• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites


  • Renai's other site: Sci-fi + fantasy book news and reviews
  • RSS Renai LeMay

  • Blog, Industry - Written by on Monday, April 28, 2014 13:57 - 11 Comments

    Uber’s ride-sharing: Just the tip of the iceberg for Australia’s emerging ‘sharing economy’

    supporthands

    blog Those of you who keep a close eye on vehicle sharing developments around the world will recall that on-demand ride service company Uber, which has traditionally worked with taxi and private car hire companies to make it easier for passengers to book a car, deployed a new aspect to its service internationally in April 2013. Dubbed ‘ride-sharing’, the service allows anyone with a car to offer lifts to anyone else, for a price. The service competes directly with rivals such as Lyft and SideCar, which have launched in the US but which have not yet achieved any traction in Australia.

    Up until now the service hasn’t caught much attention in Australia, although Uber and rivals such as GoCatch and Ingogo have been steadily growing in Sydney, in coopetition with existing taxi and private car hire companies. However, late last week the issue came to the fore as Victorian Transport Minister Terry Mulder said the state’s Taxi Services Commission, chaired by former ACCC chair Graeme Samuel, was investigating Uber’s ride-sharing service. The Sydney Morning Herald reports (we recommend you click here for the full article):

    “On the face of it, Mr Samuel believed that Uber was not complying with the Victorian public transport legislation. “If they are not complying with the law we’ll prosecute,” he said.”

    The obvious impetus for most of the angst is the amount of revenue being pulled in by taxi organisations and taxi drivers all around Australia, who have predominantly seen the uptake of services such as Uber, GoCatch and Ingogo as a positive up until now, due to the fact that they boost taxi utilisation rates and hence individual drivers’ revenues. The new ride-sharing service, on the other hand, has the potential to pass revenue off to private car owners.

    Such services threaten taxi revenues; and predictably the Australian taxi organisations are in an uproar already. State Governments also make a lot of money from regulating the taxi industry, especially selling lucrative taxi plates, meaning they too have quite a bit to lose if taxi utilisation rates sink.

    However, there’s also quite a lot of indication that ride-sharing is ultimately to the benefit of consumers due to lower costs and increased freedom of choice, and that the dangers of consumers using unregulated individual car ride-sharing services may be exaggerated. US technology magazine Wired published an excellent yarn last week on the wider issue in general. The magazine reported (we recommend you click here for the full article):

    “The sharing economy has come on so quickly and powerfully that regulators and economists are still grappling to understand its impact. But one consequence is already clear: Many of these companies have us engaging in behaviors that would have seemed unthinkably foolhardy as recently as five years ago. We are hopping into strangers’ cars (Lyft, Sidecar, Uber), welcoming them into our spare rooms (Airbnb), dropping our dogs off at their houses (DogVacay, Rover), and eating food in their dining rooms (Feastly). We are letting them rent our cars (RelayRides, Getaround), our boats (Boatbound), our houses (HomeAway), and our power tools (Zilok). We are entrusting complete strangers with our most valuable possessions, our personal experiences—and our very lives. In the process, we are entering a new era of Internet-enabled intimacy.

    This is not just an economic breakthrough. It is a cultural one, enabled by a sophisticated series of mechanisms, algorithms, and finely calibrated systems of rewards and punishments. It’s a radical next step for the ­person-to-person marketplace pioneered by eBay: a set of digi­tal tools that enable and encourage us to trust our fellow human beings.”

    What the Wired article makes clear is that the Uber ride-sharing service is just the tip of the iceberg. The United States is going through a remarkable wave of capitalist change at the moment, driven by the encroachment of the ‘sharing economy’ on traditionally regulated market structures. I would suggest to Ministers such as Terry Mulder and regulators such as Graeme Samuel that they need to look at this phenomenon in greater depth before passing judgement on this specific aspect of it.

    Other Ministers, such as NSW Transport Minister Gladys Berejiklian, appear to be a little more on top of the situation and its long-term potential, and some commentators are also already on board, pointing out that the taxi industry has had a stranglehold on its sector for far too long.

    It will be interesting to see how things develop as more and more ‘sharing economy’ services hit Australia over the next several years. I suspect such platforms will be quickly taken up by consumers and will provide valuable niche alternatives to large corporate services, while regulators will struggle for at least the next decade trying to work out how or whether they should be controlled.

    Print Friendly

    11 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. HazchemD
      Posted 28/04/2014 at 2:10 pm | Permalink |

      Uber isn’t ride sharing. It’s a taxi alternative service. It’s IMO a success not only because it’s cheaper but because it’s better than existing taxi services. Give me a choice between Uber and taxi at the same price and I’ll go Uber every time

      Used airbnb for the first time last holiday, awesome as well

      • Posted 28/04/2014 at 2:15 pm | Permalink |

        Read the article … Uber has also launched a ride-sharing service.

        • HazchemD
          Posted 28/04/2014 at 2:29 pm | Permalink |

          yeah but uberX (or uberPOP in Aust) is still just and ad Hoc taxi service. You tell the driver where you want to go and they get paid to take you there. Hardly ride sharing. And it’s actually my favourite part of uber!

          • Andy
            Posted 28/04/2014 at 8:54 pm | Permalink |

            Unlike a real taxi, they’ll actually take you, too!

            Melbourne taxis aren’t interested unless you’re going to/from the airport or somewhere equally far (read: expensive) on a weekend…

            • JC
              Posted 29/04/2014 at 11:49 am | Permalink |

              … but not too far. I’ve been refused a taxi ride home from the melbourne CBD because it was too far to Mt Dandenong, and similarly been refused because it’s too short to go to Kew. I’ve since learned to not reveal my destination till I’m in the car when they can’t legally tell you to get out because they don’t want to drive you, and at which point you can get their details to report them.

              • Dan
                Posted 29/04/2014 at 7:43 pm | Permalink |

                They can’t legally refuse you at all unless you are drunk or violent.

    2. Rob
      Posted 29/04/2014 at 11:05 am | Permalink |

      Competition is good, there should be a level playing field though. UberX is basically a taxi service, either they are subject to the same regulations that the taxi industry is or the taxi industry should be subject to less regulations.

    3. ex-gov
      Posted 29/04/2014 at 11:34 am | Permalink |

      Interesting wsj blog article on the same subject:

      http://blogs.wsj.com/accelerators/2014/04/23/jeremiah-owyang-the-collaborative-economy-will-double-this-year/

    4. Steve Hodgkinson
      Posted 29/04/2014 at 1:02 pm | Permalink |

      Good article Renai – these co-production systems are very interesting as an alternative to the traditional structures where trust requires heavy duty corporations and government regulation (trust the yellow coloured taxi because you know the government is regulating the taxi industry etc.) Instead this top down trust model is replaced by a bottom up peer-to-peer model which can actually be better because it is based on a much finer grained series of real time feedback loops.

      Both models have their flaws but the one thing that is clear is that the peer-to-peer model enabled by the Internet and social media is evolving at a much faster pace than traditional regulated models are capable of evolving.

      The peer-to-peer model, however, requires (and encourages) intelligent engaged consumers … whereas the regulated model encourages consumers to rely on the ‘Nanny State’ to protect them while they go blithely about their day. One good outcome of peer-to-peer model like eBay is that customers are required to actually positively engage in the safety of their transaction rather than simply rely on some form of institutional safety net. eBay, like Uber, however, is not for everyone. Caveat emptor.

    5. Fedora nek
      Posted 01/05/2014 at 10:03 am | Permalink |

      Just putting this out, there’s a sharing economy search engine that is killing it in Europe called Outpost: http://outposttravel.com

      -Fedora NB, TipLe

    6. David Dolphin
      Posted 02/05/2014 at 10:04 am | Permalink |

      It would be interesting to get some clarity on the following:

      1. What are the rego and insurance implications when using your own car to run a business?
      2. What are the income tax implications for you as a driver?
      3. What are the tax implications for Uber itself when taking 20% of your earnings?
      4. Since Uber sets the rate for the trip, can you refuse it if it is too small an amount?
      5. Once the other competitors come on board, will price wars happen (as in San Francisco)?
      6. Once it catches on, will it end up being overrun by cowboys and hacked by mischief makers?
      7. Exactly how does Uber get Police checks on drivers? Can I get a Police check on somebody?
      7. Isn’t 20% rather a high commission rate for Uber since the driver is already giving “cheap” rides, paying for petrol, car maintenance and tolls?

      Personally I see this as being attractive for passengers while fares are cheaper but not sure how the drivers will really get much economic benefit.
      The problem is, you only hear from passengers who are happy to save money and those running the system who are making easy money.
      It seems to me there is a risk the drivers may end up as unhappy as Taxi Drivers and Pizza Delivery people, doing a lot of work but not making much money.




  • Get our weekly newsletter

    All our stories, just one email a week.

    Email address:


    Follow us on social media






    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Govt blows $14.4m on Windows XP, Server 2003 support nadella-1

      The Federal Government has paid Microsoft more than $14.4 million for custom support of the outdated Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 operating systems, in a costly move which further demonstrates the extreme cost of running operating systems which are no longer formally supported by their vendors.

    • [ad] Tatts Group optimises business performance with StruxureWare software schneider

      Tatts Group is one of Australia’s largest lottery and gaming companies, operating the majority of lotteries within Australia, as well as wagering, telephone betting and online transactions. Their online transactions make them one of the highest trafficked sites in the country.

    • Legacy health software lands SA Govt in court doctor

      In which the South Australian Government comes up with complex legal arguments as to why it should be able to continue to use a 1980’s software package.

    • Microsoft wants to win you back with Windows 10 windows-10

      The latest version of Microsoft’s Windows operating system will begin rolling out from Wednesday (July 29). And remarkably, Windows 10 will be offered as a free upgrade to those users who already have Windows 7 and 8.1 installed.

    • Qld Govt Depts have no disaster recovery plan brisvegas2

      Two sizable Queensland Government departments have no central disaster recovery plan, the state’s Auditor-General has found, despite the region’s ongoing struggles with extreme weather conditions that have previously knocked out telecommunications and data centre infrastructure.

    • ASD releases Windows 8 hardening guide windows-8-1

      The Australian Signals Directorate appears to have released a guide to hardening Microsoft’s Windows 8 operating system, three years after the software was released for use by corporate customers, and as Microsoft is slated to release its next upgrade, Windows 10.

    • ASG picks up $35m CIMIC IT services deal money

      Perth-headquartered IT services group ASG this week revealed it had picked up a deal worth at least $35 million over five years with CIMIC Group — the massive construction and contracting group previously known as Leighton Holdings.

  • News, Policy + Politics - Aug 4, 2015 16:12 - 18 Comments

    Turnbull revises history on NBN satellite demand

    More In Policy + Politics


    Enterprise IT, News - Aug 3, 2015 16:03 - 5 Comments

    Govt blows $14.4m on Windows XP, Server 2003 support

    More In Enterprise IT


    Industry, News - Aug 4, 2015 16:52 - 1 Comment

    Posse group picks up $5m in funding

    More In Industry


    Consumer Tech, News - Jul 29, 2015 17:14 - 11 Comments

    Telstra integrates Netflix, Stan, Presto into re-badged Roku box

    More In Consumer Tech