<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Balance&#8217;, &#8216;open&#8217;: Roxon defends data retention plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/</link>
	<description>Just Australia. Just technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:03:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491854</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much data? Well, if you take the #NatSecInquiry dicussion paper&#039;s suggestion, it&#039;s several hundred terabytes per year. Let&#039;s not forget that they need to at least make a pretence of caring about security and verification of chain of control of the evidence, and backup copies... so that really does mean that you have to buy the high end kit to do it with any degree of confidence. The costs mount up very, very quickly. Let&#039;s also not forget the cost of providing the data centres to house the storage, the computer systems to manage the storage (&quot;securely&quot; accessing it and mining it, it ain&#039;t just a flatfile), the security clearances for the staff to manage it, the extra power generation capability that will have to be built in order to run it......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much data? Well, if you take the #NatSecInquiry dicussion paper&#8217;s suggestion, it&#8217;s several hundred terabytes per year. Let&#8217;s not forget that they need to at least make a pretence of caring about security and verification of chain of control of the evidence, and backup copies&#8230; so that really does mean that you have to buy the high end kit to do it with any degree of confidence. The costs mount up very, very quickly. Let&#8217;s also not forget the cost of providing the data centres to house the storage, the computer systems to manage the storage (&#8220;securely&#8221; accessing it and mining it, it ain&#8217;t just a flatfile), the security clearances for the staff to manage it, the extra power generation capability that will have to be built in order to run it&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechinBris</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491740</link>
		<dc:creator>TechinBris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where does the hand go?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does the hand go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechinBris</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491737</link>
		<dc:creator>TechinBris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This whole debacle is a multifaceted problem involving numerous problems, that in general, Societies around the globe have come to reasonable solutions, but find the Dinosauric Corporations and their tamed Governments and Parliament refuse to accept. This has created a paradigm of contentious moves and a Society that utterly refuses to put up with a outdated push model for media, and a Dinosaur media Industry with pets in tow, refusing to give up the &quot;PUSH&quot; model which assist their propaganda machine so well. They are not foolish in realising that the &quot;PULL&quot; model of media self-extinguishes most propaganda delivering models. Hollywood has been dishing out so long it makes a wonderful example.
But it goes even further with the media working to manufacture and give the illusion of consent that absolutely does not exist. We are told to obey the law, but our own Government won&#039;t and Corporation do so with impunity.
On the point of the situation of Copyright, it is now used and abused and is a laughing stock of a model that can no longer work unless a major rewrite occurs protecting all parties and not just the rich and powerful. File Sharing of Copyright material, legally, is not stealing. It is more like &quot;trespassing&quot; and saying it is stealing shows profound ignorance to what the issues really are all about.
Are we all screwed? Absolutely. But only way to make it transparent would be mass rejection in the polls and having our Government decreed upon us, as it was in the good ol&#039; USA years back. See Australia, we have a lot further to fall to catch up to the USA yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole debacle is a multifaceted problem involving numerous problems, that in general, Societies around the globe have come to reasonable solutions, but find the Dinosauric Corporations and their tamed Governments and Parliament refuse to accept. This has created a paradigm of contentious moves and a Society that utterly refuses to put up with a outdated push model for media, and a Dinosaur media Industry with pets in tow, refusing to give up the &#8220;PUSH&#8221; model which assist their propaganda machine so well. They are not foolish in realising that the &#8220;PULL&#8221; model of media self-extinguishes most propaganda delivering models. Hollywood has been dishing out so long it makes a wonderful example.<br />
But it goes even further with the media working to manufacture and give the illusion of consent that absolutely does not exist. We are told to obey the law, but our own Government won&#8217;t and Corporation do so with impunity.<br />
On the point of the situation of Copyright, it is now used and abused and is a laughing stock of a model that can no longer work unless a major rewrite occurs protecting all parties and not just the rich and powerful. File Sharing of Copyright material, legally, is not stealing. It is more like &#8220;trespassing&#8221; and saying it is stealing shows profound ignorance to what the issues really are all about.<br />
Are we all screwed? Absolutely. But only way to make it transparent would be mass rejection in the polls and having our Government decreed upon us, as it was in the good ol&#8217; USA years back. See Australia, we have a lot further to fall to catch up to the USA yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechinBris</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491732</link>
		<dc:creator>TechinBris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since when has being an Internet user made me a criminal? A valid question to ask considering a very important point in law that comes to &quot;innocent till proven guilty.&quot; Who did the reversal, when did it happen and who arranged it that we were not to be told? Equally valid questions.
If we have not had our law changed, why are politicians actively working to pervert the law and justice? Why would they? What is the motive? Who is bankrolling this move as people rarely do things not in their best interests, nor their children&#039;s, unless there is protection and a very healthy gain to be had from it. Basic human nature, unfortunately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when has being an Internet user made me a criminal? A valid question to ask considering a very important point in law that comes to &#8220;innocent till proven guilty.&#8221; Who did the reversal, when did it happen and who arranged it that we were not to be told? Equally valid questions.<br />
If we have not had our law changed, why are politicians actively working to pervert the law and justice? Why would they? What is the motive? Who is bankrolling this move as people rarely do things not in their best interests, nor their children&#8217;s, unless there is protection and a very healthy gain to be had from it. Basic human nature, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leefe</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491699</link>
		<dc:creator>Leefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 02:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will all phone calls start with a recorded message that says &quot;This call may be recorded for AFP and ASIO business.&quot; ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will all phone calls start with a recorded message that says &#8220;This call may be recorded for AFP and ASIO business.&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soth</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491611</link>
		<dc:creator>Soth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hehe and I liked Charlie&#039;s line about Dodo keeping secure data for 2 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe and I liked Charlie&#8217;s line about Dodo keeping secure data for 2 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491605</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dont forget how little time people were given. I spent my time drafting a researched and carefully worded submission i felt was worth sending to avoid any weaseling or misinterpretation on the behalf of the people reviewing the submissions, only to realize i wouldnt be done in time, it was at 5 pages and counting, about half done when i realized i needed several more weeks.

I didnt want to send an &#039;I dont want this ozlog nonsense&#039; form email that could be at all misinterpreted to presume I didnt understand the topic and would be perfectly ok with it if better educated by further political propagandizing using such nasty words as &#039;terrorist&#039; and &#039;pedophile&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont forget how little time people were given. I spent my time drafting a researched and carefully worded submission i felt was worth sending to avoid any weaseling or misinterpretation on the behalf of the people reviewing the submissions, only to realize i wouldnt be done in time, it was at 5 pages and counting, about half done when i realized i needed several more weeks.</p>
<p>I didnt want to send an &#8216;I dont want this ozlog nonsense&#8217; form email that could be at all misinterpreted to presume I didnt understand the topic and would be perfectly ok with it if better educated by further political propagandizing using such nasty words as &#8216;terrorist&#8217; and &#8216;pedophile&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pblakez</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491593</link>
		<dc:creator>pblakez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 06:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is interesting the in the first few paragraphs of Roxen&#039;s speech is this &quot;The responsibility we have to protect that information is immense&quot;  This data retention policy of course abrogates this immediately as there is no way the Australian Government can guarantee that data retained by the Telcos will be protected.

Every organisation on the plant has failed at this CIA, FBI, AFP, ASIO, every state Police Force, every government department, it is a total joke and highly misleading to give the impression that this data can be kept private. 

Roxen needs some hard questioning on this policy (#Note most media are totally incapable on this subject)

How will the Government guarantee the privacy of users information?

Will the Government  be auditing the Telcos to ensure the data is secure, how often after every patch / upgraded network change?

Will the Government  be vetting all employees of the Telcos?

What remedies will be available to Citizens when their data has been breached?

What  penalties will be enforced on those Telcos and employees who are breached ?

How do you restore the reputation of a Citizen whose data has been exposed for instance a woman who may have researched a medical condition, a mental disease?

What  penalties will be enforced on those organisations who use the data to discriminate against a person think Insurance companies/ employment agencies.?

I am sure this list could grow exponentially
Then there is the vexed question of allowing spooks and other &quot;trustworthy&quot; government employees to add, remove and change data on a person&#039;s computer and or device, when I first heard this I honestly put it down as some bad joke or shock jock bullshit but now I am just flabbergasted.

Needless to say it will only be the stupid and uninformed criminals and the naive innocent that this rather fascist legislation will catch, the ones with half a brain will easily circumvent this and actual use this against the innocent users making then look like the perps and as history has already shown us the rather bumbling spooks and law enforcement agencies will fall for just about every dumbass trick in the book.

I could go on all night but have work to do....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting the in the first few paragraphs of Roxen&#8217;s speech is this &#8220;The responsibility we have to protect that information is immense&#8221;  This data retention policy of course abrogates this immediately as there is no way the Australian Government can guarantee that data retained by the Telcos will be protected.</p>
<p>Every organisation on the plant has failed at this CIA, FBI, AFP, ASIO, every state Police Force, every government department, it is a total joke and highly misleading to give the impression that this data can be kept private. </p>
<p>Roxen needs some hard questioning on this policy (#Note most media are totally incapable on this subject)</p>
<p>How will the Government guarantee the privacy of users information?</p>
<p>Will the Government  be auditing the Telcos to ensure the data is secure, how often after every patch / upgraded network change?</p>
<p>Will the Government  be vetting all employees of the Telcos?</p>
<p>What remedies will be available to Citizens when their data has been breached?</p>
<p>What  penalties will be enforced on those Telcos and employees who are breached ?</p>
<p>How do you restore the reputation of a Citizen whose data has been exposed for instance a woman who may have researched a medical condition, a mental disease?</p>
<p>What  penalties will be enforced on those organisations who use the data to discriminate against a person think Insurance companies/ employment agencies.?</p>
<p>I am sure this list could grow exponentially<br />
Then there is the vexed question of allowing spooks and other &#8220;trustworthy&#8221; government employees to add, remove and change data on a person&#8217;s computer and or device, when I first heard this I honestly put it down as some bad joke or shock jock bullshit but now I am just flabbergasted.</p>
<p>Needless to say it will only be the stupid and uninformed criminals and the naive innocent that this rather fascist legislation will catch, the ones with half a brain will easily circumvent this and actual use this against the innocent users making then look like the perps and as history has already shown us the rather bumbling spooks and law enforcement agencies will fall for just about every dumbass trick in the book.</p>
<p>I could go on all night but have work to do&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RocK_M</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491590</link>
		<dc:creator>RocK_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 06:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how everyone loves to use the whole &quot;phone logs/taps&quot; to help solve crimes and yet they miss one interesting nugget - &quot;due process&quot;

Most data retention on devices such as phones and the like is *illegal* unless there is an outstanding warrant for such information gathering (in fact any information gathered outside the scope of a warrant is thrown out). Note the important part... gathering can only be done AFTER there is a need not BEFORE! You cannot keep information unless you can show a *need* for such information to be kept (usually as apart of an investigation)

What this law is saying is that apparently it&#039;s &quot;Ok&quot; to skip the process on the *need* for the information as &quot;we won&#039;t touch it anyway&quot; but it&#039;s there &quot;if we need it&quot; because it&#039;s &quot;easier&quot;. So what this government is saying is that we are all potential criminals and we all need to be &quot;kept tabs on&quot; w/o the need for proof that we are a criminal or not. 

