Featured, News - Written by Renai LeMay on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 1:07 - 1 Comment
Mario piracy nets Queenslander $1.5m fine
Nintendo has successfully sued a Queensland resident for uploading to the internet a copy of its Wii game New Super Mario Bros a week before its Australian release in November last year.
The Queenslander — named by multiple media outlets as James Burt — has been ordered by the Federal Court to pay Nintendo $1.5 million, according to a statement by the Japanese games manufacturer of the Mario and Zelda titles.
“This legal proceeding was commenced to protect the creative rights and innovation of game developers, and to combat the growing international problem of Internet piracy,” said Nintendo in a statement. The $1.5 million fine consists of damages to compensate Nintendo for what it said was its loss of sales revenue caused by Burt’s actions.
Nintendo said it used “sophisticated technological forensics” to identify Burt. The company obtained a Federal Court search order on 23 November to inspect Burt’s residence. “This led to the seizure of property from those premises in order to gain further evidence against the individual,” Nintendo said.
In a wider sense, Nintendo said it would pursue anyone who breached its intellectual property rights “using all means available to it under the law”.
The company said game piracy was a “significant threat” to its business, as well as that of game developers producing games for its consoles. “Fewer sales of Nintendo’s hardware and software systems means fewer resources that Nintendo, its licensees, developers and publishers have to create and market new video game products which is ultimately to the detriment of video game enthusiasts,” the company said.
“When there is a decrease in game development, there is also a decrease in the number of jobs in the industry. The existence of piracy jeopardises the strength of the video game industry overall.”
Image credit: Nintendo
Related posts:
1 Comment
Leave a Comment
Opinion - Jul 28, 2010 15:33 - 3 Comments
iPhone 4: Is a Telstra plan worth the money?
More In Opinion
- BigPond broadband is cheap as chips
- Not the Twitter election you were expecting
- Open government: By the people, for the people
- How can Australia build a great technology sector?
- How long can Atlassian stay Australian?
Features, Reviews - Jul 16, 2010 14:01 - 22 Comments
Amazon Kindle store + device: The Australian difference
More In Features
- BoysTown achieves the Lotus position — without Exchange
- Virtual desktop reality: City of Cockburn’s fleet of 200
- 2010: Australia’s Android odyssey
- The day of the spill: Australia’s tech sector reacts
- Tech products I can’t live without






I’m kind of happy about this outcome although I would like to know:
1. What these “sophisticated technological forensics” are; and
2. How they determined the amount, as long as the amount is equal to losses then fine (no pun intended).
However i thought I read somewhere that a settlement was reached, so wouldn’t that mean Nintendo determined the amount not the courts? (so Nintendo imposed, Court enforced)