• Enjoy the freedom to innovate and grow your business

    [ad] With Microsoft Azure you have hybrid cloud flexibility, allowing your platform to span your cloud and on premise data centre. Learn more at microsoftcloud.com.

  • IT Admin: No Time to Save Time?

    [ad] Do you spend too much time patching machines or cleaning up after virus attacks? With automation controlled from a central IT management console accessible anytime, anywhere – you can save time for bigger tasks. Try simple IT management from GFI Cloud and start saving time today!

  • Free Forrester analysis of CRM solutions

    [ad] In this 25 page report, independent analyst house Forrester evaluates 18 significant products in the customer relationship management space from a broad range of vendors, detailing its findings on how CRM suites measure up and plotting where they stand in relation to each other. Download it for free now.

  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Reader giveaway: Google Nexus 5

    We’re big fans of Google’s Nexus line-up in general at Delimiter towers. Nexus 4, Nexus 7, Nexus 10 … we love pretty much anything Nexus. Because of this we've kicked off a new competition to give away one of Google’s new Nexus 5 smartphones to a lucky reader. Click here to enter.

  • Gadgets, News - Written by on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 20:03 - 20 Comments

    ACCC sues Apple over “misleading” 4G iPad claim

    news Australia’s competition regulator will tomorrow (Wednesday) take iconic technology giant Apple to court for advertising its new iPad tablet as featuring “4G” speeds — which are not supported on Australian telecommunications networks.

    One of the key features of the new iPad is support for 4G speeds, which will allow users in countries such as the US and Canada to access the Internet much faster than the traditional 3G mobile broadband speeds which have become very widely used internationally over the past half-decade.

    However, the 4G speeds which the new iPad supports will not be available in Australia, with Apple’s technical specifications page only listing it as supporting the 700Mhz and 2100Mhz spectrum bands, neither of which are being used in Australian telcos to provide 4G services. Telstra and Optus’ existing 4G rollouts are based on the 1800Mhz spectrum, although Optus is also planning a rollout in the 2.3GHz band. 4G is a term used to describe the next generation of wireless broadband services, which will allow speeds up to levels such as 100Mbps — far beyond the current generation of 3G services.

    Apple Australia’s dedicated page for the new iPad currently states: “Designed with next-generation wireless technology, the new iPad with Wi-Fi + 4G connects to fast data networks around the world. So you can download content, stream video and browse the web at amazing speeds.”

    However, if you click through to the features page for the new iPad, Apple has much more explicitly laid out what speeds the device supports in Australia. In the section about wireless speeds, Apple states the following: “The new iPad supports fast cellular networks the world over.2 So you can browse the web, stream content or download a movie at blazing-fast speeds. It also works on GSM/UMTS worldwide network technologies including HSPA, HSPA+ and DC-HSDPA — the fastest 3G networks out there. You’ll see downlink speeds up to 42 Mbps with DC-HSDPA and up to 21.1 Mbps with HSPA+.”

    In addition, a minor footnote section explicitly states the limitations of the device in Australia: “4G LTE is supported only on AT&T and Verizon networks in the US; and on Bell, Rogers and Telus networks in Canada. Data plans sold separately. See your carrier for details.” Recent tests have shown that the new iPad is faster in Australia than the previous iPad 2, due to its support for the dual-channel HSDPA standard, which is supported on Telstra’s Next G network.

    In a statement issued tonight, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission said it would tomorrow make an application to the Federal Court in Melbourne against Apple and its Australian subsidiary for alleged contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

    “The ACCC alleges that Apple’s recent promotion of the new “iPad with WiFi + 4G” is misleading because it represents to Australian consumers that the product “iPad with WiFi + 4G” can, with a SIM card, connect to a 4G mobile data network in Australia, when this is not the case,” the regulator said in a statement.

    “The ACCC is seeking urgent interlocutory relief to ensure consumers are made aware of the correct technical capabilities of this device. Additionally the ACCC is seeking final orders including injunctions, pecuniary penalties, corrective advertising and refunds to consumers affected. Consumers who have purchased or are considering purchasing an “iPad with WiFi + 4G” should ensure that they have a proper understanding of the mobile data networks which this iPad can directly access by a SIM card.”

    In my opinion, the ACCC is barking up the wrong tree here. Apple is clearly aware of the 4G situation in Australia and carefully modified its Australian advertisements and pages for the new iPad after the device locally to reflect the fact that 4G speeds are not available locally. I suspect that the ’4G’ label is not prominent enough in the company’s advertising to attract the ire of the Federal Court. In addition, a swathe of articles have made the public very much aware that 4G speeds are not supported. In this, as with a number of things in the past, the ACCC appears to have not quite understood the niceties of Australia’s technology market.

    Image credit: Apple

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. anonymous coward
      Posted 27/03/2012 at 8:35 pm | Permalink |

      I would argue that this federal case is needed, as Apple are purposely misleading those who barely understand all the acronyms and technicalities, and who don’t any of the tech’ blogs at all.
      Since these items are increasingly being adopted by our mums and grandmothers there needs to be extremely clear lines on what claims made.
      As I only luckily caught my mother and grandmother before they went out and bought new iPads to explain that they will not get increased speeds, I may be biased.

    2. Thrawn
      Posted 27/03/2012 at 9:12 pm | Permalink |

      The definition of 4G in itself is tricky. What Telstra calls 3G here is often marketed elsewhere in the world like AT&T HSPA 14.4 etc as 4G anyways (and the iPad/iPhone would actually show 4G logo with HSPA)

      In which case you can argue that the new iPad is connecting to Telstra HSPA as 4G

      • Matthew
        Posted 27/03/2012 at 10:16 pm | Permalink |

        The definition of 4G is not tricky at all. The ITU-R defines 4G as a wireless network capable of peak mobile downstream speeds of greater than 100Mbps, and peak stationary downstream speeds of greater than 1Gbps. Not even LTE meets that criteria, and as such I don’t hesitate to call any marketing that violates the ITU-R definition ‘misleading’.

        I’m an RF engineer for a major telco, and I regularly correct people who try to talk to me about LTE as “4G”, because it bloody well isn’t. I’m sick of marketing idiots bastardising the tech industry in the pursuit of their own selfish agendas.

        • Thrawn
          Posted 28/03/2012 at 1:03 am | Permalink |

          ITU themselves haven’t been entirely consistent on this. On Dec 2010, they said:

          ‘As the most advanced technologies currently defined for global wireless mobile broadband communications, IMT-Advanced is considered as “4G”, although it is recognized that this term, while undefined, may also be applied to the forerunners of these technologies, LTE and WiMax, and to other evolved 3G technologies providing a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed.’

          Essentially ACCC is claiming that one company’s marketing message (Apple) is not ‘compatible’ with another company’s marketing message (Telstra).

          Its a mess… In my opinion ITU has stuffed it up. Terms such as 4G, 3G can not be used to signify compatible standards. Though IMO, it never had anyway

          • Goku Missile Crisis
            Posted 28/03/2012 at 11:18 am | Permalink |

            See, this isn’t really about whose definition of 4G is correct. The fact is that Apple have decided to use the 4G label for its product purely based on its ability to use the American LTE frequencies. There is another technology labelled 4G in the states – Sprint’s WiMAX. Even though the new iPad can’t use WiMAX, it’s still reasonable to call the iPad a 4G device ~in America~.

            So the question is, is it reasonable for Apple to carry this branding over to markets where no network designated as 4G uses those frequencies? And specifically here in Australia, does it violate any of our laws regarding marketing?

            I think there is a case to be made here. Whether it’s worth pursuing is debatable for sure, but I think it could be a nice way to make the point that multinational companies like Apple need to take more care in localising their products, or at least localising their marketing.

        • Angtech
          Posted 28/03/2012 at 9:02 am | Permalink |

          Hi Matthew.

          As an electronics technical officer myself, I totally agree with what’s you said. And stand with you on this issue.

    3. Apple Fanboi
      Posted 27/03/2012 at 10:51 pm | Permalink |

      Well there you go the link for this article is the only thing that needs to be submitted as evidence. Its all so straightforward and one dimensional.

      Case Dismissed

    4. Thrawn
      Posted 28/03/2012 at 2:53 am | Permalink |


      An interesting blog article on the topic

    5. Ian
      Posted 28/03/2012 at 9:26 am | Permalink |

      Funnily enough, we almost certainly will end up with 700MHz LTE in Australia in the “digital dividend” spectrum once analogue TV broadcasting is finally shut down.

      • PeterA
        Posted 28/03/2012 at 1:56 pm | Permalink |

        Except the 700mhz networks deployed in the USA is incompatible with the 700mhz networks deployed and planning to be deployed in Asia. I believe we will be using the system used in asia., not the us.

        So, no calling it 4g won’t even be accurate when we DO start deploying our own 700mhz networks.

    6. tom
      Posted 28/03/2012 at 11:15 am | Permalink |

      Hi Renai,

      > “Apple is clearly aware of the 4G situation in Australia and carefully modified its Australian advertisements and pages for the new iPad after the device locally to reflect the fact that 4G speeds are not available locally. I suspect that the ’4G’ label is not prominent enough in the company’s advertising to attract the ire of the Federal Court.”

      I would like to point out that Apple’s Australian website for the new iPad (http://www.apple.com/au/ipad/) mentions 4G in multiple places.

      From the iPad page: “Designed with next-generation wireless technology, the new iPad with Wi-Fi + 4G connects to fast data networks around the world.”

      From the “features” page (http://www.apple.com/au/ipad/features/): “Learn more about iPad with Wi-Fi and 4G”, which links to:

      “iPad with WiFi + 4G” (http://www.apple.com/au/ipad/4g/): several mentions on this page of iPad supporting 4G.

      “Tech specs” page (http://www.apple.com/au/ipad/specs/) lists the models as “WiFi” and “WiFi + 4G” and also links to the above mentioned 4G page (http://www.apple.com/au/ipad/4g/).

      You have to scroll down to the bottom of the tech specs page to see in tiny font “4G LTE is supported only on AT&T and Verizon networks in the US; and on Bell, Rogers and Telus networks in Canada. See your carrier for details. “, so I don’t really think they are making it clear enough that 4G is not supported in Australia at this time, and they definitely shouldn’t be advertising that iPad model as “WiFi + 4G”.

    7. Apple Fanboi
      Posted 28/03/2012 at 12:44 pm | Permalink |

      “Acting for Apple, barrister Paul Anastassiou … “Apple … is willing to offer a refund to any customer who believed they had been misled by references to 4G, he said”

      Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/apple-offers-refund-rejects-corrective-stickers-over-new-ipad-20120328-1vxlm.html#ixzz1qN6akAiq

      This is outrageous. How dare the ACCC force Apple to offer refunds to people they have ripped off?

    8. Thrawn
      Posted 28/03/2012 at 12:59 pm | Permalink |

      One more thing that hasn’t been brought up.

      Vividwireless in Australia markets its WiMax as 4G. And has been for quite some time, before Telstra brought in 4G LTE. Obviously a Telstra 4G device is not compatible with Vivid and vice-versa.

    9. Phoebe
      Posted 28/03/2012 at 1:58 pm | Permalink |

      “Apple is clearly aware of the 4G situation in Australia and carefully modified its Australian advertisements and pages for the new iPad after the device locally to reflect the fact that 4G speeds are not available locally.”

      Even if they have modified their advertising, it is still confounding the general masses.

      Yes, there are telcos and network engineers who will argue the semantics (and applicability) of calling any network 4G, but apple’s marketing department will use the name that sounds the best rather than the one that is necessarily the most accurate worldwide. At least the ACCC is calling them on that particular tactic.

      End result of this current news frenzy is that I have to try to explain 4G to my dad :\

    10. Kisai
      Posted 28/03/2012 at 3:15 pm | Permalink |

      The problem is that the wireless network operators, not Apple, not the ITU, screwed things up. Starting with AT&T, 4G is supposed to be 100Mbps, not 14.

      The government regulators also screwed things up by auctioning incompatible spectrum, but this is again the American’s fault. Europe does 1800/900 , America does 800/1900, Australia/Asia does 1800/900,

      Where things get sticky is with UMTS and LTE because they can do a type of channel bonding, utilizing multiple radios. So from a cost effectiveness point of view, it only makes sense to sell models that support all the local bands, and international travelers get the bum deal as they may only get one band supported at their destination, and even then, that’s at the whim of the phone manufacturer.

      Right now there are no LTE chips with a power profile good enough to create a “world LTE” phone, even the new chips that come out this year will not have it, and there probably won’t be any until everyone standardizes on 700Mhz and starts tearing down their 2G GSM networks to repurpose their 800/900/1800/1900 bands.

      Just look at T-mobile in the US, and Wind/Mobilicity in Canada, they don’t have iPhones or iPad support because they rolled out their 3G UMTS on AWS spectrum 1700/2100Mhz, when everyone else was rolling out LTE on it.

      I can’t believe how much of a mess “4G” has become where there isn’t a single standard frequency band used anywhere.

      • Antman
        Posted 28/03/2012 at 4:40 pm | Permalink |

        This isn’t a new problem, the radio spectrum has never been carved up consistently.

        Even back in the pre-digital days with R/C equipment you had Australia with cars on 27MHz AM, aircraft on 36MHz FM; United Kingdom/Europe with cars on 27MHz AM and 40MHz FM, aircraft on 35MHz FM and 40MHz AM; United States with cars on 29MHz AM and aircraft on 72MHz FM. Even now that most of the new R/C sets are going to the 2.4GHz band there are still incompatible modulation schemes being used.

        It’s a complete foul-up. You’d think that regulatory bodies would have figured all this out decades ago and coordinate a single set of communications spectrums worldwide, wouldn’t you?

      • Angtech
        Posted 29/03/2012 at 9:11 am | Permalink |

        Comments from kasai. Well done.

        At least someone has done their homework and understands about frequency specrums and county standards. There is also another problem that peple have not mentioned, to my knowledge.

        That is, even with 4g or even 5g speeds available to you it also depends on the distance you from your nearest cell tower is to your phone and if it is a rainy day or not along with the terrain environment you are in. Thanks

    11. NotTheStig
      Posted 28/03/2012 at 4:30 pm | Permalink |

      ACCC will also be suing BMW for advertising cars as being capable of speeds which have never been supported on Australian roads.

      An ACCC spokesman said “This isn’t a populist move designed to get us soft interviews on TV at all. The fact that the companies we target are incredibly popular and successful is completely irrelevant. And raising our profile to help protect ourselves from anticipated budget cuts should there be a change in government never crossed our minds, not for a moment.”

      • PeterA
        Posted 30/03/2012 at 8:57 am | Permalink |

        The cars are capable of the speeds, you just need to take them to a track day.

    12. TallyHo
      Posted 31/03/2012 at 11:33 am | Permalink |

      The ACCC should be charging those Telstra and Ericsson retards for misrepresentation by not building a network that is actually 4G.

    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

  • Most Popular Content

  • Six smart secrets for nurturing customer relationships
    [ad] Today, we are experiencing a world where behind every app, every device, and every connection, is a customer. Your customers will demand you to be where they and managing customer relationship is the key to your business’s growth. The question is where do you start? Click here to download six free whitepapers to help you connect with your customers in a whole new way.
  • Enterprise IT stories

    • NetSuite in whole of business TurboSmart deal turbosmart

      Business-focused software as a service giant NetSuite has unveiled yet another win with a mid-sized Australian company, revealing a deal with automotive performance products manufacturer Turbosmart that has seen the company deploy a comprehensive suite of NetSuite products across its business.

    • WA Health told: Hire a goddamn CIO already doctor

      A state parliamentary committee has told Western Australia’s Department of Health to end four years of acting appointments and hire a permanent CIO, in the wake of news that the lack of such an executive role in the department contributed directly to the fiasco at the state’s new Fiona Stanley Hospital, much of which has revolved around poorly delivered IT systems.

    • Former whole of Qld Govt CIO Grant resigns petergrant

      High-flying IT executive Peter Grant has left his senior position in the Queensland State Government, a year after the state demoted him from the whole of government chief information officer role he had held for the second time.

    • Hills dumped $18m ERP/CRM rollout for Salesforce.com hills

      According to a blog post published by Salesforce.com today, one of Ted Pretty’s first moves upon taking up managing director role at iconic Australian brand Hills in 2012 was to halt an expensive traditional business software project and call Salesforce.com instead.

    • Dropbox opens Sydney office koalabox

      Cloud computing storage player Dropbox has announced it is opening an office in Sydney, as competition in the local enterprise cloud storage market accelerates.

    • Heartbleed, internal outages: CBA’s horror 24 hours commbankatm

      The Commonwealth Bank’s IT division has suffered something of a nightmare 24 hours, with a catastrophic internal IT outage taking down multiple systems and resulting in physical branches being offline, and the bank separately suffering public opprobrium stemming from contradictory statements it made with respect to potential vulnerabilities stemming from the Heartbleed OpenSSL bug.

    • Android in the enterprise: Three Aussie examples from Samsung androidapple

      Forget iOS and Windows. Today we present three decently sized deployments of Android in the Australian market on Samsung’s hardware, which the Korean vendor has dug up from its archives over the past several years for us after a little prompting :)

    • Businesslink cancelled Office 365 rollout cancelled

      Microsoft has been on a bit of a tear recently in Australia with its cloud-based Office 365 platform, signing up major customers such as the Queensland Government, Qantas, V8 Supercars and rental chain Mr Rental. And it’s not hard to see why, with the platform’s hybrid cloud/traditional deployment model giving customers substantial options. However, as iTNews reported last week, it hasn’t been all plain sailing for Redmond in this arena.

    • Qld Govt inks $26.5m deal for Office 365 walker

      The Queensland State Government yesterday announced it had signed a $26.5 million deal with Microsoft which will gain the state access to Microsoft’s Office 365 software and services platform. However, with the deal not covering operating system licences and not being mandatory for departments and agencies, it remains unclear what its impact will be.

    • Hospital IT booking system ‘putting lives at risk’ doctor

      A new IT booking platform at the Austin Hospital and Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre in Melbourne is reportedly placing the welfare of patients with serious conditions at risk.

  • Enterprise IT, News - Apr 17, 2014 16:39 - 0 Comments

    NetSuite in whole of business TurboSmart deal

    More In Enterprise IT

    News, Telecommunications - Apr 17, 2014 11:01 - 92 Comments

    Turnbull lies on NBN to Triple J listeners

    More In Telecommunications

    Featured, Industry, News - Apr 17, 2014 9:28 - 0 Comments

    Campaign Monitor takes US$250m from US VC

    More In Industry

    Digital Rights, News - Apr 17, 2014 12:41 - 7 Comments

    Anti-piracy lobbyist enjoys cozy email chats with AGD Secretary

    More In Digital Rights