Delicious/delimiterau
- The rise of the vendor management office
- NSW Government signs mega data centre deal
- NBN FUD: will Abbott ever learn?
- Telstra cloud pilot in e-health system
- T-Box tension as IPTV boss departs
- Shorten monitoring Game collapse
- Will NSW deliver on its ICT plan?
- Inside NSW's evolving ICT strategy
- WA Education battles SOE funding squeeze
- NBN rollback to cost at least $1.8 billion
Blog - Written by Renai LeMay on Monday, November 15, 2010 9:52 - 1 Comment
The Australian’s still on Conroy’s back
blog Communications Minister Stephen Conroy won’t have been too happy this morning when he picked up his copy of The Australian newspaper — if he still reads it, that is, after his public attacks on the masthead last month.
This morning the newspaper went on the attack against the good minister’s per National Broadband Network project again. I count at least four articles (online and in print) over today and the weekend, The first of which is fair enough — it deals with the same issue we covered this morning regarding a report by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development that appears to go some way towards backing Malcolm Turnbull’s criticisms of the project.
However the paper has gone further — publishing a yarn by its economics editor, Michael Stutchbury, accusing the NBN’s taxpayer return of being “modest at best” and claiming the OECD’s report was “a stinging rebuke” to Labor.
Then there’s an opinion piece by Paul Kerin, a professorial fellow, Melbourne Business School, whose main exposure to the telecommunications sector appears to be from a consulting perspective. Kerin claims Conroy’s “excuses” for not conducting a NBN cost/benefit study of being “nonsense”.
There’s also a report of a warning by the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network that the NBN project was “cumbersome” when it came to providing basic telephone services.
So is The Australian going too hard on Conroy? It’s a question we asked three weeks ago — and judging from the amount of reader responses, the matter is still up for discussion. I think several of the recent pieces are quite valid, but I’m not sure about all of them. But at least it’s creating debate, which is what any major government project needs.
Thoughts?
Image credit: Kriss Szkurlatowski, royalty free
Related posts:
- OECD report: Conroy fires back
- Those Chinese mining hackers are back
- Technology ministers strongly back Gillard
- BACK OFF, Quigley tells Turnbull, media:
The NBN hasn’t been hacked - NBN: Lawyer tells Australians to
“get off the internet and go outside”
| Tweet | |
![]() |
1 Comment
Leave a Comment
Enterprise IT, News - May 17, 2012 15:20 - 0 Comments
Microsoft beats Salesforce to utility CRM deal
More In Enterprise IT
- NSW finalises colossal datacentre consolidation
- Two good Australian CIO interviews
- Three lessons ING’s private cloud teaches us
- SAP considers Aussie datacentre
- How much more do servers cost in Australia?
Photo Galleries, Telecommunications - May 17, 2012 12:14 - 23 Comments
Pristine Telstra network photos: We sourced our own
More In Telecommunications
- NBN no CommBank or Qantas, says Hockey
- NBN debate not about technology, says Turnbull
- No pristine photos: Telstra rejects copper challenge
- Politicos reject NBN referendum idea
- We’re not shutting down T-Box, says Telstra
Blog, Gadgets - May 17, 2012 15:38 - 0 Comments
Will Telstra skip Nokia’s Lumia 900?
More In Gadgets
- New BlackBerry OS 7.1 hits Australia
- ASUS Transformer Pad tablet hits Australia
- HTC One XL on sale: Compatible with Telstra 4G
- Optus a “disgusting” company, says AFL chief
- GAME Australia goes into administration
Reviews - May 7, 2012 18:16 - 2 Comments
Telstra Mobile Wi-Fi 4G: Review
More In Reviews
- Samsung Galaxy S III: Preview
- HTC Titan II 4G: Preview
- Nokia Lumia 710: Review
- Sony Xperia S: Review
- Samsung Omnia W: Review








sponsored post ING Direct recently implemented a private cloud solution to virtualise its entire banking platform, allowing it to provision a new copy of itself -- a so-called 'bank in a box' -- within minutes. 
Renai LeMay asks: “So is The Australian going too hard on Conroy?” Wherever huge amounts of public money is being spent, the public has the right to transparency. Conroy utterly refuses to submit the expenditure to a cost-benefit analysis – primarily, it now seems, because such an exercise is likely to produce a ‘fail’ outcome by normally accepted standards. His stance simply amounts to a blockage of transparency. If I was the editor of The Australian and I saw all other newspapers going silent on the issue (perhaps for fear of losing government largesse or favour?), I would certainly adopt an editorial policy that favoured transparency. Maybe this means that Conroy has a hard time, but he is a big boy. His party faction is renowned for delivering hard knocks to its opponents.
Ross Kelso
Director of the Australian Communications Action Network
(the above views do not necessarily reflect those of ACCAN as a whole)