Great articles on other sites
- $5.2m to put e-tax on Mac
- Galaxy S 4 “Google Edition” to be available in Australia via MobiCity
- When does mission creep become censorship?
- First NBN fibre extension completed
- Proof the internet filter lives on by other means
- Budget 2013: Heavy on 'showcasing', light on strategy
- CGU to replace core insurance system
- Google Australia calls for mandatory comp sci until year 10
- Spectrum fail could help Libs fight Labor's regional NBN
- Offended By Fraudband? Maybe You Shouldn’t Have Said It First
Blog, Telecommunications - Written by Renai LeMay on Thursday, March 7, 2013 12:54 - 13 Comments
Vodafone CEO backs Quigley NBN study
blog Remember how NBN Co chief executive Mike Quigley gave a major speech several weeks ago backing the idea that telco industry group the Communications Alliance could conduct a study into the merits of the various different broadband models being proposed for Australia’s future? Remember how the idea was roundly rejected by the Coalition and various telcos such as Optus? Well not everyone things this way. Vodafone chief executive Bill Morrow in Communications Day this week on the idea:
“NBN Co’s recent calls for an industry discussion on how we optimise the opportunities of the NBN should not be controversial. There will always be ongoing discussions about how we meet the telecommunications needs of Australia. Provided these discussions are done transparently and collaboratively they should be encouraged.”
I strongly agree. How could it possibly be bad to have more analysis, more examination of the potential paths towards Australia’s broadband future? More information is never a bad thing — I think history shows us that ignorance and misinformation is usually the real plague on society. Let’s hope the Communications Alliance consents to working on this. It could prove to be a valuable resource for the whole sector.
| Tweet | |
![]() |
13 Comments
Leave a Comment
-
- Topic
- Voices
- Freshness
Blog, Enterprise IT - May 23, 2013 13:03 - 0 Comments
Perpetual dumps CIO after Fujitsu outsourcing
More In Enterprise IT
- Victoria abandons IT shared services?
Core CenITex services to be outsourced
- Australia gets two Windows Azure datacentres
- Oracle reveals swathe of Aussie rollouts
- Australia’s universities hacked on a regular basis
- 32 years later, CGU replaces insurance IT platform
News, Telecommunications - May 23, 2013 11:57 - 77 Comments
Mass piracy lawsuits are back in Australia:
Law firm targets end users’ details
More In Telecommunications
- Telstra set for massive internal restructure
- iiNet sells TransACT’s FTTP to NBN Co
- At death’s door:
Vodafone loses 216k more customers
- 4G race: Telstra turns on 1500th tower
- Optus launches TD-LTE 4G trial in Canberra
Blog, Gadgets, Gaming - May 23, 2013 14:28 - 16 Comments
Surprise! Xbox One neutered for Australia
More In Gadgets
- Sony Xperia Z tablet hits Australia
- HP Slate 7 to land in Australia shortly
- Why touchscreens matter for laptops
(Or, review of the ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch)
- Amazon Appstore challenging Google Play as Australian launch looms
- Consoles to suffer as tablets triple mobile games downloads by 2017











Again can anyone tell me why we need a study?
Tony Abbott just lied to the public about it costing 3x as much? Shouldn’t we be focusing on these issues rather than the study?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/04/abbott_raises_cost_bogeyman/
Both You, sortius, theregister have done the work that is required…
“Again can anyone tell me why we need a study?”
Because it will show (again) that FTTN is not the right solution for Australia.
I think that’s Quigley’s intention ;)
“How could it possibly be bad to have more analysis, more examination of the potential paths towards Australia’s broadband future? More information is never a bad thing”
You may be right in this case but all too often more studies are just a way of avoiding a decision. How many studies have we had into Sydney’s 2nd airport?
They will not stop rolling out the NBN to do this
The Noalition would… Especially as their version would be arranged to give the answers they want politically.
The report would put to bed, once and for-all the FTTN “is better than” FTTH notion. Turnbull doesn’t want a report he cannot self-engineer; he already knows the outcome. Hence his outright rejection.
Quigley has suggested it, for that very reason. He already knows the outcome too.
It’s not which is the better technology. I don’t think even Turnbull is suggesting it is. What the issue to be decided is which is the best and most economical way foward. Saying FTTN is cheaper just doesn’t cut it. Ignoring what it will cost to upgrade and when it will need that upgrade is the bit Turnbull will avoid like the plague or pull numbers out of his butt. It’s what happens after FTTN that is it’s achilles heel. Hay, maybe having to buy copper will even make it uneconomical now. But without address all the issues and calling supporters zealots and journalists biased they should be answered. Sticking fingers in the ears and going lalala doesn’t solve problems.
http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/government-it/broadband-blues-thousands-stuck-in-the-slow-lane-20130307-2fmw4.html
In MSM highlighting the very poor state of the customer end copper infrastructure which has been well known and discussed in tech circles, now the discussion is beginning in the MSM highlighting the foolishness of a FTTN solution using Telstra’s intentionally run down network.
The plot thickens with non techo’s asking questions
There is no need to for the Communications Alliance to spend money on such a study I can tell you what the result will be.
Keep the current FTTH NBN rollout going financed by Government debt and all risk backed by the Government.
Great, seems we all agree that this is the best path then :)
What else would they say, we will build it?
No of course they won’t build it… no one will… hence the fact that we are now in the position we are… you do remember the RFPs, Telstra’s non-compliant bid and understand this most basic of facts don’t you?