The ABC didn’t sack Bitcoin miner


news The Australian Broadcasting Corporation didn’t fire an un-named IT worker who attempted to use the broadcaster’s vast server infrastructure to make himself a fortune through the Bitcoin virtual currency system, it has emerged, with the employee merely being disciplined and having their access to certain IT systems restricted.

In June last year, as reported by the Sydney Morning Herald and Crikey, the broadcaster discovered that an IT worker had set up the Bitcoin mining software on a number of ABC systems in order to generate the currently. Bitcoin is a decentralised virtual currency that uses a series of key technologies such as peer to peer networking, digital signature and encryption to function. Users can ‘mine’ for Bitcoins using computer resources.

At the time, it was reported that the ABC was investigating the issue, following the discovering of the inappropriate use of the broadcaster’s IT infrastructure. This morning, Liberal Senator Eric Abetz published the result of questions he had filed with the ABC in relation to the issue.

The result of the investigation, the ABC told Abetz, was that the employee was disciplined. “Their access to all production systems has been restricted,” the broadcaster added, and “the employee is being closely supervised by their manager”. The placement of the Bitcoin mining code onto the ABC’s servers had been detected by internal ABC checks “within 30 minutes”, the ABC said, and was removed immediately. The IT worker themselves had been able to set up the system because they had “high-level IT access privileges”.

The ABC stipulated that its Grandstand Sports website was affected by the Bitcoin operation for a short period, but there was no further impact on the broadcaster’s website or its distribution operations. “There was no impact on the ABC’s internal and external online distribution infrastructure,” it added. “As this software was for a short time embedded within pages on the ABC website, visitors to these pages may have been exposed to the Bitcoin software, however it is not possible for the ABC to ascertain whether any audience computers were affected by Bit coin software. The ABC has not received any complaints from audience members as a result of this Bitcoin code.”

Despite the large amount of processing resources the ABC uses, the Bitcoin mining was “ineffective” and did not actually generate any Bitcoins, the broadcaster noted. “The ABC is cognisant of its responsibilities with regards to IT security,” it said. ABC IT systems continue to scan the ABC’s equipment for vulnerabilities and all users of ABC’s internet technologies are bound by ABC security policies and codes of practice.” A spokesperson for Abetz noted that the Coalition was planning on quizzing the ABC further about the issue, including filing a request for the code that would have been downloaded to users’ machines.

While most Australian organisations allow some use of their computing resources for personal use (such as web browsing on a work desktop PC), it is likely that the IT staffer’s efforts to use the ABC’s IT resources for Bitcoin mining violated common IT industry codes of ethics. The Systems Administrators Guild of Australia, for example, has an ethical code stating that members must seek to prevent unauthorised use of the systems overseen by their members.

There’s not really much to say here, apart from that we’re surprised that the ABC has not terminated the employment of the individual concerned in this case. This was a clear misuse of the organisation’s IT systems for personal gain, and had the potential to make the individual a significant amount of money if the plan had succeeded.

Given their high level of access (we’re sure they had root on the IT systems concerned), it does seem surprising that the ABC’s own detection systems were able to sniff out the Bitcoin mining code so quickly. You’d think, if the staffer concerned had that level of access, that they would have been aware of the detection systems.


  1. If every company/department terminated people for “misuse of the organisation’s IT systems for personal gain” we’d have massive unemployment in the IT industry.

    This guy was an idiot – pure and simple. He put no thought into how he could get the servers to run the software in “stealth mode”, not affecting anything else and therefore deserved to be caught.

    • So what, you’re saying that his only fault was getting caught? I don’t think so. What he did was wrong and puts the IT profession into ill repute.

      • I really don’t think he should of lost his job over this, it wouldn’t surprise me if he’s been put on a very short leash.

        Also ‘IT Profession’? I know the IT industry is working hard to make itself be called a ‘Profession’ but it isn’t at this stage.

        • why wouldn’t it be called a ‘profession’?? what is your definition of a ‘profession’ and why doesn’t IT fit?

          very confusing statement, i must say, and not the least bit insulting to many of us in the IT profession.

          • pro·fes·sion/prəˈfeSHən/
            A paid occupation, esp. one that involves prolonged training and a formal qualification.

            You don’t have to have a formal qualification to do IT.

            Being a Nurse is a profession, I just can’t walk into a job of being a Nurse. But I can just walk into the job of working in IT if I can prove I’ve got the skill set.

          • plenty of IT-related jobs require formal qualifications (or certifications). not all, i admit, but plenty still do.

            you’ve just described 3/4’s of the jobs in the world.

            still don’t get the point of the comment when it doesn’t really have any relevance in the context of the article.

            but whatever floats your boat…

          • There is no body in IT that stipulates that you must have a certain tertiary qualification to undertake any activity. Unlike in a ‘profession’ like Medicine, Law etc etc, where you actually have to have a specific degree from a recognised institution to practice. Some employers may have requirements for a particular degree, but almost always this is able to be bypassed with sufficient experience instead.

            But of course this is really nit picking. You can describe yourself as a professional, but under the definition it isn’t ‘a profession’ unless it is a requirement. And it isn’t. Ironically, it’s the fact that you’re allowed to call yourself an IT professional with no qualifications that makes it not a profession. You can’t call yourself a Dentist without the appropriate qualifications for example.

            Anyway, sacking is really for people that intend theft or damage to property, for people that are stupid, well, I’d dare say the majority of the country would be unemployed.

          • Actually I cannot think of an IT job that requires any tertiary qualifications or certifications. Not by law. You need them to be paid under certain awards but employers are free to hire anyone for any position. Then again qualifications aren’t all they are cracked up to be. I know plenty of “programmers” who did there 3 or 4 year degree and couldn’t program for shit. It’s really something they have to want to learn and be good at. Just attending classes and passing tests doesn’t necessarily give them the mind set required to program.

        • “I know the IT industry is working hard to make itself be called a ‘Profession’ but it isn’t at this stage.”

          Yes it is. There are qualifications you can do, a career path, different areas of specialisation, professional groups such as the ACS and SAGE-AU which you can join, other specific industry associations such as the SAP and Oracle user groups. Working in IT is a profession like any other — especially like the other white collar professions (medicine, accountancy, legal and so on). ‘IT professional’ is probably the term most often used to describe Delimiter readers, in fact.

          • Unfortunately the term IT is a little broad. When I first started programming in the 80s, there were programmers, analyst, system admins and data entry operators and that was about it. Then the term IT started to be used for anyone who touched a computer. More often than not someone with the job title IT professional changed printer cartrudges. These days it is still just as broad. In an industry that has so many specialisations I would be suspicious of someone describing themselves as an IT professional.

            There are qualifications and cerifications you can do, but, they are not mandatory. Someone can be employed in IT with no formal qualifications, for better or worse. Some organisations insist of formal qualifications and for foreign employees to undergo ACS certification to make sure they are suitably qualified and experienced. Without some form of tertiary qualification in IT, engineering or the likes or ACS certification you are not covered by the Professional employee’s award and are classed and fall under the general catch all base award.

          • When people say particular jobs in IT require qualifications, those might be professions, but it doesn’t make IT as a ‘whole’ a profession. I’m not aware of any IT jobs that absolutely definitely require any tertiary degree level qualifications. IT is broad, like business, or science.

          • Agreed. I personally don’t like the term IT. Way too broad. I could also say I work in manufacturing or the building industry. You could be anything from a bricky to an engineer or architect and say you work in the building industry.

  2. Unprofessional. Unethical. The ABC hires certified amateurs, so-called “Experts” on paper recognised and preferred by recruitment industry, with a certifying side business.

  3. There seems to a distinct split in society.
    On the one hand, criminals are incarcerated for the purpose of rehabilitation, and correcting the behaviour of the individuals.
    Yet, when a Politician does something wrong, we insist they leave their seat, quit their party, or cease working in politics.
    The same can be said of this ABC IT worker. Why must be sacked?

    When have we stopped giving people a second chance?
    When have we stopped giving people a chance to learn from their mistakes?
    When have we stopped re-educating, or teaching people to do the right thing?
    Should not individuals be made to clean up their mistakes, and learn from the process what harm they have caused to others?

    Or in the future are we going to become a society that simply avoids all direct responsibility of our actions, by pulling out a dagger and ripping open our stomachs in ritual seppuku?

    Renai. “generate the currently” should be “generate the currency”.

  4. Given their high level of access (we’re sure they had root on the IT systems concerned), it does seem surprising that the ABC’s own detection systems were able to sniff out the Bitcoin mining code so quickly. You’d think, if the staffer concerned had that level of access, that they would have been aware of the detection systems.

    At a guess, the bitcoin software triggered an alert for crossing some kind of CPU usage threshold. It’s possible the staff member involved had access to only a subset of systems, and may even have been unaware of the monitoring systems. It certainly wasn’t a very bright move.

    As this software was for a short time embedded within pages on the ABC website, visitors to these pages may have been exposed to the Bitcoin software

    This is *far* more serious than just an abuse of organisational IT resources. This person attempted to use the computing resources of visitors to an ABC website, not just internal servers. If this wasn’t actually a criminal offence, it sounds like it came very close. It should have been a career-ending move.

  5. “As this software was for a short time embedded within pages on the ABC website, visitors to these pages may have been exposed to the Bitcoin software”

    That sounds somewhat odd. Was the guy running a bitcoin miner on (some of) the ABC’s servers, or was did he embed a javascript bitcoin miner into some ABC web pages? The latter seems a lot worse, because in that case he was not just abusing his employer’s infrastructure, but also abusing his employer’s relationship with their users.

    • It definitely sounds like a Javascript miner to me..

      Person is most likely a Web dev with deploy permissions to just the ABC Grandstand Sports site.

      Be interesting to see what caught it. An obvious one would be an inquisitive ABC website visitor catching the code when noticing his CPU usage went nuts.. then notifying ABC immediately

      But yeah, this is VERY bad because it was not just an attempt to use his company’s resources but also the general public.

      Even if the employee had permission from ABC management it would’ve probably been considered illegal in the eyes of the law

      • “Software on a web-server” could = “software on the website” to the none IT person writing the press release.

  6. This is a horrifying blight on the reputation of the whole ABC and a major betrayal of the trust of colleagues and audience.
    This person (who’s identity is a very poorly kept secret) should not have been able to remain in their position.

    Beyond the IT angle, misusing corporation resources for profit is gross misconduct let alone misusing ABC audiences for profit. And attempting to commit a crime is still a crime, is it not?

    Potentially more frightening and shameful is that this person’s supervisor (and they’re supervisors) seem incompetent (or unwilling) to comprehend the seriousness of this situation. This senior manager has had other persons removed from ABC premises for lesser IT policy infractions (and in truth should themselves be scandalised in their own right for other reasons).

    The Australian people, Mark Scott and the rest of the ABC have been very poorly served by these people’s advice on this and other issues involving

    PS. For what it’s worth the alleged is very unlikely to have had root on the servers

  7. Poor bloke is probabley young and stupid. Poor than likely they have a poor access level setup, where if you fill an it role, you get domain admin access. This will only make them wake up to the fact that it needs review.

    Also, 30 minutes to find it, hogwash.. More likey 30 minutes for the guy to tell someone, who told someone else, who dobbed him in for obvious reasons like “wish I had thought of that”.

  8. Apparently someone else used his username and password to impersonate the young fella while installing the dodgy code. That’s the story I got from Craig Thomson anyhow…

  9. Sounds like a JavaScript miner. I saw these back in the days of the bitcoin bubble.
    He doesn’t necessarily have administrative access to the machines, he is more likely to be a web developer that has access to update the site as someone else mentioned here.
    It may have been noticed in code review, or more likely was a JavaScript cross site script reference that pointed at a non SSL website, probably caused “insecure items detected” messages when trying to log in to the site.

  10. I agree with those above, that although silly to do, it was also a harmless excercise. If it was causing resource contention issues on Production servers, that isn’t harmless, but it would inevitably be picked up and removed.

    Silly, but not serious enough to fire someone over. Anyone stating that abusing IT policy is a serious offence better not be reading this site whilst at work…

  11. I’m astounded at the emotional response from people on here. From what it sounds it was a very basic javascript miner. Last I checked topped out at a few MH/s. That’d mean a good 100,000 visitors would struggle to make him $10.

    I highly doubt he would be able “to make himself a fortune ” off of that.

    The dude did something dumb, predominantly harmless and entirely reversible. And he should be hanged, drawn and quartered for it? Get real…

  12. Only two industries that have ‘users’ – I.T. and drug distribution.

Comments are closed.