The National Party of Australia has come out swinging against the Federal Government’s mandatory internet filter policy, with a motion passed at the party’s Federal conference on the weekend against the idea.

The motion stated that “The Federal Conference of the Nationals opposes any mandatory ISP-level internet censorship,” and was passed after a deal of spirited debate, according to people familiar with the situation.

The motion does not bind the Nationals’ parliamentarians to vote against the ISP filtering policy when its supporting legislation is introduced into parliament — particularly as Coalition policy on the matter has not yet been formalised, and the Nationals’ only have 9 Members of Parliament in the House of Representatives and 4 Senators.

However, conference motions do give members of parliament a strong indication as to what their party’s grassroots membership would prefer in matters of policy.

“This has been an issue of major concern to a very large number of people who have contacted the Nationals in recent times,” said a spokesperson for Nationals leader and Minister for Trade Warren Truss this afternoon.

The debate about the issue at the conference was understood to have seen in general some older members of the party squaring off against a number of young guns who were against the filter policy. But there were also a number of older party members arguing against the policy.

The move is just the latest signal of dissent within the Coalition ranks towards Labor’s controversial internet filter policy, which some parliamentarians — such as Greens Communications Spokesperson Scott Ludlam — do not expect to be introduced into parliament until after the next Federal election. A number of Liberal MPs such as Joe Hockey, Jamie Briggs and Alex Hawke have spoken out publicly against the filter.

However, Shadow Communications Minister Tony Smith has repeatedly stated that the Coalition will not reveal its policy on the matter until it sees the detail of the associated legislation.

Image credit: Timo Balk, royalty free

Related posts:

1. Would you vote for a party which supports filtering?
2. Conroy misleads public on Internet filter
3. Sir Humphrey Appleby on the internet filter
4. Hockey slams “unworkable” internet filter
5. Abbott won’t recreate Labor’s “ham-fisted” Internet filter

Tweet

1. Jim Davis
   Posted 21/06/2010 at 10:08 pm | Permalink | Reply

   Smart move good way to get votes away from labour without giving them to the Liberals who are yet to make their stance known officially.

2. Chris
   Posted 21/06/2010 at 10:57 pm | Permalink | Reply

   Any way of knowing who voted in favour/opposition to the motion? My local member is fairly high up in the Nationals and I would like to know where he stood.

   • Renai LeMay
     Posted 21/06/2010 at 11:27 pm | Permalink | Reply

     Sorry Chris — the Nationals didn’t disclose this. I would say the best bet would be to simply ring his office and ask him.

3. Cale Hill
   Posted 22/06/2010 at 3:21 pm | Permalink | Reply

   Just wondering what this article has to do with a picture of two cows…

   • Renai LeMay
     Posted 22/06/2010 at 10:18 pm | Permalink | Reply

     It’s supposed to evoke the Nationals’ predominantly rural constituency ;)

4. Sporting Goods online
   Posted 17/08/2011 at 9:00 am | Permalink | Reply

   This was an awesome article, one of the best that I went through. I added this in my favorite items and will come to your blog to read great posts again! I was searching for a Sporting Goods Onlinewhen I got your blog and find it awesome. If you have information about sports store in Australia please share with me.

5. Anonymous
   Posted 26/08/2011 at 4:17 am | Permalink | Reply

   Awesome blog post! I like it because it shows deep research and analysis on keywords the writer on National Party members vote against internet filter.I read almost 10 articles on this topic but didn’t find an interesting article like this. I also want to share another good sporting goods online store with you for great information.