The Federal Government tonight announced that it would not proceed with a funding program which has seen Australian internet service providers provided with grants to offer internet filtering options to customers; citing a lack of interest in the project.

The initiative – dubbed the Voluntary Internet Filtering Grants Program – was established in last year’s budget as part of Labor’s over-arching internet filtering policy, which is also seeing the Government push ahead with plans to mandatorily filter Australia’s internet at the ISP level. However, in budget papers released tonight, the Government revealed the project had proven less than popular – with just $200,000 of available funds of $9.8 million being used in the past 12 months.

“The Government provided $9.8 million in the 2010‑11 Budget to establish the Voluntary Internet Filtering Grants Program to assist internet service providers (ISPs) to offer customers internet filtering options on a commercial basis,” the papers state.

“However, consultation with industry has identified limited interest in the grants due to the increasing range of filtering technologies readily available to online users, including browser and search engine filters, and the decision of the three largest ISPs, which account for over 70 per cent of Australian internet users, to voluntarily filter child abuse sites using a list compiled and maintained by the Australian Communications and Media Authority.”

Several ISPs have offered voluntarily filter broadband connections for some time to Australians, as well as access to internet filtering software which can be installed on users’ PCs. It is not clear to what extent the PC software has been taken up, but the ISP-based offering is known to have seen poor adoption.

Facing strong opposition from the Coalition, the Greens and the general public, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy last year postponed the wider internet filter legislation while a review of the Refused Classification category of content (which the filter is intended to block) was carried out by the Minister for Home Affairs for the consideration of federal and state Attorneys-General.

In October, an official from Conroy’s Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy acknowledged the department was not actively working on the filter project at that time, pending the review, although it was working with the three major ISPs – Telstra, Optus and Primus, which have agreed to voluntarily implement more a limited filter to block child pornography from reachng their consumers, rather than the full Refused Classification category of content.

That more limited voluntary filtering scheme involving Telstra, Optus and Primus, however, is due to kick off in the middle of this year. It is not clear what stage the there ISPs are at with respect to implementing the filtering technology.

Image credit: Maslov Yury, royalty free

Related posts:

1. Budget 2011: Turnbull warns of NBN “charade”
2. Voluntary filtering on track for mid-2011
3. Budget 2011: Govt discloses NBN equity payments
4. Budget 2011: Pensioners get free digital TV
5. Primus may dump voluntary ISP filter

1. Simon Reidy
   Posted 10/05/2011 at 11:32 pm | Permalink | Reply

   Sounds like the beginning of the end for Labor’s stupid mandatory filter. I love the way they are now citing examples of home based filtering as a good alternative, when that’s what opponents of the mandatory filter have been saying all along.

   I can’t see Conroy outright canceling the filter. Rather it will just slowly die away as he discretely backs away from it.

2. Mark Chatel
   Posted 11/05/2011 at 11:20 am | Permalink | Reply

   With any hope the filter idea will disappear.
   Although I would love to see Conroy disappear completely.

   • Simon Reidy
     Posted 11/05/2011 at 11:50 am | Permalink | Reply

     With any luck Conroy will fall through a “portal” (and GlaDOS will make him complete tests for eternity).

     • Renai LeMay
       Posted 11/05/2011 at 12:03 pm | Permalink | Reply

       This would make an incredibly interesting video game.

       • Mark Chatel
         Posted 11/05/2011 at 12:04 pm | Permalink | Reply

         The game would get refused classification. :/

         • Asmodai
           Posted 11/05/2011 at 7:19 pm | Permalink | Reply

           GlaDOS would neck herself after listening to Conroy’s petulant rants for five minutes…

           “I’ve had enough… You suck… Delete selfzzzz……. *boop*”

           Seriously though, is any more evidence needed that this policy is/was/will always be a complete dud??

           Handing out government money can’t even get ISP’s to bite. Gotta love those evidence based policies..

3. NightKhaos
   Posted 11/05/2011 at 7:21 pm | Permalink | Reply

   This doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.

4. Dave Paul Saunders (From Adelaide)
   Posted 18/05/2011 at 11:50 pm | Permalink | Reply

   I use an almost unknown legal real-time encryption software program. When I’m doing my Internet banking and so forth I turn it on. Runs a lot better then T.O.R & works with the majority of most websites. Also makes the IP number as well which is great for keeping personal data and online transactions safe! Easier to encrypt it all on the Windows platform then Mac though unless your a hard core software Macintosh programmer.