• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • News, Startups - Written by on Monday, April 23, 2012 12:03 - 3 Comments

    Airtasker startup wins $1.5m in funding

    news Australian startup Airtasker has secured $1.5 million in funding, according to a media release issued last week by the company.

    Airtasker founder and CEO, Tim Fung said that this fresh round of cash injection would be utilised to hire engineers to further enhance the website’s functionality, to add premium user profiles, improve messaging systems and to install new safety mechanisms around the site. In addition, Airtasker aims to use the newly acquired funds to improve its mobile capabilities with GPS integration and an Android app.

    Airtasker raised this capital within months of its launch in Sydney. The company is set to commence operations in Melbourne later this month, with further nationwide expansion set to follow shortly.

    Airtasker, the brainchild of web entrepreneurs Fung and Jonathan Lui, is based on collaborative consumption – a concept fast gaining ground where community members share resources directly with each other online, including holiday accommodation (like AirBnB) and car rentals (like Zimride). Airtasker is pitched as a social marketplace where people can outsource everyday tasks to reliable ‘runners.’ The company’s mission is to connect people who need home errands and handyman jobs done, with people who want to earn some extra cash doing these errands and tasks in their local community.

    The two-person company raised an initial $140,000 seed funding from internet investors and entrepreneurs and this was sufficient to build a website and kick-start the online community marketplace in February 2012. The new round has come from local investment house Bridge Lane Capital and others, although Airtasker wasn’t prepared to disclose the other investors.

    Airtasker’s business model is to charge a small fee ($2 plus 5 per cent of task value) to the ‘runner’ when a task is completed while it’s totally free to post a task with no added fees for getting a task done. On the pricing, Fung maintains that they wanted to make the business model a winning proposition for everyone in the community. He said: “This way we’re totally aligned with our community members as we only ever make money when they make money.”

    Hundreds of tasks were posted in the first few weeks of Airtasker’s launch and scores of people joined the Airtasker community. Last month, as part of a publicity stunt, Airtasker was in the news when one of its runners camped outside the Apple store for five days to line up for the first iPad from Apple’s flagship Sydney store.

    According to Fung, Airtasker’s dual priorities currently include maintaining the tempo of continuous and swift expansion of the company’s capabilities and audience. He said, “If we keep our users happy, then we know the community will continue to grow as word-of-mouth has driven our growth to-date.” He reiterated that Airtasker was working on spreading the word to educate Aussies about how they could improve their lives or businesses by outsourcing mundane chores and errands.

    To be honest, I feel that the amount of money invested in Airtasker is too high, given the fact that the company’s business model just does not see it making much money at the moment.

    If you look at Airtasker’s front page, the jobs posted so far cost between $25 and $50 each. That would mean, for a $50 job, that Airtasker would make $2 worth of flat fees, plus five percent of $50 — for a total of $4.5 per job. And on $25 jobs, for example, it would make even less. Sure, there are some tasks which are larger, but they’re not that much larger — I saw a few at $250 (which would net Airtasker $14.5 in fees and some at $500, which would net the company $27 in fees.

    In order to meet the right levels of scale to justify the huge levels of capital invested in it, Airtasker will need to start reaching many, many cities globally, and achieving high levels of uptake. It will need to go viral. And the nature of such Web 2.0 startup platforms is if they don’t go viral quickly, they often don’t go viral in the long term.

    It seems like in Airtasker’s case, the company’s early success, with having quite a few Sydney jobs posted on its site, combined with its founders’ history in raising capital, have combined in order to net it a large early stage investment. And of course, it is a very positive signal for Australia’s startup ecosystem that such amounts are being raised locally. But to my mind, Airtasker has a lot to prove yet before I would judge that investment worthy. I’ve seen far more promising Australian startups struggle to raise anything like this amount. If Airtasker succeeds wildly, I will be the first to eat my words. But until then, call me a cynic.

    Image credit: Airtasker. Opinion/analysis by Renai LeMay.

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Simon Reidy
      Posted 23/04/2012 at 3:08 pm | Permalink | Reply

      That is a shitload of money for a startup! Its a pretty cool idea and best of luck to them, but I agree that’s a hell of an investment. Sounds like there’s quite a few investors with various equities at stake, who will all expect a return in their lifetime. Makes me nervous just thinking about it.

    2. Posted 23/04/2012 at 6:59 pm | Permalink | Reply

      But it also goes to show how collaborative consumption has really taken off. people dealing with people is no longer just a good idea, its reality, and its great we can trust each other once again.

      We’re doing the same with sharemystorage.com; where people with spare space allow people looking for storage space to store.

    3. Douglas
      Posted 26/04/2012 at 10:13 am | Permalink | Reply

      Yeah, you’d have to think with their current business model the payback period on $1.5M is going to be bloody long!

      Maybe their strategy is to build up a user base, add some advertising and flog it off.

      Very similar concept to taskrabbit in the US, and taskbox in AU.


    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights