Great articles on other sites
- iiNet founder Michael Malone finally backs TPG Telecom takeover
- How and why the public sector must make friends with artificial intelligence
- Second anniversary of IT pricing report approaches - Computerworld
- Doctors spend 15 mins opening Fiona Stanley Hospital software
- What to expect from Abbott's national cyber security strategy
- ISPs need more time for data retention compliance
- TPG iiNet bid: major shareholders complain
- Qld emergency services payroll replacement on the rocks
- Victoria to wait another eight months for public IT dashboard
- Superloop CEO slams Australian govt tech policies
Renai's other site: Sci-fi + fantasy book news and reviews
- Kim Stanley Robinson’s new book Aurora is due in July
- What’s the future of “Grimdark” fantasy?
- An epic rant from Richard Morgan about nuance in writing
- Brandon Sanderson’s Firefight: Review
- Get into Jeff VanderMeer’s head as he writes the Southern Reach trilogy
- George R. R. Martin’s next book The Winds of Winter won’t arrive in 2015
- Alastair Reynolds’ Poseidon’s Wake launches 16 April
- Ann Leckie’s Ancillary Sword: Review
- Ann Leckie finishes Ancillary Mercy
- Hannu Rajaniemi’s The Fractal Prince: Review
Posts Tagged ‘accc’
News, Policy + Politics - Tuesday, July 28, 2015 13:16 - 3 Comments
news Major telcos Optus and TPG have joined the rest of Australia’s broadband sector and sharply warned Malcolm Turnbull’s Department to stop interfering in the competition regulator’s decision to cut Telstra’s wholesale pricing by 9.6 percent.
In late June, the ACCC made a draft determination on pricing for a certain number of fixed-line telecommunications services, revealing that it had decided Telstra would need to issue a 9.6 percent drop in prices to its wholesale customers. This could mean that broadband providers such as Optus, iiNet and TPG could cut their prices substantially.
However, last week it was revealed that This week it was revealed that Turnbull’s Department of Communications had written to the ACCC arguing that the decision was flawed and could lead to slower migrations to the National Broadband Network. Telstra also published a statement agreeing with the Department.
The Department argued the ACCC should seek “price stability” in the broadband market ahead of the NBN migration process.
However, the Competitive Carrier’s Coalition, representing companies such as Vodafone, iiNet, Macquarie Telecom, Nextgen Networks and Mynetphone, came down heavily on the department’s letter, labelling it as “extraordinary, unwelcome, unwarranted” and setting a “dangerous precedent”.
Last week, Optus and TPG wrote to the ACCC agreeing. The news appears to have first been broken by ZDNet.
Optus Head of Interconnect & Economic Regulation Andrew Sheridan wrote to the ACCC (PDF) stating that his company believed the Department had misunderstood the ACCC’s modelling of Telstra’s costs/ “As indicated in Optus’ submission to the ACCC, the proposed access prices are largely based on Telstra’s data and cost allocation factors,” wrote Sheridan. “… the Department’s concerns about lack of cost recovery by Telstra appear overstated. In addition, it is incorrect to claim that the decision limits Telstra’s ability to recover costs.”
Sheridan said what was “more concerning”, however, was that the Department considered it appropriate to intervene in the way it had.
“This intervention is unlikely to build confidence in the policy settings surrounding the NBN,” the executive wrote. “At the core of the Department’s submission is the request that access prices be kept high now so that consumers don’t face any price changes when they migrate to the NBN. This proposition is inconsistent with consumer interests and the matters that the ACCC has to take into account in setting access prices.”
TPG also criticised the Department for its letter to the competition regulator, noting that it agreed with the ACCC’s rationale for its decisions. The telcos’ letter is available online in PDF format.
“If the draft pricing is confirmed, competitive forces should result in a price reduction for fixed line services for end users. All carriage service providers will seek to use those reduced costs to win as many customers as they can prior to the migration to the NBN. However, the long term interests of end users are of course best served by a cheaper price today, regardless of what the cost of the NBN will be to them,” TPG noted.
“Carriage service providers will not have an incentive to not promote migration to NBN. The migration event is an important one and all carriage service providers are competing heavily to make sure that they get their share of the NBN migrations. Even today, the costs of supplying an NBN service are higher than the costs of supplying a copper based service but this is not stopping all carriage service providers from trying to win customers to their NBN services.”
“The fundamental principle should always be that Telstra is paid a reasonable cost recovery on assets. TPG submits that Telstra has long over-recovered and that it is probably significantly overrecovering from the Definitive Agreements. If the pricing is not reduced, this will result in the continued transfer of wealth from the end users of copper based services to Telstra shareholders. Such a position cannot be reasonably maintained having regard to the principles that the ACCC is obligated to consider.”
What we’re seeing here is a strong rejection by pretty much the entire non-Telstra telecommunications industry of the Government’s intervention into a legitimate process by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, and rightly so.
Even if you agree with the arguments being made by the Government and Telstra on this matter (and I, and it appears, pretty much the entire telco sector, don’t), then it’s extraordinary that the Government would seek to undercut this kind of decision made by the ACCC.
The ACCC has been setting pricing and examining Telstra’s wholesale costs for decades now. It is the only organisation in Australia which is a complete expert in this field, and the only organisation with the teeth to be able to rein in Telstra’s monopolistic powers over the telco sector. This is the very definition of the ACCC’s job, and it should be left to get on with it. You don’t set up an independent arbitrator and then try and stop it from functioning correctly.
Even if you did want to intervene … one would expect a Minister and his Department to do so using back channels rather than formal letters. Letters that are inevitably going to wind up in the media and raise the hackles of the industry.
I can’t understand why Turnbull and his Department felt this was the right way to insert themselves into the ACCC’s process. All they have done is create further acrimony between a Government and a telecommunications sector which they are already at loggerheads with, and for what? The concept of “price stability” and ensuring telecommunications prices don’t fall? That’s not precisely the sort of aim Coalition Governments are known for seeking.
- iiNet shareholders vote ‘yes’ for TPG buyout
- iiNet chairman “proud” as TPG sell-out looms
- “Extraordinary”: Telcos slam Turnbull’s Dept for backing Telstra over consumers
- Turnbull’s Dept says ACCC could delay NBN migrations
- What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?
- The NBN is in a regulatory hole: Time to stop digging
- NBN Co “misleading” FTTN/FTTB users, says ACCC
- Telstra still abusing monopoly powers, warns ACCC
- TPG, iiNet, ACCC support competitive FTTB rollouts
- Monopoly? Melbourne IT buys rival Netregistry
- Foxtel is becoming a content monopolist
- Telstra kicks off P2P throttling trial
- Getting away with blue murder: How the NBN distraction is covering Telstra’s crimes
- Telstra abandons Adam Internet buyout
- HP admits: We deceived consumers
- ACCC knocks back NBN Co contract
- The irony, it burns: Telstra’s NBN price complaints
- Telstra finishes South Brisbane fibre migration
- Surface storage misleading? Choice files complaint
- Never gonna give you up:
ACCC takes TPG to High Court
- Court reversal: TPG ads not misleading
- Adam buy harms ‘fragile’ competition: Macquarie
- Naked DSL subject to water damage: Telstra
- Our NBN debate: Where everyone is partly wrong
- Telstra to buy Adam Internet
- “Misleading consumers”: ACCC sues HP
- Will Telstra will be forced to wholesale 4G?
- Forget naked DSL, says Telstra: Our IT can’t handle it
- Dark day for the ACCC as it abandons competition
- ACCC rubber stamps Optus’ NBN deal
- 4G: Judge finds Apple flouted Australian law
- Apple agrees $2.25m iPad 4G fine
- “Heroic”: Turnbull savages ACCC Optus sign-off
- The ACCC is falling too far in love with the NBN
- ACCC approves Optus’ $800m NBN deal
- Reality check: ISPs do not understand content
- Liberal MP missteps in NBN Co ad rage
- ACCC approves FOXTEL and Austar merger
- Google to launch High Court ad challenge
- Misleading ads: ACCC wins appeal against Google
- In court: Apple offers refunds to iPad buyers
- ACCC sues Apple over “misleading” 4G iPad claim
- Angry iiNet roars dissent at FOXTEL/Austar merger
- Foxtel/Austar merger may unlock IPTV goodies
- ACCC accepts Telstra separation undertaking
- Telstra unhappy with ACCC ADSL regulation
- Turnbull wants strong ACCC oversight of NBN Co
- TPG breaks its silence over Telstra terms
- Status quo remains in Telstra’s South Brisbane
- Optus signs NBN wholesale contract
- Blackmailing NBN Co works best through the media
- NBN policy spurred Internode buyout, says Hackett
- Harvey Norman fined $1.25m for false advertising
- Telstra files revised Structural Separation Undertaking
- iiNet decries “ugly” South Brisbane situation
- CCC demands better ACCC oversight of NBN
- NBN Co releases final telco contract
- Telstra has resolved South Brisbane issue, says ACCC
- TPG buyout to require public inquiry, says iiNet
- NBN Co already acting like a monopoly, says Optus
- TPG creates $69.99 ‘Unlimited’ ADSL plan
- Court finds $29.99 unlimited TPG deal misleading
- Cranky Telstra wants its champagne glass back
- Telstra addresses SSU complaints
- ACCC appeals Google misleading ad case
- NBN Co must own Telstra’s copper, says Hackett
- TPG reveals pricey South Brisbane plans
- Linux fans file ACCC complaint over Win8 boot
- Telstra again threatens to cancel NBN deal
- Google beats ACCC in misleading ad case
- iiNet, Internode double-team Telstra on South Brisbane
- Wireless NBN clause could harm competition: ACCC
- Fix your separation plan, ACCC tells Telstra
- NBN Co acknowledges wireless competition threat
- Markups a wider issue for Aussie industry: Adobe
- NBN Co releases wholesale, ACCC agreements
- ACCC concerned about Foxtel/Austar merger
- Internode prices prove NBN failure, says Turnbull
- Pulling apart the NBN’s untenable pricing model
(by Simon Hackett)
- Telstra ‘price squeeze': Hackett slams ACCC inaction
- Foxtel/Austar merger takes step forward
- Biggest ever? Optus penalty just another “parking fine”
- 20 December 2011: Telstra’s NBN D-Day
- NBN “a joint venture with Telstra”
- The NBN’s 24 hours: The good, the bad & the ugly
- ACCC sets ULL price at $16 flat rate
- Epic Vodafail: 30 page report smashes Vodafone
- ACCC spurs Dell to action on warranties
- ACCC suffers initial setback in TPG case
- TPG ads: Has the ACCC gone too far?
- Internode warns: New PoI model
could consolidate ISP industry
- ACCC sues TPG over $29.99 ‘Unlimited’ plan
- Australia needs a cloud computing regulator
- ACCC mulls regulating Telstra’s DSL
- ACCC calls Optus into the principals’ office
- Panasonic accidentally misled customers with Wii promotion
- $18.5m slug: Telstra fined for exchange caps
- BigPond price cuts anger Internode, iiNet
- Conroy keeps local Telstra calls at 22c
- Rival carriers slam “brazen” Foxtel/Telstra tie-up
- ACCC sues over Optus’ “unlimited” marketing
- Budget 2010: Govt to issue $300m of NBN Bonds
- Optus crows over Telstra legal defeat
- Regulators finger People Telecom, gotalk