Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the Delimiter Forum.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: yes hello

  1. #1
    LK-
    LK- is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4

    yes hello

    Hai, LK- here. I mainly lurk and such. I *may* post from time to time :P
    I'm interested in anything from networking, to system administration(mainly *nix). Now, I just need my gigabit ethernet to extend beyond my router...
    Sup?

  2. #2
    Delimiter Overwatch
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    157
    I just implemented gigabit Ethernet at home courtesy of a new Fritz!Box ... and man, after a decade of 10/100Mbps, it is so sweet

    Question from a former sysadmin myself (Linux/Solaris/FreeBSD plus a bit of SCO Unix): What variant of *nix do you mainly like working with? I used to really enjoy Solaris, but of course Linux is now huge. I wouldn't mind tinkering with FreeBSD more at home.

  3. #3
    LK-
    LK- is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4
    Linux, but that's most likely because most of my experience lays with it. Debian and Arch Linux(depending the circumstances) are my distributions of choice.

  4. #4
    Delimiter Overwatch
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    157
    Interesting. I understand Debian, but curious why Arch Linux? And why not Ubuntu? It seems to have a lot of momentum behind it these days, although of course it's based on Debian itself.

  5. #5
    LK-
    LK- is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4
    I've generally considered Ubuntu to be unnecessarily bloated. Arch Linux is very lightweight, and always up to date. Debian because it's incredibly stable.

  6. #6
    Delimiter Overwatch
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    157
    I take your point about Arch Linux being quite lightweight. I lot of people I know used to use Gentoo because it was a great deal more configurable, and they could easily remove 90% of the crud that pops up in 'heavy' distributions such as Red Hat (or Fedora), Ubuntu and so on. I ran Debian for a number of years, however I never found it necessarily 'stable'. Primarily I found the software either quite dated (in the case of running the 'stable' branch), fairly buggy in the case of running the testing branch, and quite unstable when using the unstable branch, as the name would imply.

    Ubuntu has always seemed to have that great mix of packages where most of the key software you use on a day to day basis is quite up to date and modern, while most of the underlying libraries and so on are a step behind, so they rarely break due to unexpected compatibility issues associated with new software and so on.

    However, each to their own. These days I actually run purely Windows 7 x64 and Mac OS X. So go figure

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    20
    I have FreeBSD 8 on my desktop and once I get a copy of PC-BSD 8, I will put it on my U36 laptop replacing the obligatory Win7 installation. I did have Debian 5 but decided to switch to BSD because I wanted something as close to UNIX as possible. I'm also building up a library of BSD books and pdf information. These are better than using the tedious manual pages.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •