Tasmanian State Premier David Bartlett has committed to ask the Tasmanian NBN Company whether it would be feasible for Tasmanians to be required to opt-out from having the planned optic fibre cables connected to their premises — reversing the current policy where they are required to opt-in.

“When I next meet with Doug Campbell, the chair of TNBN Co, I am happy to raise it with him and ascertain whether it has been considered,” Bartlett said in a parliamentary estimates committee last week in response to questions on the matter from opposition MP Michael Ferguson.

“I do not think it is the Government’s to consider; effectively it is TNBN Co’s to consider … I think your logic in simplistic terms sounds reasonable but I would not know what various legislative or other regulatory impacts on that logic there might be. It might be that governments do not have the power to just connect anything to any house and if you do not like it you had better have opted out,” Bartlett added.

Ferguson told the committee that he had personally raised the issue with TNBN Co, but he was “not the minister”. He suggested that if the issue were to be resolved, it might assist with the rollout already underway in the state — which has already resulted in some Tasmanians receiving NBN services.

“I am sure there would be plenty of people that would not want the government rolling up onto their property and installing fibre without permission. Nonetheless it would be an enormous cost to the community if we only do get half of our homes connected to the fibre.”

The news comes as debate continues about what proportion of Tasmanian residents are expected to take-up NBN services.

In March Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said the government had not calculated the projected take-up rate, but he did not expect that Tasmanians would ignore the new fibre connections. And in June it was revealed that the Tasmanian Government had estimated 16 percent of homes and businesses would choose to connect.

TNBN Co chair Doug Campbell has pointed to a rate of 28-30 percent achieved in the US by Verizon.

In a separate statement, Ferguson noted that his party was formally proposing that all homes and businesses would be provided with a fibre-optic cable drop.

“By doing a cable drop at the time technicians are already in the area would reduce overall costs to the consumer, make the rollout more efficient and increase take-up rates,” the MP wrote. “The Premier’s last minute backflip where he stated that he would raise the matter with Doug Campbell, chairman of Tasmanian NBN Co Ltd was a welcome relief.”

The Tasmanian estimates committee hearing also dealt with a number of other matters — such as the initial memorandum of understanding in regards to the NBN which was inked by the Tasmanian and Federal Governments and energy utility Aurora — which Bartlett will not release publicly and said had since been largely superceded by other agreements.

Image credit: Delimiter screenshot of Google Maps

Related posts:

1. Oh dear: What colour should Tassie’s NBN cables be?
2. Tassie Liberal leader should take Conroy hard line
3. Conroy opens Tassie NBN ops centre
4. Conroy backs NBN opt-out model
5. The NBN should be opt-out — not opt-in

1. Wolf Cocklin
   Posted 05/07/2010 at 11:20 am | Permalink | Reply

   One possible advantage of the OPT OUT model would be that it will increase the number of rental houses that have access to the NBN.

   Once the roll out begins on the mainland, certainly in the future whether or not a house has NBN access would be a defining rule as to whether or not I would even apply for that property in the future.

   • Renai LeMay
     Posted 05/07/2010 at 12:53 pm | Permalink | Reply

     Is that seriously an issue? I mean I know there are some tighass landlords out there, but I would have thought that anyone who owned a house would be absolutely crazy not to pony up the couple of hundred dollars it will undoubtedly cost to get fibre connected.

     And I’m not sure whether you really have to get permission to get fibre connected to the house if you’re renting it — I mean you don’t have to ask the landlord to get the Telstra copper cable connected now — even if you want more than one line.

2. MLAtkin
   Posted 05/07/2010 at 1:11 pm | Permalink | Reply

   “Is that seriously an issue? I mean I know there are some tighass landlords out there,”

   Understatement of the century. It took my last landlord six months to repair cyclone damage to the roof. If he’d done that sooner he would have avoided the repairs to the kitchen cupboards. Or maybe I’m confusing tightass with clueless :)

   • Renai LeMay
     Posted 05/07/2010 at 1:22 pm | Permalink | Reply

     *sigh* yeah, to be honest you are right. It will take 50 years before landlords really understand fibre — they are generally not young. +1 to the idea of making fibre connections mandatory to avoid the whole nightmare of even calling the real estate agent.

     • MLAtkin
       Posted 05/07/2010 at 2:35 pm | Permalink | Reply

       “It will take 50 years before landlords really understand fibre”

       That fast, eh? They don’t even understand water up here :)

       • Renai LeMay
         Posted 05/07/2010 at 3:01 pm | Permalink | Reply

         True :) We’re currently trying to get ours to put in an elementary piece of equipment so we can operate more than one heater at a time. You wouldn’t believe how difficult it is!

3. Wolf Cocklin
   Posted 05/07/2010 at 7:27 pm | Permalink | Reply

   I have expanded on my idea about the problems for renters over at my blog ( my name is a link)

   As I think this kind of is a bit beyond just what this article was saying :-)

   • Renai LeMay
     Posted 05/07/2010 at 9:14 pm | Permalink | Reply

     Linked to it on Delinker — great post!