is no longer a startup — it is now a company like any other — and one with a sizable headcount: More than 400 in Australia and 25,000 globally. It is struggling to get new products to market, or even to keep up to date with its existing product set — look at the poor adoption of Google Apps in corporate Australia, for example (because of its lack of local hosting), or the delays pushing its Netbook operating system, Chrome OS, into irrelevance.

    Or even the way that it appears unable to get updates for its Android handsets pushed out through manufacturers in a timely fashion.

    Because of this fact, the company is no longer attractive to entrepreneurial change agent types like Vale and Rasmussen. There is simply too much management inertia.

    This can be seen in the pair’s comments to the Sydney Morning Herald today and yesterday. “The energy there is just amazing, whereas it can be very challenging to be working in a company the size of Google,” Rasmussen said of Facebook.

    “I think Google has become more corporate over the years,” Vale said, noting small companies were easier to shape. “As a company grows it becomes harder to do that … things get slow”.

    How far back the wave has rolled, indeed — those comments would have been unimaginable just half a decade ago.

    Image credit: Google

    submit to reddit

    14 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. jojo
      Posted 01/11/2010 at 7:24 pm | Permalink |

      I don’t understand how you can say Google has lost it’s start-up culture because somebody like Lars Rasmussen is leaving when Google gave him the run of the mill with Google Wave (a product that IS amazingly innovative although it doen’t make much sense for today’s users. Perhaps it will in a few years) and even allowed a keynote presentation of Google Wave at last years Google I/O.

    2. Funny
      Posted 01/11/2010 at 9:06 pm | Permalink |

      You are right that Google is no longer a startup. You are an idiot to think that Google ” is now a company like any other.” You are also an uninformed about the company and their investments in innovation. Next time, write about something you understand.

      • Posted 01/11/2010 at 11:57 pm | Permalink |

        Well, I’ve never worked for Google, but I feel I understand it as well as the next man ;) Covered it in Australia for a long time!

    3. Nice Try
      Posted 02/11/2010 at 6:03 am | Permalink |

      While I applaud the different approach to writing about Google, I would have to vehemently disagree with most of the points that you raise. Calling Google a failure because of the departure of two individuals, or saying that the were on their way to corporate Utopia but failed is short minded. Google is reinvesting in themselves every day in ways that the public doesn’t even know yet. This year, next year and beyond, we’ll see the ext set of products and innovations that wow us once again and remind us that Google is truly a trailblazer in the corporate world and unlike any other. When that does happen, Renai, I expect to see you writing another article stating you were wrong with this one.

      • Posted 02/11/2010 at 7:48 am | Permalink |

        And I’ll be happy to eat my words when that happens :)

        • Erik
          Posted 02/11/2010 at 2:31 pm | Permalink |

          People leave companies for all kinds of reasons, and it hardly denotes an “exodus” or that a company has lost its innovation culture.

          While I don’t know any of the full story about Rasmussen’s departure, it sure looks to me that Google gave him an incredible amount of support with Wave. So why is anyone particularly surprised that he would depart once Google pulled the plug on Wave?

      • Jarrod
        Posted 27/12/2010 at 2:06 pm | Permalink |

        They’ll wow us with boring replicas of successful existing products. Awesome!

        Let me know when Google makes any money or success in anything but search and GMail and I’ll tip my hat to them. Until then, they’re a cashed up teenager blowing money on pointless exercises.

    4. Jon
      Posted 02/11/2010 at 9:58 am | Permalink |

      Just wondering “Nice try” how much do they pay Google PRs these days?

    5. formergoogler
      Posted 03/11/2010 at 12:09 pm | Permalink |

      As an Australian who used to work at Google HQ, I can attest to much of this being true. Let’s not forget it hasn’t been a start-up technically since 2004 when they IPO’d :-). Kids, if you’re a clever engineer, don’t waste your time applying.

      It’s just another big American company, run by HR and legal, and full of head-up-bum borderline personality disorders like this guy, who both stops others from getting work done and gets nothing done themselves: http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/05/a-googler-has-his-tiananmen-square-moment/ (Trust me, I know intimately how difficult that particular person is – they are one reason I left the company, in fact).

      • Posted 05/11/2010 at 9:10 am | Permalink |

        Sad to hear this. I still hold out hope for Google though — seeing it as having more potential than most companies to avoid the pitfalls of bureacracy.

    6. Richard Ure
      Posted 04/11/2010 at 3:38 pm | Permalink |

      But early Facebookers are moving on too? http://goo.gl/kpGJA

      • Posted 05/11/2010 at 9:10 am | Permalink |

        This is what typically happens with early startup employees … when the company becomes large, they leave to help form other startups. There isn’t much challenge in working in a big company … or should I say, it’s a challenge that many people don’t want to tackle ;)

    7. Sean
      Posted 14/02/2011 at 11:30 am | Permalink |

      I have to applaud Renai for putting up with some of the anonymous abusive faceless people posting here on his website. You’re a class act Renai! :)

      • Posted 14/02/2011 at 11:33 am | Permalink |

        hehe cheers Sean — but I’m not worried about it — it comes with the territory ;)




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds — AustralianSuper, CBus, HESTA and more — is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, as was revealed in November, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well, and the Financial Review last week reported that Superpartners is actually close to turfing it altogether and going back to the drawing board.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights