• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Analysis, Gadgets - Written by on Wednesday, October 2, 2013 16:16 - 13 Comments

    Good news, flyers: ‘Flight mode’ is safe during take-off and landing


    This article is by Hamza Bendemra, Doctoral Candidate, Engineering at Australian National University. It originally appeared on The Conversation.

    analysis Earlier this year, the US Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) put together a panel of aviation experts to look at whether personal electronic devices (PEDs) could be used on planes without compromising safety.

    The results are in: the committee is recommending that electronic devices – such as tablets, e-readers and other PEDs – be allowed during all phases of flight (including take-off and landing).

    The FAA asked the Advisory and Rulemaking Committee to investigate this particular issue after growing public scepticism about limitations, and increased public pressure to allow passengers to use their electronic devices during all phases of flight. When applicable, passengers will have to switch their devices to airplane/flight mode. Passengers will hence be allowed to listen to music, watch a movie, play games or read an e-book on their e-reader or tablet – as long as the data was downloaded and saved on the device before take-off.

    As the committee’s report points out, many new generation aircraft have the appropriate shielding to prevent any interference from PEDs that may be on board.

    The FAA is widely expected to follow through with the committee’s recommendations and will likely begin implementation next year. Other regulatory agencies, such as Australia’s Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), are expected to follow FAA’s lead on the issue.

    The committee is maintaining restrictions on devices capable of connecting to a mobile phone network and/or with data communication capability. Hence, mobile phones are not expected to be allowed to be used during take-offs and landings any time soon. They will be required to be put on “flight mode”.

    A mobile phone searching for a network tower emits much higher energy radio waves and is therefore more likely to cause electromagnetic interference (EMI). Another concern is that a plane flying with several hundreds of phones attempting to connect to a nearby tower would cause unnecessary strain on the mobile phone network.

    However, some airlines are already offering products that allows their passengers to make phone calls on their flight. Emirates has been pushing for this technology for several years. It relies on pio-cell technology which is basically an on-board antenna which relays calls to towers on the ground. The system is controlled by the flight crew.

    Pressure on the FAA sharply increased over the past few years as electronic device use skyrocketed and airline passengers became increasingly dependent on them. As Brazilian illustrator Felipe Luchi so perfectly illustrated in his artwork, we are becoming increasingly dependent on our mobile devices.

    The decision to allow the use of electronic devices on planes may seem self-evident to some, but the committee was rigorous. The committee was set to release its recommendation months ago but asked for an extension as there was a large amount of data to review and evaluate. Public perception that a small device like a mobile phone could not possibly interfere with a plane’s electronics is at the core of the issue – as shown by the parody below.

    A recently conducted survey showed that 30% of passengers admitted to not turning off their mobile phone when flying – but how many of them are actual aviation safety experts? Does knowing how to use an iPhone give someone the expertise to assess whether it can take interfere with a plane’s electronics?

    Evidence-based policy is – as the term suggests – based on evidence. As is usually the case with research, it is extremely difficult to come up with a black-and-white answer. Research outcomes are made up of shades of grey: assessing likelihood, risk and so on.

    As pointed out in a previous piece for The Conversation, interference allegedly due to phone calls during flight has been reported – but the lift of the ban on electronic devices such as e-readers and tablets is certainly most welcome.

    Hamza Bendemra does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations. This article was originally published at The Conversation. Read the original article. Image credit: Qantas

    The Conversation

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Posted 02/10/2013 at 5:01 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Flight Officials: “Devices safe when in flight mode”
      Everyone Else: “Duh…”

    2. Oliver Townshend
      Posted 02/10/2013 at 5:49 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Oh god, let’s put everyone else in charge of safety. The crowd knows best.

    3. Posted 02/10/2013 at 7:07 pm | Permalink | Reply

      There’s a big difference between technically safe to use and optimal for use when considering that the Cajun crew need to be in positions of authority should an incident occur.

      • PeterA
        Posted 03/10/2013 at 7:34 am | Permalink | Reply

        So why make people undermine (secretly) their authority over a rule that doesn’t matter.

        IE “screw these guys; I’m going to leave my phone on during takeoff!”. Instead of making the cabin crew enforce ludicrous rules like “you must turn off all electronic devices, even your kindle, except you know your watch, thats fine, and your iPad you left on in your carry-on over your head.”

        We should make the cabin crew enforce real rules; like stow your bags in the overhead and not the aisle, you know, things that affect everyone’s safety.

    4. dave
      Posted 02/10/2013 at 7:38 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Seriously, are people that chained to their phones they have to use them during takeoff and landing? Christ almighty.

      • PeterA
        Posted 03/10/2013 at 7:35 am | Permalink | Reply

        I like to read during take-off and landing. Some people read on devices.

        Why are people so quick to judge what we are using phones for?

    5. Jason
      Posted 02/10/2013 at 7:45 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Actually, I don’t thik there’s been many facts involved in the discussion.

      When I was studying Electrical Engineering back in the 90’s, a mate & I were discussing
      electrical radiation. He’s was a Qantas engineer. I asked about how aircraft manages in
      electrical storms. Anyone who owns an AM radio knows that lightning sends out lots of interference across a broad spectrum. My mate said – oh all the instruments are encased in lead for that very reason. They’re also isolated to protect them during a direct lightning strike on an aircraft (which apparently happens quite regularly).

      So I asked why are mobile phones, which output about 1 millionth of the power/energy of a lightning strike causing issues? He said they don’t. No one actually knew why the ban came into play. There were rumours, about mobile phones in aircraft locking up cell towers as they flew over one to the next, but we both agree this was unlikely as cell towers are designed to pick up signals from the ground & the distance to the ground would be too great.

      His theory was that people are afraid of aircraft falling out of the sky, so whilst the fear imaginary, the industry always err’d on the side of caution & reacted by banning mobile phones, because if there was an incident, someone would blame mobile phones & thus in people’s mind the fear was real.

      Personally I like the indeed of a mobile ban, it’s annoying enough on a 30min train trip, let alone a 10hr flight of someone shouting into a phone.

      • PeterA
        Posted 03/10/2013 at 7:29 am | Permalink | Reply

        Re mobile phone towers and signals from the ground.

        In the middle of the melbourne CBD, at between 200 and 250 meters high, outside on the roof of a building (tallest in the particular block) has between 1 bar and no Optus mobile phone reception. (Just in-case someone claims blackspot! there is flawless reception at ground level on all sides of the building.)

        I would be amazed if a mobile tower heard a mobile phone above 500 meters. The only thing this could be about would be attention during takeoff and landing. I believe they play movies during that time these days. (interrupted only for the “this is how you put on a life jacket” video).

        • Oliver Townshend
          Posted 03/10/2013 at 7:48 am | Permalink | Reply

          Remember the 911 flight that crashed into a field? People on that rang home to say goodbye, and they were quite high, well above 500 metres.

          I doubt the telcos like having their towers waste capacity scanning upwards.

    6. Fajooliobongersnap
      Posted 02/10/2013 at 9:47 pm | Permalink | Reply

      @Jason : Another airline professional I know posited another fairly reasonable and logical explanation :

      The crew ask mobile devices to be turned off during takeoff and landing because those are the two most dangerous parts of any flight – ie basically by forcing people to not be buried in their phone/tablet, you’re by extension forcing them to be more alert and focused, should they need to egress the aircraft in a hurry should an emergency arise.

    7. Nich
      Posted 03/10/2013 at 9:34 am | Permalink | Reply

      Losing the first 20-30 mins on a flight – being unable to read on my tablet – means I fall asleep. Not sit there alert in case something happens.

    8. Decka
      Posted 03/10/2013 at 10:56 am | Permalink | Reply

      IMHO if mobile phones etc were that much of a risk to a plane they wouldn’t leave it up to the passenger to do the right thing. It wouldn’t be allowed on the plane in the first place or put in checked in baggage afrer being confirmed off. Leaving such a “risk” in the hands of passengers makes a mockery of the rule. How many times have we heard a phone ringing in the overhead locker on landing.

    9. Posted 07/10/2013 at 10:29 am | Permalink | Reply

      @Fajooliobongersnap, that is true, but doesn’t explain why I can read a heavy hardback book, but can’t read on my Kindle (with 3G/wireless turned off). No difference from a safety perspective.

    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights