• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Enterprise IT, Featured, News - Written by on Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:22 - 12 Comments

    Microsoft Hyper-V wins huge Coles rollout

    news Microsoft has revealed that a virtualisation solution built on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 Enterprise with Hyper-V technology has been implemented by retail giant Coles, at each of its 741 supermarkets, to tackle an aging, in-store fleet of server hardware.

    Additionally, the company utilized Microsoft System Center solutions to centrally manage and orchestrate the geographically-dispersed infrastructure. The information was revealed in an extensive case study which Microsoft published on the rollout yesterday.

    Almost a century since it was founded in 1914, Coles has more than 110,000 employees on its payroll, working in the entity’s numerous retail stores, grocery supermarkets, fuel and convenience stores, liquor stores, and several distribution centers. The IT department at Coles manages operations from a central location handling both back-office administrative operations, and more than 12 million customer transactions every week. Field support is provided by technology partners to keep in-store servers and other endpoint devices running efficiently.

    In 2000, according to Microsoft, Coles adopted server virtualisation, choosing VMware, the only viable solution available then. However since VMware was still in its infancy, the company used it in its corporate offices, and implemented the Windows Server 2003 operating system at its supermarket locations with one application server and one point-of-sale server at each store, for a total of 1,500 physical servers.

    The arrangement took its toll on productivity and revenue, and by 2009, it became increasingly difficult for the IT department to ensure seamless running of store operations, in the face of critical server outages because of hardware failure. It thus became imperative for Coles to locate a server virtualisation solution for its stores, especially since it had a successful virtualised server environment in their corporate headquarters.

    Ken Harmsworth, GM Infrastructure Services and Operations at Coles, said in Microsoft’s case study that the critical requirement was to offer ‘quick disaster recovery,’ so that in the event of a failure, stores would be ‘back up and running in a matter of minutes.’ Under these circumstances, Coles decided to deploy Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 Enterprise with Hyper-V technology after evaluating the competition.

    The IT team at Coles can now quickly respond to changing business needs, recover data from servers in seconds, and control costs, without interrupting service to store personnel and customers. Coles worked with Australia–based Dilignet, a member of the Microsoft Partner Network, to design the solution architecture for each Coles’ store.

    Features that have come in handy are Cluster Shared Volumes in the Windows Server 2008 R2 which Coles uses in its failover clusters, and which enables virtual machines to access the same virtual hard disk files; and Dynamic Memory, an enhancement to Hyper-V by which the company can pool memory on a host machine and dynamically distribute it to other virtual machines in the cluster in order to make efficient use of all available physical memory.

    In April 2011, after a successful pilot phase, Coles began rolling out the solution with Hyper-V to individual supermarket locations. By October 2011, the company had implemented the virtualisation solution in 300 stores. Deployment efforts at the remaining supermarket locations are expected to continue throughout 2012. By using Windows Server 2008 R2 with Hyper-V technology, whenever faced with hardware failure, the IT team is able to fix servers without store personnel even noticing (according to Microsoft’s case study), thus using their time to respond to changing business needs.

    Ken Harmsworth, General Manager, Infrastructure Services and Operations at Coles says “By using Hyper-V and System Center solutions, we can easily spin up a new virtual machine on existing hardware from a central location without worrying about devoting costly resources to deploying a physical server.”

    Wow. The virtualisation market has been completely dominated by VMWare for a number of years now, and while the company’s solution is technically excellent — causing a virtual overnight revolution in the way we think about enterprise IT — that dominance has also led to some unfavourable conditions being imposed on VMWare customers from time to time. You know, the sort of terms which monopolists are usually fond of. Compulsorily bundling a web browser with an operating system is a good example ;)

    But now, for Microsoft, the shoe is on the other foot, and the company is now a strong challenger in the virtualisation space. It’s great to see some strong competition in this area and a challenger holding the industry giant to account. As Hyper-V and Microsoft’s complementary server offerings develop further, it will be fascinating to see how the virtualisation market changes. VMWare definitely now has something to worry about — and that can only mean good news for customers :)

    Image credit: Microsoft. Opinion/analysis by Renai LeMay

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Pete
      Posted 15/03/2012 at 11:03 am | Permalink | Reply

      The email wars are now the virtualisation wars. The number of Microsoft sellers (many) vs. VMware will make things interesting.

    2. Clinton
      Posted 15/03/2012 at 12:09 pm | Permalink | Reply

      By using Windows Server 2008 R2 with Hyper-V technology, whenever faced with hardware failure, the IT team is able to fix servers without store personnel even noticing

      Down Down! Hyper-V’s down!!

      • Posted 15/03/2012 at 1:44 pm | Permalink | Reply


        It took me a while to get this one, but it was worth it when I did :)

    3. Zwan
      Posted 15/03/2012 at 2:32 pm | Permalink | Reply

      *hipster voice*

      IBM was virtualising before it was cool.

      • Posted 15/03/2012 at 4:17 pm | Permalink | Reply


        Technically true :) but the definition of virtualization these days might include a bit more than the old platforms were capable of ;)

    4. Posted 15/03/2012 at 5:02 pm | Permalink | Reply

      To me, it seems like this may have had something to do with licensing costs…. Just maybe.

      • Adam Fowler
        Posted 15/03/2012 at 5:14 pm | Permalink | Reply

        When I reviewed the choice between Hyper-V and ESX, Hyper-V was about 1/5th of the cost. ESX was a bit ahead feature/technology wise, but not enough to justify that cost difference. The decision was easy, and Hyper-V has been doing a decent job of things since.

      • Posted 15/03/2012 at 5:17 pm | Permalink | Reply

        I’m sure that came into it :)

        However I also think it could e about levels of complexity. Do you really need the full functionality of VMWare for this business case? Or could this jut be done quicker and easier with something that is already baked in to the underlying platform?

        The NSW Dept of Education deployed a similar ‘branch office server’ rollout of Hyper-V a while back. At the time I got the impression that it wasn’t just about cost etc. It seems kind of like VMWare has its place in the datacentre core, Hyper-V maybe more in the edge server network.

        Requires further investigation.

        • Posted 15/03/2012 at 5:19 pm | Permalink | Reply

          With all due respect, Renai, I don’t think complexity is an issue here. Having administered both in production environments, it’s potatoes and potatoes. If you know one, you prefer it. I don’t think complexity is enough to knock one system over in favour of another.

    5. Posted 16/03/2012 at 10:06 am | Permalink | Reply

      i have to agree with renai, in regards to his comment about complexity. in my experience, having the hyper-v capability ‘baked-in’ to the underlying operating system infrastructure, along with microsoft’s system centre software, makes the business case for hyper-v very compelling.

      whilst everyone would agree that vmware is an outstanding product, with many functions, it still is an ‘extra’ product for a lot of businesses with windows server as their base. if hyper-v can do that job, and in a lot of cases it can (and will only get better), why would you spend more money on a product with functionality that you will never need, and could use a product that integrates seamlessly (now) with your underlying operating system environment.

      i, for one, am glad that hyper-v is kicking some serious business goals in the enterprise space as it will only enhance the rate of adoption for hyper-v, thereby increasing the need for vmware to become more competitive, particularly with price (as previously commented on).

    6. Mark M
      Posted 16/03/2012 at 2:57 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Will get even more interesting when “Server 8″ comes online. Most of the reviews I have seen of it say that has taken Hyper V to the next level. Will be very interesting next few years.


    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights