The Australian division of search giant Google has filed financial accounts with the nation’s corporate regulator stating it made a loss of $3.08 million in 2010, paying just $7.4 million in taxes as a result, off local revenues of $151.39 million.

The company’s listed revenues jumped substantially over the 12 months, according to the statement, rising from $110.31 million in 2009, to $151.39 million for the year to December 31, 2010. Google’s biggest local cost was its 434 employees – which soaked up some $111.6 million in the period, meaning their average salary was a whopping $257,000.

However, the company also spent a great deal on advertising and promotional expenses — $10.53 million in 2010. Other major expenses included travel and entertainment – which was $7.13 million.
The company’s basic profit and loss statement only listed tax costs of $1.1 million, although the company was actually slated to pay some $7.4 million in taxes in 2010. However it balanced that figure out with deferred tax payments and adjustments.

At the end of the year, Google Australia was holding some $21.3 million in cash and cash, as well as $34.2 million of what it said were ‘trade and other receivables’. It had some $16.1 million worth of property, plant and equipment.

However, not everyone believes that Google’s disclosed finances reflect an accurate picture of the company’s local revenues – with industry figures and analysts having stated over the past several years that they believe Google to be making something between $650 million and $1 billion. As Google is not listed on the Australian Stock Exchange, it is not required to go into a great deal of detail about its local finances.

In the financial statements released last week, Google stated in the revenue recognition section of the documents that it had a number of agreements with other Google subsidiaries which guided how it recognised revenue.

”The company has a service agreement with Google Inc for the provision of research and development services, a service agreement with Google Ireland Ltd for the provision of sales and marketing services and a service agreement with Walkway Technologies US LLC for the provision of research and development services,” Google stated.

In a separate statement, a Google Australia spokesperson said: “Google complies fully with all relevant tax legislation in all the countries in which it operates, including in Australia. That means that we contribute to all relevant local and national taxation schemes – as well as providing employment for over 400 employees in Australia.”

A spokesperson for the ATO said the agency would not comment on the details of any specific taxpayer. Google’s financial accounts were audited by accounting firm Ernst & Young, and the company lists US-based global finance director Lloyd Martin and general counsel Kent Walker, as well as local director Mark Tucker, as the company’s director contacts. Google Australia lists law firm Baker & McKenzie as its company registered office.

Image credit: Briony, Creative Commons

Tweet

1. Bob Loblaw
   Posted 03/05/2011 at 8:51 am | Permalink | Reply

   Wow. I mean I know they book their search revenues in Ireland, but this is a pretty remarkable story. A 30% corporate tax rate on a company that makes $1bn in revenue, which most commentators estimate is pretty accurate, is a LOT of lost tax revenue

2. Paul
   Posted 03/05/2011 at 9:37 am | Permalink | Reply

   Wow – that is a massive average Salary!

   • Renai LeMay
     Posted 03/05/2011 at 10:34 am | Permalink | Reply

     No kidding, I was fairly jealous! :)

   • Scott Y.
     Posted 03/05/2011 at 10:38 am | Permalink | Reply

     Wouldn’t that be “average cost per employee” rather than “average salary”? That would include at least super + workers comp + other benefits. But yeah, still a nice chunk of left over for salary :)

   • David
     Posted 04/05/2011 at 8:35 am | Permalink | Reply

     Average, eh? That’s a useful statistic. Let’s take the money banks pay out to their employees, including their fat board member and CEO salaries and divide it by all of people they employ – that’s a reasonable estimation what everyone employed by that bank earns, right?

3. Darryl Adams
   Posted 03/05/2011 at 4:32 pm | Permalink | Reply

   Disclaimer: My comments are not to be considered Tax Office Advice:

   While the Aussie tax regime is not as insane as the US tax code, a smart (and more importantly a LARGE company) can avoid to pay most if not all local taxes.

   Things like tax treaties, overseas tax credits and repatriating profits, as well as local R&D offsets and other tax schemes makes a company willing to spend the money on the tax law ninjas can minimise its tax.

   However, there may be other reasons for a tax loss, and my guess would be that if Google Australia books everything in US$, the rising A$ would hit the company bad. Income of AS$1000 goes from (not real figures) US$1050 to US$950.

• • Topic
  • Voices
  • Posts
  • Freshness
• • 77TB a month on fibre

    Started by:  Karl in: General telecommunications

  • 1
  • 1
  • 12 hours, 39 minutes ago

     Karl

  • Malcolm Turnbull, Time Traveller

    Started by:  quink in: Everything else

  • 2
  • 4
  • 1 week ago

     Karl

  • Article on 'Ultraviolet'

    Started by:  ray73864 in: Everything else

  • 2
  • 2
  • 1 week, 3 days ago

     Karl

  • Surface sells out … of its tiny amount of stock?

    Started by:  Renai LeMay in: Gadgets

  • 4
  • 4
  • 1 week, 4 days ago

     douglasrose

  • Coalition fraudband plan summary…

    Started by:  Hubert Cumberdale in: National Broadband Network

  • 4
  • 5
  • 2 weeks, 3 days ago

     JamesH1

  • NBN Is A Question Of Reliability

    Started by:  JamesH1 in: National Broadband Network

  • 1
  • 1
  • 2 weeks, 3 days ago

     JamesH1

  • Renai asked:

    Started by:  Tinman_au in: National Broadband Network

  • 1
  • 1
  • 2 weeks, 3 days ago

     Tinman_au

  • What Happened to Whirlpool posts

    Started by:  MikeK101 in: Everything else

  • 2
  • 2
  • 1 month ago

     Bob.H

  • Conroy/Turnbull NBN Debate Next Week

    Started by:  zephram in: National Broadband Network

  • 1
  • 1
  • 1 month ago

     zephram

  • Blocked from posting? Let me know

    Started by:  Renai LeMay in: Everything else

  • 2
  • 2
  • 1 month ago

     Abel Adamski

  • Falsehoods of the day

    Started by:  Karl in: National Broadband Network

  • 4
  • 5
  • 1 month, 2 weeks ago

     Anonymous

  • Is IBM selling its Network Services Division to Telstra?

    Started by:  Renai LeMay in: Everything else

  • 1
  • 1
  • 1 month, 3 weeks ago

     Renai LeMay

  • 10 Terabit NBN plan? Yes please :)

    Started by:  daniel996 in: National Broadband Network

  • 2
  • 2
  • 1 month, 3 weeks ago

     Karl

  • Renai (or anyone else?): List of working tags?

    Started by:  Tinman_au in: Everything else

  • 3
  • 6
  • 2 months ago

     midspace

  • Receiving spam from "OEMSoftware Newsletter"?

    Started by:  Renai LeMay in: Everything else

  • 4
  • 4
  • 2 months ago

     midspace

•