• Catch issues early, fix them fast – Free trial


    [ad] With GFI Cloud you can easily manage and secure your remote workforce – wherever they are, from wherever you are! The simple IT management platform includes patch management, antivirus, web protection, monitoring and remote control. Get the benefit of endpoint protection with the ease of central management. Start a free trial now.


  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Analysis, Gadgets - Written by on Friday, September 20, 2013 14:04 - 6 Comments

    In the game of iPhone pricing, consumers are the losers

    iphone-5s-2

    This article is by Jason Downs, associate lecturer in Strategic Management for the School of Management at RMIT University. It originally appeared on The Conversation.

    analysis Game theory is a branch of strategic decision making that tries to predict how players in any strategic game are likely to act. It can be applied in many situations and it can also help to explain what is going on with the hoopla around the release of the new iPhone today.

    5S pricing was released by all carriers last night. Not surprisingly, there are no deep discounts on the handsets. (The variations in pricing seen on websites this morning are mostly based on variable pricing of the data plan components.)

    However up until this morning the telcos were only offering the pricing structures for the iPhone 5C. Why not the 5S? It turns out that they are playing a strategic game of cat-and-mouse with each other. Here’s how.

    A couple of versions of the iPhone have been released: the 5C and the 5S. Each version will come with different capacity to store data (apps, music, photos etc) but otherwise the functional differences are relatively small. Buyers choose either the cheap looking one (the 5C) or the fancy looking one (the 5S). When the product doesn’t have much functional differentiation, the suppliers don’t have much power to split out pricing in a way to divide the market.

    The next thing to understand is the relative standing of the networks when it comes to handset subscriber marketshare. Telstra is the front-runner with the largest share, Optus occupies second position (but are not far behind) and Vodafone bring up the rear with some clear water between them and the other two.

    Vodafone has had significant problems with their network in the past and as a result subscribers have been bleeding away and going to the other providers. One of the ways Vodafone could reverse this would be to offer subsidised handsets and win back marketshare. Is this likely? No.

    The reason is because the big telcos are acting rationally and have an eye on overall, long-term profitability of the game rather than trying to make a quick buck on this release. Each of the players in the game have now developed an understanding of the (tacit) rules of that game because they have each participated in previous releases. It’s rational to assume that each player wants to maximise their returns.

    The telcos are betting a large portion of the Australian market will upgrade to the iPhone 5S, rather than the 5C. They figure the Australian economy has done reasonably well and that most Australians who are in a position to buy a new iPhone would rather be seen with one that conveys a positive signal of their personal wealth and standing than one that conveys a less positive status-signal via the cheaper (although functionally equivalent) model.

    So now the game is set.

    Telstra and Vodafone moved first by releasing their pricing on the cheaper 5C model. This was the safest move because they figure that proportionally less people will opt for this phone due to status-symbol factors. The real game is in the 5S category for which most consumers are likely to opt. The reason why it was important to release the 5C early is it enables each telco to gauge what the likely move of each other is going to be when it comes to releasing the 5S.

    If Vodafone had released pricing that indicated it was prepared to offer deep subsidies in an effort to grab marketshare, it could potentially be read by the other telcos that they would do the same with the 5S release. The likely response from the other telcos would be to equally heavily subsidise handsets. The net result would be that the overall profitability of all telcos would be lessened (although the consumers would benefit because they get cheaper handsets).

    By releasing pricing of the 5C early and showing that neither is prepared to offer discounts, all players in the game might read that as when it comes to the more valuable 5S market that if they all behave in the same way (no deep subsidies), everyone wins (except the poor consumer, that is).

    If Vodafone are desperate enough, it might be a good strategy to advertise that they are not going to subsidise handsets with the 5C and then when they release their pricing on the 5S change strategy, grab a huge part of the market and repair some of the damage that has been recently done in a dastardly double-cross.

    There are two main reasons that this is unlikely: First, pricing can start high but be changed quickly. It is likely that Telstra would be able to outlast Vodafone and Optus in a protracted price war. Secondly, this release of the iPhone will not be the last. There will be iPhone6 and iPhone7 and iPhone_N_ – the game has many more future rounds to go. If discounting begins now, the incentive will be for telcos to discount in future rounds too – dooming all players to poor profitability levels.

    So what does this mean for the consumers? Vodafone or Optus might offer subsidised handsets for the 5S but that wouldn’t be rational behaviour. They’d ultimately lose in a price war.

    So, don’t expect a subsidised iPhone 5S and for that matter don’t expect subsidised iPhones in any other later release either. The Australian consumer is unfortunately caught in the middle of a strategic game in which they have very little power to influence the outcome.

    Jason owns an iPhone 4S and will probably upgrade to a more advanced model with the next release. Unfortunately he is caught in the middle of a much larger game and will probably have to pay heavily for the privilege. This article was originally published at The Conversation. Read the original article. Image credit: Apple

    The Conversation

    submit to reddit

    6 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. stoffs
      Posted 20/09/2013 at 3:25 pm | Permalink |

      better
      options
      elsewhere

    2. Daniel
      Posted 21/09/2013 at 7:35 am | Permalink |

      Go Android. Nobody’s forcing you to be played by Apple and the telecos.

    3. Markie
      Posted 21/09/2013 at 10:58 am | Permalink |

      Had use of a quite big Samsung Android recently – it was quite impressive…

    4. Kevin Cobley
      Posted 21/09/2013 at 1:42 pm | Permalink |

      Apple’s new product development is slowly dwindling away, their always overpriced gimmicky products are starting to be seriously out competed by much cheaper offerings from new companies and existing large Asian electronics giants.
      It’s a good time to sell Apple stock, the company is only headed one way and that’s down.

    5. Timothy Walters
      Posted 23/09/2013 at 9:51 am | Permalink |

      Greedy telcos set high prices on a new popular phone release, and all you guys can do is bash the maker of the phone and promote your pet brand?

      I look forward to reading your comments when they price your favourite version of Android hardware too high, will you likewise tell people to buy Microsoft or Apple phones?

      My guess: you’ll all become hypocrites, feel free to prove me wrong.

    6. Daniel
      Posted 23/09/2013 at 10:00 am | Permalink |

      Timothy, there is a big difference: There is huge competition among multiple manufacturers for Android phones which prevents collusion between telecos and manufacturers and/or inflated prices based on monopoly of supply.

      There is true free-market competition for Android phones and you can choose from hundreds of different phones whose prices are not influenced by the telecos or a single manufacturer.




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds — AustralianSuper, CBus, HESTA and more — is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, as was revealed in November, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well, and the Financial Review last week reported that Superpartners is actually close to turfing it altogether and going back to the drawing board.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights