• Catch issues early, fix them fast – Free trial


    [ad] With GFI Cloud you can easily manage and secure your remote workforce – wherever they are, from wherever you are! The simple IT management platform includes patch management, antivirus, web protection, monitoring and remote control. Get the benefit of endpoint protection with the ease of central management. Start a free trial now.


  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites


  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Written by on Wednesday, June 6, 2012 11:58 - 19 Comments

    CSIRO still running Windows 98, NT

    blog Sometimes you can’t help but be amused by the longevity of Microsoft’s operating systems. In an otherwise unrelated article on the organisation’s adoption of Internet Protocol version 6, an article published by ZDNet.com.au yesterday revealed that Australia’s peak scientific research agency was still running some copies of Windows 98 and NT4. John Gibbins, IT security operations team leader at CSIRO, reportedly said:

    “We still have Windows 98 and NT4 boxes on our network. I think if we searched hard enough we would find Windows 3.1 boxes that aren’t on the network.”

    The issue came up because these old Microsoft operating systems (Windows 98 was released in 1998 and NT4 in 1996) don’t easily support IPv6, unlike most of the rest of the network of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), which typically runs a mix of Windows 7 and Windows XP.

    To be honest, I can’t say I’m really surprised — but I am amused. And I bet none of Microsoft’s NT4 developers expected their glorious accomplishment to still be in use in 16 years’ time. Perhaps my biggest question is why these Win98 and NT instances haven’t been virtualised yet; it seems like that would be the normal approach these days, if the platform still needed to be used for some specific software packages.

    Image credit: Screenshot of Windows 98 default desktop, sourced from Wikipedia

    submit to reddit

    19 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Matthew
      Posted 06/06/2012 at 12:02 pm | Permalink |

      They probably haven’t been virtualised because nobody is game to touch the systems at all, for fear of breaking them entirely. I know I’d be particularly reticent about so much as restarting a Win 98 box these days.

    2. Uriah
      Posted 06/06/2012 at 12:13 pm | Permalink |

      The reason why they probably haven’t been virtualized is likely due to what they’re doing.

      At my company we have some machines running old operating systems, nothing as old as this, but quite old. The reason we maintain them is due to the software they’re running, and the peripherals they have. For example, we one machine which runs an old 16bit application which is a control/reporting interface which uses some ISA card which connects to the machine using some proprietary protocol. This machine is used for doing… science. (Not sure exactly, but it’s used somewhat regularly)

      To replace the machine would cost the business a lot of money, with very little gain. The machine in question isn’t on our network, and literally does this 1 task.

      We’ve got other machines that need to be connected to specialized instrumentation via serial/etc, some of which we’ve managed to virtualize or upgrade, but others which failed when we tried to.

      Overall, some of this old stuff is hard to get away from. You can’t do much about it, short of replacing the machine, which can run into the millions of dollars.

    3. Ben
      Posted 06/06/2012 at 2:28 pm | Permalink |

      This would not suprise anyone who’s done IT in a research organisation. Labs around the world have ancient PCs which are key parts of bespoke experimental setups, logging data or controlling apparatus through barely custom built 8-bit ISA controllers and so on.

      It’s not practical or even necessary to replace most of them, and many of these systems don’t even need a network interface. The biggest problems for organisations running these relics are things like sourcing spare parts, finding IT staff who know how to cable up a 5.25 inch FDD and who can make sense of that 20 year old qbasic program that drives the whole thing.

      • midspace
        Posted 06/06/2012 at 3:16 pm | Permalink |

        Seriously? There are organisations looking to hire IT people who know this stuff?

        • Steve
          Posted 06/06/2012 at 7:27 pm | Permalink |

          There’s also a lot of old industrial hardware. Built in the 80′s/90′s, designed to have lets say a 30-year lifespan without issue…and so naturally the electronics side runs with old floppy as input or a 486 as a control unit. possibly running an early ms-dos, and with ISA output cards that mean you cant just upgrade it.

          I keep working hardware around from the 286 era onwards, just for the rare occasions that they’re suddenly and urgently needed.

          • Posted 06/06/2012 at 7:30 pm | Permalink |

            I think I’ve still got an ISA card around here somewhere, from our first computer….XT8086….My dad jerry-rigged it with 20 MEGAbytes of HDD and 2, count them people, 2 x 5.25″ Floppies AND a 3.25″!

            Wish I’d never given it to my school. Brilliant keepsake….and they dumped it after the comp. teacher who loved it left.

    4. Bern
      Posted 06/06/2012 at 3:17 pm | Permalink |

      Wait a minute – aren’t all those scientists on the ‘gravy train’? Shouldn’t they be able to afford new PCs?

      That’s what the global warming deniers tell me, anyway… :-P

      But seriously – yeah, probably need to run old software to interface with old hardware… we had a client who was running an NT4 box until very recently, to keep an old piece of software running. Mind you, it wasn’t on the network, so IPv6 wasn’t really an issue. Getting the data off with no USB support was a pain, though (especially when the software produced datasets measured in hundreds of megabytes!).

      • Posted 06/06/2012 at 3:24 pm | Permalink |

        No USB support … now that really is going back a while. *shudders*

      • SMEMatt
        Posted 06/06/2012 at 3:57 pm | Permalink |

        The old serial null modem cable has worked wonders for me in the past to get data of these types of systems.
        Although slow is less painful than shuffling disks.

        • Daniel996
          Posted 07/06/2012 at 7:12 pm | Permalink |

          Parallel and serial LapLink cables used to be an essential part of my toolkit!

    5. PointZeroOne
      Posted 06/06/2012 at 3:38 pm | Permalink |

      Doesn’t surprise me at all. As others have said they’ll be running hardware that was designed for these OSes and that haven’t been updated.

      One place I worked at they had a weather station on the roof and the box hooked up to that for the reporting was Win ’95 because that’s what it was originally setup with and what the software ran on and they had no business requirement to upgrade.

      • SMEMatt
        Posted 06/06/2012 at 3:53 pm | Permalink |

        I have and old old Dell laptop here with no battery(long since shot and haven’t been able to replace but it doesn’t matter) still used with one specific bit of kit because I haven’t been able to get the software to run virtualized or under a newer OS or hardware and still successfully communicate with the bit of hardware it controls.

        Went through a significant number of RS232 interfaces (USB, PCI, PCMCIA ect..) for another bit of hardware when even though the software was perfectly happy on even windows 7 64bit the hardware just wouldn’t talk to any old RS232 port.

        Thankfully all these are control systems and don’t need to be on the network to dump data. Although my stock of floppy disks for loading configuration files for an old DOS based embedded system is running low.

    6. SMEMatt
      Posted 06/06/2012 at 4:06 pm | Permalink |

      Equipment we have that I would like to bin.

      Overhead projector, still have one and will bin it once the last lamp we have finally gives out. Did get used for some paying work a month or so back.

      Old Panasonic professional SVHS player, – Get fired up and test once a year just in case because we know we will never be able to get another one if we need it in a hurry. Had two and now down to one still working.

      Varies video interfaces that support obscure video connection that haven’t been in use since the early 90s. Only keep these because they don’t take up much room and I want to one day cause a heart attack when I say yes we can support this 20 year old bit of kit at a conference. Although did use one of them recently to connect an old arcade machine to a LCD screen.

      About a year after we retired and sold our fleet of Kodak SAVs(slide projectors) after having them sit on the shelf not being used for 5years we had a request for one.

    7. Posted 06/06/2012 at 6:40 pm | Permalink |

      Doesn’t surprise me.

      When I was at Wollongong Uni, they were doing some pretty complex biorganic chemistry research in their main labs…..on Windows NT4. Mainly this was because the ASM unit they were using was that old. They didn’t have the money to replace it, at about $400 000 a pop and it’s interface was so touchy, anything even REMOTELY related to XP made its’ sphincter close up faster than the airspeed of an unladen African Sparrow.

      They had a BITCH of a time getting the data off. The ASM used to produce files about 25-30mb per run and the computer had had its’ cd-rom replaced about a dozen times. But they had to keep sending them away to get repaired because new ones wouldn’t take properly, or they’d drop half the data because of buffer underrun.

      And that was just their ASM. Their old HPLC machine used a unix system that connected to a Windows 98 machine. It was eventually replaced and we used the new one when I was there, running XP I think. But if there was contention on use, you used to see the Post-Grads digging away for the right floppy disk in the lab….

    8. Brendan.
      Posted 07/06/2012 at 11:56 am | Permalink |

      The joys of highly specialised software and systems.

      Typically, it isn’t so much a lack of wanting to shift systems, as much as whether it’s a) still developed, b) still supported c) upgradable to newer host operating systems and most importantly d) financially viable to BE upgraded.

      You’ll see this in most any specialist large business or, more particularly, research; where systems have a very focused purpose, potentially written for specifically that one task, perhaps controlling a piece of diagnostic or research related hardware.

      Things don’t always change at the speed of light. ;)

    9. Duke
      Posted 08/06/2012 at 4:16 pm | Permalink |

      Ah, my briefcase, ah, memories…

    10. Ali Robertson
      Posted 11/06/2012 at 9:02 pm | Permalink |

      Not in the least bit surprising. I know some companies that do research: chances are that those PCs are display units for highly specialized (e.g. one off) hardware, where there were about 5 built in that era, there’s a new model now (but it costs more than a house), and nobody is game to re-write the device driver for NT kernel or whatever…

    11. Huy Ha
      Posted 12/06/2012 at 11:35 am | Permalink |

      Most of the issues relates to getting support for proprietary hardware such as ISA cards, LPT licensed dongles or very specialised software where the company no longer exists. None of these place nice with a newer OS, and chances are cost more than the latest computer itself!

    12. Posted 22/02/2013 at 8:24 pm | Permalink |

      Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve consider your stuff previous to and you are just too excellent. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you are saying and the way during which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it wise. I cant wait to read far more from you. This is really a tremendous web site.




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds — AustralianSuper, CBus, HESTA and more — is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, as was revealed in November, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well, and the Financial Review last week reported that Superpartners is actually close to turfing it altogether and going back to the drawing board.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights