• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Blog, Telecommunications - Written by on Thursday, December 13, 2012 14:39 - 48 Comments

    Reality check: China’s not getting an “NBN”

    blog You wouldn’t believe the number of outraged readers who’ve contacted me today encouraging me to take The Australian newspaper to town for its controversially headlined story in this morning’s edition, entitled “A billion Chinese to get an NBN for a third of the cost of ours”. Well, I could have knocked this one on its head, but Crikey correspondent Bernard Keane has already done an admirable job ahead of me. Keane writes (we recommend you click here for the full article):

    “China isn’t getting an NBN, and it doesn’t cost a third of ours, regardless of what The Australian claims. I want to say something that will shock you: a story in The Australian about the NBN is rubbish. I know. I know. I’ll just wait a few minutes while you pick yourselves up off the floor, dust yourselves off and get over the shock.”

    I don’t think many Delimiter readers would take what News Ltd publications have to say about the NBN that seriously at this point, but just in case you were getting a bit worried about this one, rest easy. The good Bernard’s got your back. Journalistic sanity has been restored. Of course, it wasn’t precisely hard. All Bernard had to do was prove that you couldn’t actually roll out a similar fibre NBN to the whole of China for ~ $12 billion. Not precisely the hardest task, given the size of the country and its population. But then, this kind of maths is beyond many people.

    While we’re at it, we should also point out that this article in The Age this week was also of concern, falsely associating layoffs with the National Broadband Network. But not to worry — telco commentator Michael Wyres has thoroughly debunked that one as well. Honestly. This is almost like playing whack-a-mole, with the moles being mainstream media and the hammer being the independent upstarts who dare write shameful, shameful truth on their own websites. Mainstream media: 0. “Bloggers”: 2. Next!

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Posted 13/12/2012 at 2:51 pm | Permalink |

      [nicholson] They can’t handle the truth! [/nicholson]

    2. Dan
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 2:53 pm | Permalink |

      I would read the full article on Crikey, but there is an offensive “SIGN UP TO UNLOCK THIS ARTICLE” banner preventing me from reading past the third line.

      • Grey Wind
        Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:03 pm | Permalink |

        Same with the article on The Australian, but i suppose i should be thankful for that.

        • bern
          Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:45 pm | Permalink |

          The difference is that the Australian puts the story on the front page of their dead tree edition, putting the idea that “The Chinese are building an NBN, but 100x cheaper!” into the heads of hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom have never even heard of Crikey, let alone would subscribe to it.

        • Goddy
          Posted 14/12/2012 at 4:35 am | Permalink |

          Which is hilarious, because I’m not sure I would be able to resist stabbing someone who openly admitted to paying to read The Australian in the throat to help Evolution do its job.

      • Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:12 pm | Permalink |

        When you sign up you get a 21 day free period, however — so there’s no initial payment required etc.

        • djos
          Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:16 pm | Permalink |

          and then they spam the Shiznit out of you! :-(

          • Bruce H
            Posted 13/12/2012 at 6:31 pm | Permalink |

            Indeed, even when you ask them to stop.

        • Davo
          Posted 13/12/2012 at 7:14 pm | Permalink |

          The problem is that you can’t sign up thanks to the Crikey mail server (www-3.eurekareport.com.au) being configured by a clueless person. Their server does not have correctly matching forward and reverse DNS entries for its IP address so if your mail server bounces the potentially spoofed email source you’ll never be able to register!
          Any mail server that doesn’t have correctly setup DNS entries is clearly set up by a clueless person that probably doesn’t even know how to stop their server being an open relay as well so it should be treated as a spam source.
          As far as I am concerned Crikey is nothing more than another source of spam and should be treated as useless garbage.

      • Matthew
        Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:45 pm | Permalink |

        Do a search in Google for the article.
        Articles referred from Google seem to show the whole story

    3. Paul Grenfell
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:22 pm | Permalink |

      Wheres that Media inquiry” and wheres media watch?
      And reminder to self.. not to read toilet paper.. it smells..

      • djos
        Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:31 pm | Permalink |

        I know what you mean, im truly fed up with the blatantly partisan MSM, the last few weeks of political goings on have only proven that the MSM are incapable of reporting genuine news and conducting real investigations!

        They are a real threat to our Democracy!

        • Paul Grenfell
          Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:39 pm | Permalink |

          Media terrorists?

    4. Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:44 pm | Permalink |

      How can we make a complaint about the factual inaccuracies in this article, I some how doubt a complain to the paper will do anything.

      Any govt body that we can write to?

    5. Soth
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:45 pm | Permalink |

      Renai never make your page a sign up page :)

      Did you know that Australia’s population could fit into China 69 times! Oooh (I’m sure some media will make that into NBN facts/bullcrap)

      • Soth
        Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:49 pm | Permalink |

        Just to reply to myself, did anyone see the speech given by Brian Leveson yesterday about media laws?
        You can find it here if you want – http://australianpolitics.com/

        “Leveson suggested that, in the face of amateur journalists online, the established media might cut corners and behave unethically in order to stay ahead of the game. “It may encourage unethical and, potentially, unlawful practices to get a story,”

        • Paul Grenfell
          Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:59 pm | Permalink |

          Ever tried to make a complaint? Its near impossible.. Even if you are successful, that doesn’t mean a satisfactory retraction.

          • jasmcd
            Posted 14/12/2012 at 11:18 am | Permalink |

            No Retraction is ever satisfactory. They are always around the Bottom of page 47 next to advertisements similar to “earning $527 a day from google”.

    6. Ned Kelly
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 3:56 pm | Permalink |

      Follow this link if you want to read the article but not sign up:


      I googled the article and the link doesn’t request a login. ;)

    7. Mr Creosote
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 4:08 pm | Permalink |

      Renai, what can be done about this type of reporting?
      Alan Jones was forced to go to “fact checking school” (though it appears he got an F). Why arent these journos who are so demonstrably wrong so often, forced to do the same thing?
      Shouldnt ACMA or someone be saying enough is enough? The state of journalism in Australia is just getting worse and worse.

      • Paul Grenfell
        Posted 13/12/2012 at 4:21 pm | Permalink |

        Its a National disgrace and as mentioned above, a threat to democracy and possibly also our economic welfare. I was being kind when i suggested they were Media Terrorists. There has to be a better way of keeping those responsible accountable..

    8. Posted 13/12/2012 at 4:19 pm | Permalink |

      Given the factors of population density, vastly different wage scales, and a very different political climate, it doesn’t surprise me at all that China can do build its fibre network much cheaper and faster.

      I didn’t read the full article or the full rebuttal for the same reasons as others but surely the big take-home point is that The Australian is now telling us that other countries are also building a FTTH network, not a FTTN network? Why on earth would China (and Google) be building FTTH networks if FTTN is so much more cost effective?

    9. Fourbypete
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 4:51 pm | Permalink |

      Is there any way to get a shirt made up that says “The Australian Newspaper prints lies and slander. Visit http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/ For the truth!”? It’s time to take it to the streets!
      All this talk does nothing to educate people of the truth. It’s like I’m back at school, a whole bunch of people who agree with what is the truth and a hand full of know nothing crackpots throwing there illogical backwards two cents in just to stir up trouble.

    10. Markie
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 5:27 pm | Permalink |

      Somebody please do a Facebook link for the Crikey piece…

      Card carrying codgers can’t jump paywalls!

    11. Rod
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 6:02 pm | Permalink |

      This is irritating to the exteme – do not let the truth get in the way of the “reported facts”. I am still irritated by the total lack of intelligence and common sense. READY…. FIRE…. AIM

    12. ungulate
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 6:50 pm | Permalink |

      The lesson to be learnt here is its not just certain individuals or certain media outlets that are involved in this kind of debasement and manipulation. Its the Liberal Party at the core of this behavior.

      It would be hard to maintain the Liberal Party has any decency left in it. That is talking points, manufactured scandals or “broadband” policy have any basis in Truth, given the close collaboration there is between that Party and certain “journalists”.

      Utegate and the Godwin Grech fake emails – Turnbull intimately involved.

      Conspiracy against the Speaker of the Australian Parliament – Not my words but those of a judge.

      And this article from the Un-Australian.

      It’s all part and parcel of the same coordinated strategy.