It&#039;s amazing the amount of abuse and circular logic such a system can lead to. As an overused quote of ages past from good olde Franklin - &quot;&quot;He who gives up liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor safety.&quot; &quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how everyone loves to use the whole &#8220;phone logs/taps&#8221; to help solve crimes and yet they miss one interesting nugget &#8211; &#8220;due process&#8221;</p>
<p>Most data retention on devices such as phones and the like is *illegal* unless there is an outstanding warrant for such information gathering (in fact any information gathered outside the scope of a warrant is thrown out). Note the important part&#8230; gathering can only be done AFTER there is a need not BEFORE! You cannot keep information unless you can show a *need* for such information to be kept (usually as apart of an investigation)</p>
<p>What this law is saying is that apparently it&#8217;s &#8220;Ok&#8221; to skip the process on the *need* for the information as &#8220;we won&#8217;t touch it anyway&#8221; but it&#8217;s there &#8220;if we need it&#8221; because it&#8217;s &#8220;easier&#8221;. So what this government is saying is that we are all potential criminals and we all need to be &#8220;kept tabs on&#8221; w/o the need for proof that we are a criminal or not. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing the amount of abuse and circular logic such a system can lead to. As an overused quote of ages past from good olde Franklin &#8211; &#8220;&#8221;He who gives up liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor safety.&#8221; &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491584</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 06:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tezz, VPN&#039;s will not do much at all. You have to join the internet somewhere. Your options will eventually be through a government network that terminates at your house, via a wireless link that you have to provide ~100 points of identity to use or via a hacked connection into someone elses link. Assuming you are onboarding via the first two options then the ISP and the government already know who you are and where you live. As to what you are doing: guesses can be made based on volumes, the grubyment can assume guilt by association, brute force the traffic if it is of interest, meddle with your PC or subpena one of the ends of the VPN - remember the international data sharing legislation passed a couple of years back (opposed by the greens as lacking safeguards, passed by labor and LNP). There is always the Soviet option, if you don&#039;t love the grubyment then you must be crazy.

This type of legislation is being proposed throughout the free west and many non free countries already have it so you will be hard pressed to do anything useful with the VPN for long. While people blame the media companies for the push, I believe they are just a cover. The criminals behind this are the international finance community, that is why the politicians are so eager to lay down and have their heads patted. Currency in almost all the world is privately issued (not government issued), is based upon entrapping whole countries in debt, is backed by nothing but the promise that the serfs will continue to labour and commands massive transfers of wealth to its proponents. Currency and the fraud that go with it must be protected at all costs.

Pirate community mesh networks will be one of the few ways of getting around this latest wet dream by our oh so capable public sector but traffic will still be exposed at internet onboarding points - especially if these are aggregated by a single network. It will be interesting to see what technologies develop and the over the top legal responses by the grubyment based upon increasingly trivial infractions of arbitrary laws. I recall a child porn case a few years back whereby someone who was part of a TOR network  was prosecuted for having a fragment of an encrypted image on their hard drives. This suggests that any solution to our useless public sector should not involve store and forward and should be distributed over many onboarding points - but even then geography would still give the game away. 

Alternately, encourage all your peers to stop voting for tyrants. Forget Get-Up, we need a Sit-Down campaign.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tezz, VPN&#8217;s will not do much at all. You have to join the internet somewhere. Your options will eventually be through a government network that terminates at your house, via a wireless link that you have to provide ~100 points of identity to use or via a hacked connection into someone elses link. Assuming you are onboarding via the first two options then the ISP and the government already know who you are and where you live. As to what you are doing: guesses can be made based on volumes, the grubyment can assume guilt by association, brute force the traffic if it is of interest, meddle with your PC or subpena one of the ends of the VPN &#8211; remember the international data sharing legislation passed a couple of years back (opposed by the greens as lacking safeguards, passed by labor and LNP). There is always the Soviet option, if you don&#8217;t love the grubyment then you must be crazy.</p>
<p>This type of legislation is being proposed throughout the free west and many non free countries already have it so you will be hard pressed to do anything useful with the VPN for long. While people blame the media companies for the push, I believe they are just a cover. The criminals behind this are the international finance community, that is why the politicians are so eager to lay down and have their heads patted. Currency in almost all the world is privately issued (not government issued), is based upon entrapping whole countries in debt, is backed by nothing but the promise that the serfs will continue to labour and commands massive transfers of wealth to its proponents. Currency and the fraud that go with it must be protected at all costs.</p>
<p>Pirate community mesh networks will be one of the few ways of getting around this latest wet dream by our oh so capable public sector but traffic will still be exposed at internet onboarding points &#8211; especially if these are aggregated by a single network. It will be interesting to see what technologies develop and the over the top legal responses by the grubyment based upon increasingly trivial infractions of arbitrary laws. I recall a child porn case a few years back whereby someone who was part of a TOR network  was prosecuted for having a fragment of an encrypted image on their hard drives. This suggests that any solution to our useless public sector should not involve store and forward and should be distributed over many onboarding points &#8211; but even then geography would still give the game away. </p>
<p>Alternately, encourage all your peers to stop voting for tyrants. Forget Get-Up, we need a Sit-Down campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tezz</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491561</link>
		<dc:creator>Tezz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 03:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe the handing over of passwords during an investigation is a part of these proposals, of course anyone who is using a VPN (or encrypted) for all traffic will kind of stand out from the pack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the handing over of passwords during an investigation is a part of these proposals, of course anyone who is using a VPN (or encrypted) for all traffic will kind of stand out from the pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elementalest</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491557</link>
		<dc:creator>elementalest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 03:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly, circumventing data retention is easy with VPN. Which makes this whole argument pointless and a waste of time. Someone should tell the government about VPN and data encryption.

Then there&#039;s options like the Tor project https://www.torproject.org/index.html.en, which gives you even more anonymity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, circumventing data retention is easy with VPN. Which makes this whole argument pointless and a waste of time. Someone should tell the government about VPN and data encryption.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s options like the Tor project <a href="https://www.torproject.org/index.html.en" rel="nofollow">https://www.torproject.org/index.html.en</a>, which gives you even more anonymity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franc</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491549</link>
		<dc:creator>franc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been suggesting this for a long time. That all members of government and their families should have all their &#039;net activities available for live viewing on a public portal. After all, if they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been suggesting this for a long time. That all members of government and their families should have all their &#8216;net activities available for live viewing on a public portal. After all, if they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arafurian</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491548</link>
		<dc:creator>Arafurian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, I&#039;ve had a great idea! If having everything - emails, the lot - saved up so the Government can read them any time it wants to, how about we just do the job properly: we can jsut pass a law to say that all files - including Government files - get posted onto Wikileaks, where everybody can read them. That way, there&#039;d be just one type of privacy for everyone (that is, none), and no risk of anything being hacked! Fair&#039;s fair, Nicole: if you want us to share our Internet activities with everyone, then you should be willing to share yours too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;ve had a great idea! If having everything &#8211; emails, the lot &#8211; saved up so the Government can read them any time it wants to, how about we just do the job properly: we can jsut pass a law to say that all files &#8211; including Government files &#8211; get posted onto Wikileaks, where everybody can read them. That way, there&#8217;d be just one type of privacy for everyone (that is, none), and no risk of anything being hacked! Fair&#8217;s fair, Nicole: if you want us to share our Internet activities with everyone, then you should be willing to share yours too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franc</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491547</link>
		<dc:creator>franc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course there is a lesser known, and particularly noxious, provision appended to all of this - to make it a jailable criminal offense to not divulge passwords and hand over keys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course there is a lesser known, and particularly noxious, provision appended to all of this &#8211; to make it a jailable criminal offense to not divulge passwords and hand over keys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franc</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491546</link>
		<dc:creator>franc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No - asynchonous encryption relies on public and private keys, Your private key never gets transmitted -

&quot;Although it is computationally easy for the intended recipient to generate the public and private keys, to decrypt the message using the private key, and easy for the sender to encrypt the message using the public key, it is extremely difficult (or effectively impossible) for anyone to derive the private key, based only on their knowledge of the public key. This is why, unlike symmetric key algorithms, a public key algorithm does not require a secure initial exchange of one (or more) secret keys between the sender and receiver. &quot;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asynchronous_encryption

&quot;Brute force&quot; is not always feasible, providing you have sensibly created your private key, and is not cheap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8211; asynchonous encryption relies on public and private keys, Your private key never gets transmitted -</p>
<p>&#8220;Although it is computationally easy for the intended recipient to generate the public and private keys, to decrypt the message using the private key, and easy for the sender to encrypt the message using the public key, it is extremely difficult (or effectively impossible) for anyone to derive the private key, based only on their knowledge of the public key. This is why, unlike symmetric key algorithms, a public key algorithm does not require a secure initial exchange of one (or more) secret keys between the sender and receiver. &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asynchronous_encryption" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asynchronous_encryption</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Brute force&#8221; is not always feasible, providing you have sensibly created your private key, and is not cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franc</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491536</link>
		<dc:creator>franc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two quotes spring to mind -

&quot;Ignorance is no excuse for a law&quot; (that is *not* a misquote, re-read it)
&quot;The path to hell is paved with good intentions&quot;

The other point most folks are missing - this is &quot;blank cheque&quot; policy, fueled by superstitious fears of shadows and noises beyond the light of the camp fire (e.g. terrorists, pedophiles and organised crimes).

If our &quot;security&quot; organisations are so hell bent on this, then they need to realise nothing is free. In simple terms - &quot;You want tasers? Ok, no problem, it will have to come out of your hand gun budget&quot;. They can&#039;t have everything, and they can&#039;t have it for free. If it is really that important, they can pay for it, and it will mean cutting back elsewhere.

It is a testament to the shallowness of these proposals that no consideration to this is given. In effect, Roxon wants to jail the Australian population - but we will need to pay for and build the jails ourselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two quotes spring to mind -</p>
<p>&#8220;Ignorance is no excuse for a law&#8221; (that is *not* a misquote, re-read it)<br />
&#8220;The path to hell is paved with good intentions&#8221;</p>
<p>The other point most folks are missing &#8211; this is &#8220;blank cheque&#8221; policy, fueled by superstitious fears of shadows and noises beyond the light of the camp fire (e.g. terrorists, pedophiles and organised crimes).</p>
<p>If our &#8220;security&#8221; organisations are so hell bent on this, then they need to realise nothing is free. In simple terms &#8211; &#8220;You want tasers? Ok, no problem, it will have to come out of your hand gun budget&#8221;. They can&#8217;t have everything, and they can&#8217;t have it for free. If it is really that important, they can pay for it, and it will mean cutting back elsewhere.</p>
<p>It is a testament to the shallowness of these proposals that no consideration to this is given. In effect, Roxon wants to jail the Australian population &#8211; but we will need to pay for and build the jails ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Eddy</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491535</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love David Popes cartoon on this!

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/photogallery/opinion/cartoons/david-pope-20120214-1t3j0.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love David Popes cartoon on this!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canberratimes.com.au/photogallery/opinion/cartoons/david-pope-20120214-1t3j0.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.canberratimes.com.au/photogallery/opinion/cartoons/david-pope-20120214-1t3j0.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tezz</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491533</link>
		<dc:creator>Tezz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For everyone saying to use a VPN provider can you please explain how this will help?

All data transferred will be recorded, including the initial passing of keys when the VPN is established, and even if there is no key transfer all the data is sitting there for it to be brute force hacked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For everyone saying to use a VPN provider can you please explain how this will help?</p>
<p>All data transferred will be recorded, including the initial passing of keys when the VPN is established, and even if there is no key transfer all the data is sitting there for it to be brute force hacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itgrrl</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2012/09/04/balance-open-roxon-defends-data-retention-plans/#comment-491531</link>
		<dc:creator>itgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=136813#comment-491531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting backflip from Ms. Roxon&#039;s recent statements that the reforms would be shelved for the time being because the government &amp; intelligence agencies haven&#039;t made a compelling case for their need. I guess she&#039;s now attempting to start making the case… Although using an episode of L.A. Law to help make the case is a somewhat bizarre way to go about it.

I hope that everyone commenting here made a submission to the enquiry… There were appallingly few submissions made (just 177) for such an important issue. Clearly most people either &quot;don&#039;t care&quot; or &quot;don&#039;t get it&quot;. Disappointing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting backflip from Ms. Roxon&#8217;s recent statements that the reforms would be shelved for the time being because the government &amp; intelligence agencies haven&#8217;t made a compelling case for their need. I guess she&#8217;s now attempting to start making the case… Although using an episode of L.A. Law to help make the case is a somewhat bizarre way to go about it.</p>
<p>I hope that everyone commenting here made a submission to the enquiry… There were appallingly few submissions made (just 177) for such an important issue. Clearly most people either &#8220;don&#8217;t care&#8221; or &#8220;don&#8217;t get it&#8221;. Disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
