news Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull appears to have called in National Broadband Network contractor Fulton Hogan to assist with a political photo opportunity associated with the by-election campaign in the Canning electorate in South-East Perth and Mandurah.
The seat of Canning has been held since 2001 by long-standing Liberal MP Don Randall. However, Randall unfortunately passed away in an untimely manner in mid-July, leaving the seat open. A by-election has been called for 19 September.
Minister Turnbull is currently on a campaigning trip in Mandurah associated with the by-election campaign. The Minister has made a number of posts on Twitter over the past several days detailing his plans to support Canning Liberal candidate Andrew Hastie.
On Sunday night, for instance, the Minister held a forum with Hastie at Byford Tavern, and this morning the pair caught a train together from Esplanade Station in Perth to head south to Mandurah, where Minister Turnbull attended a forum at the Pinjarra Recreation Club to discuss “telecom, broadband issues”.
None of these activities would be regarded as unusual in the context of an election campaign — senior political figures often jet in for several days to help out a local candidate.
However, it also appears as though Minister Turnbull has roped in a key local NBN contractor to assist with the campaign.
Parts of Mandurah are fortunate enough to have been included in the early stage rollout of the National Broadband Network, with the NBN company’s coverage map showing that a Fibre to the Premises rollout covers much of the district close to the coast. Other sections to the north, east and south of that coverage area are currently being built-out.
One of the main contractors working on the NBN in Western Australia is Fulton Hogan. The company had initially held a contract to build NBN infrastructure in South Australia. However, several months ago the NBN company named Fulton Hogan as one of its new batch of construction firms.
In a separate media release, Fulton Hogan said it had won a contract to deploy local and distribution fibre network inrastructure in four locations across the Perth metropolitan area.
In a post on Twitter this morning, Minister Turnbull noted that he was “With the team from Fulton Hogan rolling out the NBN in Mandurah”. He included the #AndrewHastie hashtag on his post.
It is not currently clear as to what extent the NBN contractor’s apparent role supporting the Liberal election campaign for Canning would be regarded as inappropriate.
During the 2013 Election Campaign, the NBN company issued a statement noting that, as a fully publicly-owned government business enterprise, it would be taking on most aspects of the Caretaker Conventions which guide the behaviour of the public service during the pre-election campaigning period.
The Caretaker Conventions (available online in full) do not apply during a by-election campaign, and it is not clear to what extent they would affect the behaviour of non-government organisations such as Fulton Hogan.
However, the Caretaker Conventions do contain provisions that would affect the NBN company itself in the kind of event Minister Turnbull held this morning. For example, they state that officials should not agency resources or their positions to support particular issues or parties during an election campaign. In addition, the Conventions would set fairly strict limitations on invitations to speak on controversial issues.
Neither Matt Keogh, the Labor candidate, nor Vanessa Rauland, the Greens candidate, appear to have publucly raised the issue of the NBN in the Canning campaign.
Delimiter has contacted the office of Minister Turnbull to invite comment on the appropriateness of NBN contractors being involved in the Canning by-election. Delimiter has also invited the Minister to comment on whether other candidates were invited to attend the NBN event with Andrew Hastie.
The NBN company has a history of involvement in activity during previous election campaigns which have led to questions regarding its impartiality. For example, the company held a substantial number of launch events during the 2013 campaign. The company invited both Government and Opposition spokespeople to the events, but they were typically held to detail new local Fibre to the Premises infrastructure, which was a feature of the Labor NBN policy but not the Coalition’s rival policy.
In addition, during the 2010 Election Campaign, former NBN chief executive Mike Quigley strongly attacked the Coalition’s broadband policy just days before the Federal Election.
With the team from Fulton Hogan rolling out the NBN in Mandurah #AndrewHastie pic.twitter.com/gzScY1ofQv
— Malcolm Turnbull (@TurnbullMalcolm) August 31, 2015
opinion/analysis
I don’t believe the Caretaker Conventions apply to by-elections, and I don’t believe a huge amount of resources have been diverted here from the NBN company to help Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull. Fulton Hogan’s involvement in the Canning by-election isn’t a huge, earth-shaking deal.
However, it does raise questions. Minister Turnbull went to Canning this week for the express purpose of campaigning with local Liberal candidate Andrew Hastie. And he did so at a site where the NBN company is deploying infrastructure, taking a campaign photo involving NBN contractor staff and Hastie. Will we see continued repeats of this kind of behaviour during the 2016 Federal Election campaign? We certainly did under Labor during the 2013 Election Campaign.
One wonders just how far the NBN company will hold itself back in 2016. It would have been relatively simple, one assumes, for the company to have kept its contractor staff out of any involvement in the Canning by-election.
Image credit: Office of Malcolm Turnbull
The question that hasn’t been answered is were Fulton Hogan acting independently from NBNCo or not? Were Fulton Hogan at the event at the invitation of Malcolm Turnbull, Liberal Party MP or at the direction of NBNCo? The absence of an NBNCo representative could suggest the former.
It may be within the rules. But I don’t think it passes the ‘sniff test’.
Whilst we may think this particular instance doesn’t add up to much we need clearer rules.
But Fulton Hogan is a private contractor Which is not part of public NBN. No issue here.
Labor has had its advantage in 2010 election which was much more obvious of bias where the head of NBN was openly sided with Labor.
“Labor has had its advantage in 2010 election”
Well, you said ‘advantage’. There shouldn’t be use of Government owned bodies or their contractors available to offer electoral ‘advantage’. Just because its been done before doesn’t make it better.
Australia needs cleaner politics and part of that will come through clearer rules.
Did anyone raise the need for “clearer rules” in 2010 election when Labor was abusing its advantage? I doubt it.
And your point is what?
We can always progress and make things better. The alternative is to give up and die.
@Natasha the difference is labor was showing their policy in action, ie building the NBN, Turnbull is trying to take credit for FTTP build that isn’t his and is politicising contractors which afaik has not been done before.
+1 Thank you very much for hitting the nail on the head.
And the head of NBN 2015 sides with the Coalition… Err because like Quigley, he is employed to do what the government ask him to do.
I would have thought that bleedin’ obvious.
*shrugs*
Perhaps the reason that Turnbull was careful enough to include the contractor is that it suddenly opens up the travel budget for doing his job as Minister rather than travel for electoral purposes, which should not be claimed.
Doubt it. I’d credit Turnbull with a lot more than that.
Frankly, he is hardly pushing the envelope on election in-propriety here. There are worse examples, and I don’t think anyone is saying he broke rules.
Renai is definitely implying he broke the rules.
This is a no story story, and easy to do. The purpose of this article is to incite an emotional responses from the “universal FTTP” crowd, generating page views. In other words it is clickbait.
From the article:
You definition of “imply” must be different to the rest of us…
Right, so what is the purpose and point of this story?
Here’s the general summary – “somebody might have done something, which I’ll make sound controversial, but I don’t know if they did, yet even if they did, I don’t think there is a problem with them doing so.”
If there is no point, then it is just a waste of Renai’s time writing it and the readers time reading it.
But it isn’t a waste of Renai’s time, because he gets advertisement revenue from people reading what is *implied* to be a controversial and *implied* to be possibly against the rules.
Renai should have more respect for his readers time than writing articles that actually have no substance.
Just do what I do Mr Shark, skip the stories that don’t interest you (and I do skip a few). You shouldn’t feel like you have to read and/or comment on every one…it’s like the business pages in the paper, not everyone will find the share price of company xyz interesting, but there will be some that find it fascinating.
And yet all Renai seems to have done is amused the FTTP crowd (yes we again shake our heads and laugh at the daily incompetence of the MTM project)…
Whilst obviously inciting sheer rage from the rusted on, cyclopic conservatives, crying foul yet again as they refuse to accept the complete fuck up which is MTM NBN and ergo, blame Renai and the rest of us here, for simply stating the bleedin’ obvious.
Just another example of how the government can manipulate to suit. Cashed-up and manpower (15 flown in from the east). Meanwhile, mainstream media fawn over the two parties. No wonder people can’t decide. They think they have only two choices, when there are 12 candidates.
“You’ll get it sometime. maybe in the next century”. Giving people FTTN should be an automatic dismissal.
they should also realise the Liberals are the reason why people are stuck on dialup technology or on expensive scammy mobile trying to avoid faulty dialup technology.
I’m sure the LNP would welcome anyone to campaign with/for them. Except for Tony of course…
Turnbull needs all the help he can get to sell that sack of shit.
+1
I like how there are storm clouds lingering in the background in the picture!
I’m confused. Would Malcolm be raving about all the FTTP that is going in to the part of Mandurah that falls in the electorate of Brand as per the Labor plan or is he going to tell us suckers in the Canning side of Mandurah that he has stopped the original FTTP roll out, that should have covered all of Mandurah North to South,just in time to ensure that all of the Canning side of Mandurah bar a small exclusive section of the canals gets FTTN………
Comments are closed.