• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites


  • Renai's other site: Sci-fi + fantasy book news and reviews
  • RSS Renai LeMay

  • Blog, Security - Written by on Tuesday, September 11, 2012 16:21 - 17 Comments

    Coalition party room erupts with data retention dissent

    blog Well, well. Looks like Coalition MPs in general are not as disinterested in the Federal Government’s controversial data retention and surveillance proposal as has been previously believed. The Australian newspaper (we recommend you click here for the whole article) reports that the Coalition’s party room virtually erupted in anger over the proposals in a large meeting this morning. The newspaper reports:

    “A dozen Coalition MPs warned against the proposal as a restriction on civil liberties in an important signal of support for a growing online campaign against the changes.”

    As we alluded to yesterday, this is the same pattern of behaviour which we saw with respect to Labor’s similarly controversial mandatory Internet filtering policy — first there is silence from the Opposition, then, once it becomes clear that there is widespread public opposition to the plan amid a hostile response from the media, the Opposition debates the issue internally, and then finally comes to a formal public view rejecting the Government’s view on the issue. The only difference this time around appears to be that the process has been dramatically sped up. We’ve seen this kind of thing before … and this time around we know how to block this kind of objectionable proposal. Democracy is becoming more responsive.

    Print Friendly

    17 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Tinman_au
      Posted 11/09/2012 at 4:56 pm | Permalink |

      It’s just a discussion paper designed to get feedback at the moment isn’t it?

      I think Nicola should pay very close attention to the feedback she’s getting…

      • Posted 11/09/2012 at 5:15 pm | Permalink |

        I think Roxon has been very surprised at the extreme levels of antagonism she has encountered on this one.

        • SMEMatt
          Posted 12/09/2012 at 11:57 am | Permalink |

          Roxon only have has herself to blame, her seemingly flippant responses to objections has pushed this into the something the Coalition can used for easy political points. I have no doubt if it wasn’t for the easy positive press they could score off this they wouldn’t be bleating about it.

      • Posted 13/09/2012 at 6:41 pm | Permalink |

        @tinman

        Yes, It’s just an inquiry at the moment. But it has been widely publicised and I think Roxon has been taken aback at the mass of credible opposition the tech media has drummed up.

        Frankly, I vaguely supported the ideals behind the proposals, with the right safeguarding in place against misuse (as my submission to the inquiry stated). But with the increasingly weak and misleading responses from Roxon et al. I think it’s time they either rethink this or massively water down the proposals.

        Poorly handled Roxon, poorly handled.

      • Harimau
        Posted 13/09/2012 at 7:40 pm | Permalink |

        http://i.imgur.com/ap7rV.png

    2. Goddy
      Posted 11/09/2012 at 5:24 pm | Permalink |

      And so she should. I hope she cops the biggest belting of her political career, because it is a disgrace.

    3. Chillienet
      Posted 11/09/2012 at 7:09 pm | Permalink |

      ” The Australian newspaper (we recommend you click here for the whole article)”

      No can do. It requires a log in.

      • Trev
        Posted 11/09/2012 at 8:38 pm | Permalink |

        Just Google the first sentence or so..

    4. Soth
      Posted 12/09/2012 at 10:22 am | Permalink |

      Ah yes this will cost votes :|

      • Annoying Old Fart
        Posted 14/09/2012 at 3:05 pm | Permalink |

        So? Will those votes move to parties or candidates with half a brain, or will they cycle around to the Coalition? Which won’t have a substantially different view, just be more sly about writing off our privacy.

    5. Tim
      Posted 12/09/2012 at 10:53 am | Permalink |

      The kind of draconian restrictions of privacy that these laws bring are a disgrace. You can argue they are small infirngement on civil liberty but they are frankly uneccessary, the judical system should not be allowed to monitor the citizens of a nations as a matter of course but rather have reason to do it in the first place.

      The NBN is a great piece of forward thinking, this law is two steps back from those three steps forward from that.

    6. Stephen
      Posted 12/09/2012 at 3:53 pm | Permalink |

      Well, if the Coalition decides not to support the bill it’s dead. Until the next attempt.

    7. Poo Bare
      Posted 12/09/2012 at 4:06 pm | Permalink |

      Ahhh the “meeee tooo” mentality.

      You don’t want crime on the internet, but you don’t want do do what it takes to be stopping it.

      Fuckwits.

      Lets read the papers and grow a brain – and lap up all the “sensationalised news” designed to sell news papers, instead of reading the actual material, and saying, “Is this a good way to make the world better, wholly, partly, which bits and which not bits? – What are my own opinions, based upon my own experience?”

      What? None? You never read the report – your a fuck wit.

      • Harimau
        Posted 13/09/2012 at 7:35 pm | Permalink |

        I don’t consider an invasion of my privacy a way to make the world better. Why, do you? (An invasion of your privacy, that is.)

        Also, government agencies already have sufficient powers to fight internet crime without treating the entire online population of Australia as potential suspects in potential crimes.

        So, in conclusion, we don’t want crime on the internet, and we are already doing what it takes to stop it.

      • Annoying Old Fart
        Posted 14/09/2012 at 3:09 pm | Permalink |

        Interesting… what, in your view, would it take to stop it? Thousands of years of laws and policing haven’t stopped crime in shops or streets, what makes you think the Internet will be any different?

    8. Dave
      Posted 12/09/2012 at 8:00 pm | Permalink |

      The Coalition and the Murdoch press disagree with the Government, how novel.




  • Get our weekly newsletter

    All our stories, just one email a week.

    Email address:


    Follow us on social media






    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • ASD releases Windows 8 hardening guide windows-8-1

      The Australian Signals Directorate appears to have released a guide to hardening Microsoft’s Windows 8 operating system, three years after the software was released for use by corporate customers, and as Microsoft is slated to release its next upgrade, Windows 10.

    • ASG picks up $35m CIMIC IT services deal money

      Perth-headquartered IT services group ASG this week revealed it had picked up a deal worth at least $35 million over five years with CIMIC Group — the massive construction and contracting group previously known as Leighton Holdings.

    • Datacom completes mammoth Health ICT takeover UTP Cat5e Cable with patch panel

      New Zealand-headquartered IT services group Datacom this week announced it has successfully taken over the ICT infrastructure of the Federal Department of Health, in a long-awaited move which has seen the department remove large tranches of work from the hands of long-term outsourcer IBM.

    • Weather bureau gets $80m Cray supercomputer cray

      The Bureau of Meteorology this week revealed it had signed a US$59 million (AU$80 million) contract with US supercomputer specialist Cray for a beefy machine that will deliver the agency about 16 times its current computing capacity and allow it to predict the weather that much better.

    • Vic Govt instantly blows $4.4m on Windows 2003 burning-money

      The Victorian Government has paid Microsoft a whopping $4.4 million for extended support for the now-defunct Windows Server 2003 operating system, in a move which sharply demonstrates the extreme cost of running operating systems which are no longer formally supported by their vendors.

  • News, Policy + Politics - Jul 27, 2015 19:32 - 2 Comments

    Brandis “alarmed” over Labor’s data retention review

    More In Policy + Politics


    Enterprise IT, News - Jul 27, 2015 15:16 - 6 Comments

    ASD releases Windows 8 hardening guide

    More In Enterprise IT


    Industry, News - Jul 27, 2015 14:20 - 2 Comments

    iiNet shareholders vote ‘yes’ for TPG buyout

    More In Industry


    Blog, Consumer Tech - Jul 27, 2015 14:00 - 4 Comments

    Oops … Tesla enthusiast charges car on Qld windfarm

    More In Consumer Tech