      • Brendan
        Posted 14/12/2012 at 10:24 am | Permalink |

        It saddens me, greatly, to see an opposition whom could hold the government to the fire, whom could generate great policy to keep them honest (and push for good policy in return) and who could do the job they propose is so very import (lead); instead reduced to a bunch of angry, whiny children, for whom the modus-operandi has become the factually challenged sound-bite, and truly abysmal attempts to destabalise the government.

        That The Australian has become an effective liberal mouthpiece at this point is pretty self evident.

        Turnbull, seems to suggest the industry should be able to build miracles from minor investment; that the supposed white elephant is too much; yet cannot be drawn on how much FttN will cost, or how much, if any investment is to be considered for future last-mile upgrade.

        The industry can’t afford to; it’s too busy competing against itself; the financial offset is only ever gong to be there if it’s a state-funded deployment. The only way Telstra would even consider it is to be handed back a virtually guaranteed long-term monopoly (and they have already moved on).

        And Turnbull is duping people into believing it’s “safe” to vote L/NP, he has our back for the Internets. No, he doesn’t. There’s no last-mile plan. There’s no policy. It’s vague statements to try and stave off close scrutiny.

        It’s really academic. FTTH is the preferred option when the money is on the table. We’re there now. It’s getting done. Money is on the table. If we look at how Telstra has profited off the CAN over the last 50-odd years, we should have zero concern over the NBN.

        When you compare that to tax-based under-funding with far smaller footprint (it has to be smaller, slower and cover less people for less money; we can’t fold space and time yet) how can that be a win, for anyone?

        • nonny-moose
          Posted 14/12/2012 at 2:07 pm | Permalink |

          +1 Brendan. but its even worse than that, in that all this time, they have done nothing in a hung parliament. if it truly were in the Liberal DNA to lead they WOULD have fielded policy, they WOULD have negotiated amendments etc etc. they have been labor-leaning indies but that in no way prevents the possibility they might be convinced otherwise and vote with the Liberals. it would have been a pretty big statement, if they were bothered to make the effort.

          its not like they havent had opportunity to, so its clear they have not done so to continue to play games, rather than getting on with the job of LEADING Australia?

          the papers are bought into it as well, as long as theres sensationalist crap to report they can keep flogging their dead trees editions to the rubes. its funny, that they seem to have sided with the idea of cheerleading them on, in opposition where they can do little, rather than cheerleading them on in power, where the policy lines they prefer might actually be enacted?

          in that sense theyve abdicated their responsibility to opposition, and are just taking up paid tenure in a cushy seat. thats all. and in that sense it irritates me mightily that they continue to be the preferred party – they have in no way earned the right to be the alternative government to my mind, and letting these couchpotatoes have it just because they arent the other blokes is a recipe for future trouble. we’ve seen this movie before: Campbell Newman rode very high electorally because he wasnt Anna Bligh, and look at him now. and with the seats CN won, that mistake will take at least an electoral cycle to fix – Not something i regard as in any way good for Queensland, in any capacity.

    13. Steve Dalby (iiNet)
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 7:00 pm | Permalink |

      Courtesy of the google search above …

      – snip –

      [censored by Renai due to copyright concerns. Sorry Steve. That’s paywalled content.]

      -end snip-

      It seems they are getting what they are paying for. A highly efficient, extremely innovative, customer focussed, cost effective, state owned … oh wait .

    14. Frank
      Posted 13/12/2012 at 7:16 pm | Permalink |

      Ok, just haw many contacted you about this article? One maybe two?

    15. drone
      Posted 14/12/2012 at 12:54 am | Permalink |

      Yeap, that’s how the Murdoch V-th column works:

    16. Marc
      Posted 14/12/2012 at 9:15 am | Permalink |

      So, China is going FTTH yet the Libs still want to push for a backwater solution with FTTN. I bet The Australian wishes they didn’t publish that.

      • Brendan
        Posted 14/12/2012 at 10:27 am | Permalink |

        Blind faith in ideology tends to blind one to facts; in trying to support the Coalition policy plan, they’ve run a story that pretty much debunks it. :)

    17. nick
      Posted 14/12/2012 at 10:29 am | Permalink |

      In terms of our NBN, how much of it is paying off the competitors (Optus, Telstra) so that they don’t compete? (China doesn’t have to do this)
      In terms of our NBN, how much of it is the cost of labour? (China should be considerably cheaper)
      In terms of our NBN, how much of it is the cost of components? (I’d imagine that it would still be cheaper in China -it’s not like Apple components are shipped from the USA/Australia to where it is put together)

      So why are people questioning the cost of an “NBN” in China? Payouts to Optus, Telstra, labour costs and contracts that offer “cost + 20%” should push us way over the edge. Are people surprised? Or did the NBN get a good deal on the Optus cable?

      • nick
        Posted 14/12/2012 at 10:40 am | Permalink |

        I’d also like to add that for the Chinese cities, they are considerably higher densities. Look at the urban sprawl of Melbourne and compare it to say… Beijing. I’ll give you a clue

        Melbourne 2080km2
        Sydney 1687km2
        Brisbane 1603km2
        Perth 964km2
        Beijing 748km2
        Shanghai 746km2

      • Justin
        Posted 14/12/2012 at 11:00 am | Permalink |

        Could you imagine the outrage, if we said we were going to use chinese labour to build the NBN because it would cost half the price :-) We want everything cheap in Australia, using Australian labour, australian manufacturing and paying high wages to australians. Something has to give one day…..

    18. midspace
      Posted 14/12/2012 at 11:30 am | Permalink |

      Why does anyone bother reading The Australian any more if it continues to spout garbage?

      Simply stop reading it.

    19. John
      Posted 14/12/2012 at 11:43 am | Permalink |

      I’m not sure if anyone noticed but the article said that the alleged network would cost the state-owned telcos $10 billion. There was no mention of how much it would cost the government. Details matter.

    20. RyanH
      Posted 14/12/2012 at 1:44 pm | Permalink |

      It seems that the same questions that Turnbull won’t answer in any detail need to be asked of the Chinese before we can compare them. Where will the fibre go, what percentage of homes? Who will own what between the private companies and the government? In China’s case I bet this FTTH is more about the system being more suited to surveillance moving forward.

      I was a little surprised that China had such poor internet to start with but perhaps that is an average figure. When I lived there I was able to get a 1.5mb synchronous line costing me the princely sum of about $120 AU for 12 months (no download limit) with a free movie subscription service and this was in 2004-5. It was so much better than what was available in Australia at the time I couldn’t believe it. I guess it must have been a private network or some kind of prototype (my chinese wasn’t so great – basically “Me want internet, how much?”). My internet was filtered pretty well though by the great firewall, many times news websites just weren’t available.

    21. Posted 14/12/2012 at 8:55 pm | Permalink |

      Of course, it wasn’t precisely hard. All Bernard had to do was prove that you couldn’t actually roll out a similar fibre NBN to the whole of China for ~ $12 billion.

      All very nice, but not particularly relevant.


      Under the Five-Year Plan, the Chinese government will focus heavily on developing the telecommunications infrastructure, with total investments reaching 2 trillion yuan (roughly $300 billion), around 80 percent of which is allocated for broadband development. The big plan? To cover every city in China with the fiber broadband service in three years and convert all copper lines to fiber, China Daily reported.

      So $300 billion divided by 1 billion people is approx $300 per person, but the estimate is 150 million households so $2000 per household (you don’t run fiber to people, you run it to buildings). NBN claims they can do it for $4000 per household and when you consider higher wages in Australia probably not such a huge shock. Lots more highrise buildings in China. Lower wages, etc.

      Mind you, be very careful about state-sponsored economic figures coming out of China, and for that matter, Crikey is not exactly the paradigm of even handed reporting either.

      • djos
        Posted 14/12/2012 at 9:01 pm | Permalink |

        “cover every city in China with the fiber broadband service”

        No mention of the country areas getting fibre, just the cities.

        • Posted 14/12/2012 at 9:14 pm | Permalink |

          Thats no differnt to rural Aus…country isn’t getting fibre either.

    22. Posted 14/12/2012 at 10:09 pm | Permalink |

      Hey everyone,

      apologies, but I’m closing comments here as I’m on vacation from tomorrow and I don’t want to spend a lot of time moderating a hot discussion ;)



  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights