Delicious/delimiterau
- Qantas tech exec shifts to Jetstar
- Zurich Australia leads regional thin client push
- Early investors drop Facebook
- Victoria kills HealthSMART IT project
- Woz not great - mUmBRELLA
- Santos' thin client starts big-data plans
- Nokia Lumia 800 revs up at Bridgestone
- Telstra privacy breach was 'one little oops'
- 'Battleground of the future' the focus of new agreement with US
- The rise of the vendor management office
News - Written by Renai LeMay on Thursday, February 4, 2010 12:56 - 3 Comments
AFACT appeals to Govt over iiTrial
The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) today said it was disappointed by its losing position in the internet piracy trial against local ISP iiNet, but said it believed the verdict was not what the Federal Government wanted.
Justice Cowdroy today handed iiNet a sound victory in the Australian ISP’s long-running battle against a coalition of film and television studios, finding in the Federal Court that iiNet did not authorise copyright infringement carried out by its customers using the BitTorrent file-sharing platform.
“We are confident that the Government does not intend a policy outcome where rampant copyright infringement is allowed to continue unaddressed and unabated via the iiNet network,” said AFACT executive director Neil Gane in a statement, speaking on behalf of the organisation and the film and TV studios who brought the action.
“Today’s decision is a setback for the 50,000 Australians employed in the film industry. But we believe this decision was based on a technical finding centred on the court’s interpretation of how the infringements occur and the ISP’s ability to control them.”
Gane added AFACT would now take time to review the decision before making further comment on its next steps.
Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has not yet made a statement on the verdict, but he has previous commented on the trial.
For example, in March 2009, the Minister said iiNet’s defence was like something which “belongs in a Yes, Minister episode”, referring to the famously bureaucratic television series.
Related posts:
- AFACT to appeal some iiTrial court costs
- Conroy to examine iiTrial
- AFACT demands Govt action over iiTrial loss
- AFACT will appeal iiNet verdict
- iiTrial: Telstra welcomes “legal clarity”
| Tweet | |
![]() |
3 Comments
Leave a Comment
Enterprise IT, News - May 22, 2012 16:18 - 0 Comments
Govt pushes ahead with cloud-sharing approach
More In Enterprise IT
- The ABC didn’t sack Bitcoin miner
- Victoria dumps HealthSMART e-health project
- HP completes giant new NSW datacentre
- Microsoft beats Salesforce to utility CRM deal
- NSW finalises colossal datacentre consolidation
News, Telecommunications - May 22, 2012 11:15 - 61 Comments
NBN here to stay under Coalition, says analyst
More In Telecommunications
- iiNet ramps up Internode digestion
- China concerned by Huawei NBN ban, says Bob Carr
- Parliament knocks back surveillance terms
- Evidence: Rural Australia is demanding the NBN
- Pristine Telstra network photos: We sourced our own
Gadgets, News - May 21, 2012 12:32 - 5 Comments
Galaxy S III listed for Telstra, Optus and Vodafone
More In Gadgets
- Will Telstra skip Nokia’s Lumia 900?
- New BlackBerry OS 7.1 hits Australia
- ASUS Transformer Pad tablet hits Australia
- HTC One XL on sale: Compatible with Telstra 4G
- Optus a “disgusting” company, says AFL chief
Reviews - May 7, 2012 18:16 - 2 Comments
Telstra Mobile Wi-Fi 4G: Review
More In Reviews
- Samsung Galaxy S III: Preview
- HTC Titan II 4G: Preview
- Nokia Lumia 710: Review
- Sony Xperia S: Review
- Samsung Omnia W: Review








sponsored post ING Direct recently implemented a private cloud solution to virtualise its entire banking platform, allowing it to provision a new copy of itself -- a so-called 'bank in a box' -- within minutes. 
[...] anticipated by the telecommunications sector due to the fact AFACT executive director Neil Gane appeared to appeal to government intervention in the issue of how copyright infringement should be dealt [...]
Fascinated to see that the content industry seems to think that protecting its intellectual property, and its business model, is somehow the purvey of government. Someone really needs to get a grip. Governments ideally don't get involved in legislating to protect corporations.
Ok, ok, I said 'ideally, and I guess a corporation is a real boy, too (ref. recent US ruling)…
[...] do so. Even the question of whether they will appeal the case is still up in the air, after AFACT issued a tersely worded statement following the trial that it would consider its [...]