Windows InTune trial
Delicious/delimiterau
- Privacy chief probes Google
- Suncorp rules out outsourced IT as customers go online
- Peak provider aspiring to grow iiNet's reach
- Conroy may act following Optus court win
- NSW Businesslink eyes Oracle CRM on-demand
- Q&A;: Department of Human Services CIO, Gary Sterrenberg
- Accenture wins $111m health data warehouse deal
- Photos & review: Qantas’ in-flight iPad entertainment system
- Optus wins TV-recording case
- Optus tops political donations list
News - Written by Renai LeMay on Thursday, March 18, 2010 16:46 - 0 Comments
iiNet wants it all in AFACT case
iiNet has filed a Notice of Contention in the Federal Court in an attempt to win those aspects of its court battle with the Australian Federation in which Justice Cowdroy did not find in the ISP’s favour.
On February 4 Cowdroy handed iiNet a sound victory in the company’s long-running battle against AFACT and the coalition of film and television studios it represents, finding that iiNet did not authorise copyright infringement carried out by its customers.
However, AFACT has since filed an appeal in the case. Today in a statement (PDF), iiNet said its Notice of Contention would seek to reconsider two aspects of Cowdroy’s decision.
Firstly, the ISP wants the full Federal Court to “distinguish” or overturn the 2006 case of Cooper vs Universal Music — which raised the key point about whether an ISP knew copyright breaches were taking place using its facilities.
Secondly, iiNet noted that Cowdroy had found that iiNet was correct in its claim that the Telecommunications Act prohibited the use and disclosure of information the manner AFACT had demanded (namely, customer information), but that he had also found that some exceptions applied, which meant iiNet could use the information in some circumstances.
The ISP wants the full Federal Court to reverse Cowdroy’s exception ruling as it said this would provide an additional basis for finding that iiNet did not have the power to prevent an infringement of copyright and that it would not have been reasonable for iiNet to take steps demanded by AFACT.
iiNet chief Michael Malone said he was confident of the company’s legal position.
“We go into this latest legal round anticipating we come out in an even stronger position than when we won last month,” he said. “Justice Cowdroy’s judgment was unequivocal and we are confident the full court will confirm his ruling and strengthen it.”
Image credit: iiNet
Related posts:
Enterprise IT, News - Feb 2, 2012 18:20 - 0 Comments
Defence hasn’t tested IBM contract since 1999
More In Enterprise IT
- Govt still hasn’t certified Apple iOS devices
- Westpac still running IE6
- Bendigo and Adelaide Bank deploys next-gen IBM storage
- Atlassian sends graduates to beach house
- Improving technology’s grades in Australian education
Analysis, Telecommunications - Feb 3, 2012 13:49 - 63 Comments
Correction: NBN prices will not be higher
More In Telecommunications
- Fletcher wants Oz to learn from UK broadband policy
- Exetel’s John Linton has passed away
- Turnbull wants strong ACCC oversight of NBN Co
- Optus lacks vision and strategy, says Budde
- Correction: Cutting the NBN won’t save money
Analysis, Gadgets - Feb 3, 2012 11:10 - 2 Comments
Who owns footy rights? Optus web copyright victory explained
More In Gadgets
- WA Govt trials iPads in schools
- TV Now: Why the AFL should be grateful
- Telstra launches next-gen
Samsung Windows phone
- Woolworths walks away from Dick Smith
- Nintendo Wii U to hit Australia before Christmas












Leave a Comment