• Catch issues early, fix them fast – Free trial


    [ad] With GFI Cloud you can easily manage and secure your remote workforce – wherever they are, from wherever you are! The simple IT management platform includes patch management, antivirus, web protection, monitoring and remote control. Get the benefit of endpoint protection with the ease of central management. Start a free trial now.


  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Featured, News - Written by on Friday, February 12, 2010 10:05 - 10 Comments

    Anonymous: Attacks better than signing a petition

    A spokesperson for the loose coalition of individuals who attacked Federal Government websites this week to protest against the internet filtering policy today acknowledged some thought the attacks were juvenile, but said they sent more of a message than “signing a petition”.

    The group this week knocked the website of the Australian Parliament offline in a distributed denial of service attack that also targeted the website of Communications Minister Stephen Conroy’s Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy.

    Government workers were also sent a flood of email with porn enclosed, prank phone calls and dodgy faxes, in an initiative dubbed “Operation Titstorm”.

    “Maybe some people think the attacks are juvenile but it makes more of a message then signing a petition as the attacks can not be ignored,” said an individual claiming to be a spokesperson for the group in an email interview.

    They added they did not feel the attack would completely stop the filter initiative initiative from being cancelled. “However, even if they make the blacklist public I personally will be happy, but there are other people that will not be happy until it is completely destroyed,” the spokesperson said.

    They said the aim of the attack was to make governments everywhere aware that they “can not mess with the internet and not have a backlash”.

    Despite their sentiments about petitions, the spokesperson said the best thing the broader Australian public could do to protest against the filter was to sign the petition of Electronic Frontiers Australia and tell government officials that they disagreed with the policy.

    It’s not the first time Anonymous has attacked government websites; in September last year, the group, which has achieved notoriety for its attacks against the Church of Scientology, temporarily took down several Australian Government websites, including the website of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.

    In response to a question about whether that prior action had had any legal consequences, the spokesperson said the group had not had any reports of legal action, but as every member of Anonymous was an individual, the group had no formal membership and anyone could take part in the protest action, news of legal action against individuals did not always spread.

    In this week’s attack, the individual estimated that there were about 100 people actively participating in the protest, but because of the way Anonymous is organised, it was impossible to tell. Last night, they said, there were at least 480 people in an associated chat room discussing the attack.

    One of Anonymous’ claims is that the government is cracking down on in an inappropriate way on certain types of content online that may not be illegal, but may suggest illegal behaviour — for example pornographic images of women with a certain chest size that may suggest they are below 18. In answer to a question about the veracity of the claim, the spokesperson pointed to government statements and information released by the Australian Sex Party.

    Delimiter also asked the Anonymous spokesperson about their views on the internet meme lolcatz, which, like Anonymous, has been associated with the internet messageboard 4chan. “Lolcatz is great, what is not to love about a cat with a funny caption under it,” they said.

    Note: Delimiter does not have any specific knowledge of the identity of individual members of Anonymous. We simply emailed the operation.titstorm@gmail.com email address listed on Anonymous’ press release earlier this week and received a reply from an individual claiming to be a spokesperson. There are obvious journalistic difficulties with verifying the spokesperson’s identity, however we believe them to be affiliated with Anonymous.

    The spokesperson stressed they personally had not taken part in attacking government websites and was just acting as a spokesperson for Anonymous.

    Image credit: Anynonymoose, Creative Commons 2.0

    submit to reddit

    10 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. carl marx
      Posted 13/02/2010 at 3:00 am | Permalink |

      DDoS and sign a petition imo, no reason for the attacks to stop though – plenty of anons around the place to keep the attacks up for weeks on end

    2. c.j.b
      Posted 13/02/2010 at 3:26 pm | Permalink |

      Editor: please learn the history of 'Anonymous'– the 420chan dropouts responsible for this attack have nothing in common with the 4chan Anonmousii responsible for the Hal Turner & etc. raids.

      "99%" of 4channers were vehemently against this retarded attack. I've got to wonder if the Scientologists have infiltrated this group of script kiddies and making them do stupid things…

    3. c.j.b
      Posted 13/02/2010 at 3:40 pm | Permalink |

      >implying a real 4channer would use 'lolcatz'

      It's "Caturday", ffs.

    4. LarrySDonald
      Posted 13/02/2010 at 3:41 pm | Permalink |

      Wow. Sure AU is famously big breasted, but damn – a law on required breast size in porn? Suits me just fine, but yeah, I think anon is right in saying WTF in a very public way. It won't protect anyone, just make it more socially acceptable to need fully anonymous access (What?!? You looking at child porn and ripping peoples credit cards? – Nah bro I'm not like that I'm just not into the big breast thing and wanting to browse pr0n with 25-30 y/os with AAs – Oh, yeah, ok).

    5. pete
      Posted 13/02/2010 at 4:04 pm | Permalink |

      there's no such thing as a "spokesperson" for anonymous. even if somebody claims to be one. it shouldn't be to hard to figure out, especially for a journalist.

      • Ted
        Posted 13/02/2010 at 5:48 pm | Permalink |

        The thing is that actually understanding the will of Anonymous is beyond most people. It's hard to understand the idea of a bunch of wildly varied people coming together for a cause without allowing themselves to be permanently branded. People often become Anonymous for the explicit purpose of not having to deal with legal repercussions, and who can blame them? They do what they must, because they can.

        This world is sick and dying, to the point where Rorschach's gravelly proclamations are almost optimistic. Who could argue that some of the wrongs in this world could be handled far better through radical action than gentle diplomacy? There are a lot of horrible people in this world, doing horrible things to people, and many of them decide that hiding behind laws is the best way to shield themselves from public scrutiny.

        It works, too — as Aussies, you may not be aware of how powerful Scientology is in parts of USA, or how they tried and partially succeeded in infiltrating our government at many levels ranging from tax handling to legislation, securing themselves a defense against any threats to their business model. The RIAA and MPAA are also great examples. They've made quite a pretty penny suing the American public, both individually and at large, and have managed to completely and totally retard the ability of the creative process to move forward in the USA. Now they're pushing ACTA, trying to do the same thing on the global stage.

        These people are untouchable by normal means, and evil enough to not be swayed by logic and rational argument. You cannot stop them legitimately. As hard as this is to accept, you will not understand Anonymous until you understand this. People are weak, gullible, dumb, panicky animals, and you know it. Anonymous might not be any stronger, but it is certainly less fearful.

        "We do not forgive, we do not forget, expect us" is hardly a terrorist's creed. It is a statement of resolve. We do what we must, because we can. We are the only ones that have agreed that shedding our names and faces gives us back the power to inflict change on the world, and because of that, we must be the ones that go and act on what everybody knows to be right.

        Have you ever watched a group of students in a classroom? The teacher asks for an answer, and all of the apathetic, fearful students sit in silence. Do you know who speaks up? That one kid that is just as afraid as everybody else, but knows that something must be done. That is Anonymous. The pro bono lawyer, the independent grocer, the union representative, these are Anonymous. Although it is certain that Anonymous has done some awful things in the name of getting a cheap laugh, it is also certain that Anonymous has been a positive force in many cases. We have done great things with this mask. Terrible, yes, but great indeed.

    6. Outsider
      Posted 14/02/2010 at 11:54 am | Permalink |

      Wow, I never suspected that Australia had people of such little intellectual power and felt so disenfranchised that they would stoop to these levels. I pity their poor parents as their shame must be unparalleled. Perhaps some counseling and anti-psychotic drugs could be made available to them?

      If it comes out that this group of miscreants have been abused in some way during their childhood, and I suspect they have been, we should all empathize with them and give them the help they are crying out for.

    7. [...] http://delimiter.com.au/2010/02/12/anonymous-attacks-better-than-signing-a-petition/ [...]

    8. [...] via Delimiter – Anonymous: Attacks better than signing a petition. [...]

    9. [...] http://delimiter.com.au/2010/02/12/anonymous-attacks-better-than-signing-a-petition/ [...]




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds — AustralianSuper, CBus, HESTA and more — is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, as was revealed in November, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well, and the Financial Review last week reported that Superpartners is actually close to turfing it altogether and going back to the drawing board.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights