• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • News - Written by on Monday, May 2, 2011 17:12 - 6 Comments

    Google Australia claims 2010 financial loss

    The Australian division of search giant Google has filed financial accounts with the nation’s corporate regulator stating it made a loss of $3.08 million in 2010, paying just $7.4 million in taxes as a result, off local revenues of $151.39 million.

    The company’s listed revenues jumped substantially over the 12 months, according to the statement, rising from $110.31 million in 2009, to $151.39 million for the year to December 31, 2010. Google’s biggest local cost was its 434 employees – which soaked up some $111.6 million in the period, meaning their average salary was a whopping $257,000.

    However, the company also spent a great deal on advertising and promotional expenses — $10.53 million in 2010. Other major expenses included travel and entertainment – which was $7.13 million.
    The company’s basic profit and loss statement only listed tax costs of $1.1 million, although the company was actually slated to pay some $7.4 million in taxes in 2010. However it balanced that figure out with deferred tax payments and adjustments.

    At the end of the year, Google Australia was holding some $21.3 million in cash and cash, as well as $34.2 million of what it said were ‘trade and other receivables’. It had some $16.1 million worth of property, plant and equipment.

    However, not everyone believes that Google’s disclosed finances reflect an accurate picture of the company’s local revenues – with industry figures and analysts having stated over the past several years that they believe Google to be making something between $650 million and $1 billion. As Google is not listed on the Australian Stock Exchange, it is not required to go into a great deal of detail about its local finances.

    In the financial statements released last week, Google stated in the revenue recognition section of the documents that it had a number of agreements with other Google subsidiaries which guided how it recognised revenue.

    ”The company has a service agreement with Google Inc for the provision of research and development services, a service agreement with Google Ireland Ltd for the provision of sales and marketing services and a service agreement with Walkway Technologies US LLC for the provision of research and development services,” Google stated.

    In a separate statement, a Google Australia spokesperson said: “Google complies fully with all relevant tax legislation in all the countries in which it operates, including in Australia. That means that we contribute to all relevant local and national taxation schemes – as well as providing employment for over 400 employees in Australia.”

    A spokesperson for the ATO said the agency would not comment on the details of any specific taxpayer. Google’s financial accounts were audited by accounting firm Ernst & Young, and the company lists US-based global finance director Lloyd Martin and general counsel Kent Walker, as well as local director Mark Tucker, as the company’s director contacts. Google Australia lists law firm Baker & McKenzie as its company registered office.

    Image credit: Briony, Creative Commons

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Bob Loblaw
      Posted 03/05/2011 at 8:51 am | Permalink | Reply

      Wow. I mean I know they book their search revenues in Ireland, but this is a pretty remarkable story. A 30% corporate tax rate on a company that makes $1bn in revenue, which most commentators estimate is pretty accurate, is a LOT of lost tax revenue

    2. Paul
      Posted 03/05/2011 at 9:37 am | Permalink | Reply

      Wow – that is a massive average Salary!

      • Posted 03/05/2011 at 10:34 am | Permalink | Reply

        No kidding, I was fairly jealous! :)

      • Posted 03/05/2011 at 10:38 am | Permalink | Reply

        Wouldn’t that be “average cost per employee” rather than “average salary”? That would include at least super + workers comp + other benefits. But yeah, still a nice chunk of left over for salary :)

      • David
        Posted 04/05/2011 at 8:35 am | Permalink | Reply

        Average, eh? That’s a useful statistic. Let’s take the money banks pay out to their employees, including their fat board member and CEO salaries and divide it by all of people they employ – that’s a reasonable estimation what everyone employed by that bank earns, right?

    3. Posted 03/05/2011 at 4:32 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Disclaimer: My comments are not to be considered Tax Office Advice:

      While the Aussie tax regime is not as insane as the US tax code, a smart (and more importantly a LARGE company) can avoid to pay most if not all local taxes.

      Things like tax treaties, overseas tax credits and repatriating profits, as well as local R&D offsets and other tax schemes makes a company willing to spend the money on the tax law ninjas can minimise its tax.

      However, there may be other reasons for a tax loss, and my guess would be that if Google Australia books everything in US$, the rising A$ would hit the company bad. Income of AS$1000 goes from (not real figures) US$1050 to US$950.

    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights