Survey shows legacy tech blocking digital transformation

4

news A new study from networking solutions provider Brocade has suggested that legacy technology is holding businesses back from the full advantages of digital transformation.

The report, titled Unlocking the Power of Digital Transformation: Freeing IT from Legacy Constraints, suggests that businesses are missing out on opportunities to “unlock innovation more quickly and more effectively due to legacy technology and historical misperceptions about the role of IT departments”, Brocade said.

Conducted by independent research house Vanson Bourne in April 2016, the study looked at the current situation and perceptions of IT departments in UK, US, Germany, Singapore, France and Australia.

The survey polled 630 decision makers in organisations with more than 500 employees.

According to the report, 79% of Australian IT teams responded that greater opportunity to take a flexible approach to technology would result in a number of benefits, including the elimination of ‘shadow IT’ (35%), increased competitiveness (34%) and more time to focus on innovation (24%).

Respondents also projected that a greater ability to innovate could bring a 12% increase in revenue and a 10% decrease in costs over the next 12 months, on average.

The responses revealed that daily IT tasks in Australia – for example maintaining data security and privacy, and legacy systems – are so time consuming that opportunities to innovate and transform are being missed in some businesses. Indeed, 75% and 70% of respondents cited these factors as taking up the most time, respectively.

Further, 66% of Australian respondents said they felt frustrated when their department was not readily able to deliver on demands from their companies.

“For the last two decades, legacy IT infrastructure held back businesses from innovating on their terms,” said Gary Denman, Brocade’s Managing Director for ANZ. “The IT department has found itself having to say ‘no’ to new business opportunities too often.”

Denman further suggested new network technologies are the “critical key” to making the most of digital transformation and freeing the IT department from legacy constraints.

While digital transformation is already big priority, Brocade said, IT professionals are faced with making “trade-offs” affecting their ability to adopt new technologies and approaches.

The firm’s research revealed that 90% of Australian respondents are currently adopting digital transformation strategies, with 100% indicating their CIO views this as vital to achieving business objectives. However, said Brocade, 93% said they are restricted in their ability to adequately support digital transformation.

The restricting factors were cited as lack of budget (46%), security concerns (40%), the inflexibility of current systems (26%), and the time spent maintaining legacy systems (14%).

Additionally, 34% of Australian respondents said that the limits of legacy technology are preventing their IT department from delivering on even immediate business demands.

“We know from experience, and our report confirms, how critical IT is to enabling innovation, but too many businesses are restricted in their ability to adopt digital transformation and drive this change,” said Denman.

“It’s clear that if IT departments could spend less time ‘keeping the lights on’, then they could devote more time to creating value, reducing costs and increasing revenues. Organisations need to be more fluid with their uptake and deployment of technology,” he concluded.

4 COMMENTS

  1. The biggest problem is a combined cultural and financial one.

    The costs of maintaining legacy systems in a state that allows innovation and connectivity falls on the new project or solution, rather than on the legacy system themselves. This in turn is due to business decisions driven where financial trumps technical in ensuring that applications, systems and platforms are maintained at or near current release. The cost associated with upgrades was a stopper, but the costs incurred by a business by not maintaining their applications, systems and platforms never registers directly on the bottom line of the finance team’s spreadsheets.

    Changing this culture to one where a cost assumed in taking on any new infrastructure includes maintaining it at current release (or near enough) or ensuring that adequate continued investment occurs in bespoke solutions, to reduce the marginal costs elsewhere for innovation. It makes solutions look worse to the bottom line, but it increases the options for change and for better accounting of costs across the technology stack of a business.

  2. Funny! I knew this before 2002. Fled to the United States with tens of thousands of other professionals

  3. You read about all those big ICT project announcements. You see the jobs advertised. But what you don’t see is that the job applicants never get a response from the recruiter or an interview because the projects never get the “green light”. The jobs adverts are false and are not genuine!

    I am afraid Australia is stuck with the lack of ICT workforce because of narrow future vision. There has been a lack of genuine IT development. It has offloaded and sold out long term professionals and flooded the market with cheap inexperienced 457s leaving themselves with no intellectual capital. But they are cheap and the accountants are happy.

    The development window of next generation of high speed gigabit broadband applications has already passed. Once again the Technology Innovation Ship sails right past Australia.

    Lateral thinking at it’s best.

    Even this 15 year old high school dropout knows there is nothing for him in Australia and goes to New York City with his mum to seek his fortune
    http://nypost.com/2016/04/14/this-16-year-old-millionaire-is-living-your-dream-life/

Comments are closed.