• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Featured, News - Written by on Sunday, June 6, 2010 23:00 - 6 Comments

    Attorney-General refers Google Wi-Fi issue to AFP

    Federal Attorney-General Robert McLelland has reportedly asked the Australian Federal Police to investigate whether Google breached any laws during its inadvertent collection of Wi-Fi data by it Street View cars while they were taking photographs of locations around the globe.

    In a post on 23 April, the search giant discussed on its Lat Long blog (which is used by the developers of its geographic Earth and Maps services to post updates) the fact that its Street View cars were simultaneously collecting data on Wi-Fi hotspots as they drove around populated countries automatically taking photos.

    Google’s senior vice president of Engineering and Research, Alan Eustance, said the search giant would delete the data and stop collecting Wi-Fi data, period (including in Australia). “The engineering team at Google works hard to earn your trust—and we are acutely aware that we failed badly here,” he wrote.

    However, the potential privacy breach has not been received well, with governments around the globe expressing outrage towards Google over the matter.

    In Australia, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has described the Google breach as possibly “the largest privacy breach in history across Western democracies”.

    Multiple outlets reported this afternoon that at the launch of Cyber Security Awareness Week in Melbourne, Federal Attorney-General Robert McLelland said he had referred the matter to the Australian Federal Police.

    “On Friday the attorney-general’s department did refer those allegations and those reports to the Australian Federal Police. They relayed in substantial part to possible breaches of the telecommunications interceptions act, which prevents people accessing electronic communications other than for authorised purposes,” outlets such as AAP and APC Magazine have reported the politician as stating.

    The AFP has not yet responded to a request for comment on what action it is taking with respect to the situation. “This was a mistake. We are talking to the appropriate authorities to answer any questions they have,” said a Google spokesperson today on the issue.

    The news comes several weeks after the Opposition pressured Conroy in a Senate Estimates Committee hearing to refer the Google Wi-Fi matter to authoritises.

    “Why are you sitting back and watching? Why are you not referring the matter?” Liberal Senator Mary Jo Fisher asked Conroy, who responded that the matter was being handled through the Federal Privacy Commissioner.

    “The Privacy Commissioner is the appropriate place to start this process,” he said.

    Image credit: mrkathika, Creative Commons

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. None
      Posted 07/06/2010 at 12:33 am | Permalink | Reply

      Nice article.

      I look forward to the day that Google is crucified.

      With so many legal actions on foot, and in so many jurisdictions, Google is gonna be a busy little boy :)

      • Posted 07/06/2010 at 9:38 pm | Permalink | Reply

        To be honest I’m not sure I would want to take on Google in a court of law. That company is big enough, ugly enough, has enough money and has enough public opinion on side that I think the governments and privacy people could be in for a fight here.

    2. davek
      Posted 07/06/2010 at 1:31 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Fair enough. Google is being investigated for possible breaches of the law. That’s what the police are supposed to do.

      Have to give Google credit though, for being open about the mistake, and apologising for it. It’s not often that you see a large company admit they stuffed up. Funnily enough, that make me trust Google.

      It sure beats the usual press release in PR speech, saying much, signifying nothing.

      • Posted 07/06/2010 at 9:40 pm | Permalink | Reply

        True — that’s what I like about Google’s actions in this situation. It disclosed early, as much as was probably sensible, and has been open and transparent ever since, to the limits of what it could do without handing its enemies the keys to the kingdom.

        It’s defending itself — but in a way that is definitely not “evil”. Kudos to Google.

        And Google has always been better at talking when it’s important than most companies … although it still keeps a damn lot of secrets. Try asking it, for example, if the Nexus One Android phone is coming to Australia — see how far that gets you ;)

    3. Posted 07/06/2010 at 2:22 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Also, the whole thing is Conroy throwing a hissy fit because Google criticized his filter. Gee, can you think of a government which pushes mandatory Internet censorship despite the protests of its people, then demonizes Google for criticizing this behaviour? Is it the totalitarian Chinese government… or the supposedly democratic government of Australia?

      • Posted 07/06/2010 at 10:22 pm | Permalink | Reply

        *sigh* I think in both cases the similarity is that each government really does not understand that the nature of the internet is that it routes around censorship. Censorship in China, I am sure, will gradually be eroded once the population gets their hands on more powerful encryption techniques that will secure communications. You can’t hold back the tide of change. People want to communicate!

    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights