• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Blog, Gaming - Written by on Tuesday, May 15, 2012 14:12 - 10 Comments

    Blizzard honours GAME’s Diablo III pre-orders

    blog Pre-ordered hit Diablo III from dying Australian video game retailer GAME? Frustrated that you won’t be able to play this year’s biggest game when it launches at 5PM today, as GAME has been blocked from selling Diablo III? Worry no more. Blizzard’s got your back. From the Battle.net forums, via Kotaku:

    “We’re aware that some Australian GAME customers have been left out in the cold on what should be the hottest night of the year — the launch of Diablo III. To help with this situation and get these players into the game as soon as possible, we’ve put the following process in place.

    Australian GAME customers with a valid preorder/prepurchase receipt dated before May 15, 2012 can do the following:
    1. Purchase the digital version of Diablo III from http://www.diablo3.com now or anytime before May 21, 2012.

    2. Download and start playing when the servers go live!

    3. Submit your GAME Australia preorder/prepurchase receipt to us before June 30, 2012.

    4. Receive a credit from Blizzard, for the amount you paid in advance to GAME Australia for Diablo III. This credit will be applied to the payment method used for the digital purchase.

    We’ll post further details here on how to submit your GAME Australia receipt to our customer service team as soon as possible. Stay tuned, and we look forward to seeing you in the Burning Hells!”

    Now that’s customer service worthy of Deckard Cain. Of course, our advice would have been to just have bought Diablo III direct from Blizzard in the first place like the dark demon gods of capitalism would have preferred in the first place (as yours truly did). But then, there are still many people sacrificing themselves on Australia’s retail gaming altar.

    Image credits: Blizzard

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Gav
      Posted 15/05/2012 at 3:29 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Its a positive step by Blizzard, but several things still frustrate me.

      First, I, like so many others, preordered the collectors edition, specifically to get the physical copy. Until that is honored, the rest is pointless.

      Second, it does little to get refunds back from GAME, who are the guilty party in all this. They knew this was coming, and did nothing to make the situation better. No warning to staff, no advice to clients, simply stopping the release of games and sucking up their deposits.

      And thirdly, plenty of people will have gone and simply bought a physical copy off the shelves of competitors, and thus have the game allready. Accepted their deposit is lost, and gotten on with their lives. There will be plenty of people that simply want to play the game, so wont be buying the digital copy where they can get that deposit back.

      GAME, even if you somehow trade your way out of this, you’ve lost customers. You would have known this was coming, and have taken the delibrate action to steal from your most loyal customers – those willing to invest in your company over others. The damage has been done, its going to be a hard sell to get that lost custom back when there are so many other options.

      Blizzard, does that commitment to honor pre-order deposits go as far as the $140 full payment some people will have made?

      • Brendan.
        Posted 16/05/2012 at 11:00 am | Permalink | Reply

        “Its a positive step by Blizzard, but several things still frustrate me.”

        Realistically, Blizzard could have simply said “sucks to be you” and not done anything; it’s not their fault a retailer tried to cash in on a launch to try and trade it’s way out of trouble.

        Giving a credit on the game itself is the right thing; it’s a shame that doesn’t cover the full deluxe box set, but it’s certainly better than nothing.

        Nice work, Blizzard.

        • James
          Posted 16/05/2012 at 12:48 pm | Permalink | Reply


          I’ll bet EA wouldn’t have done anything =P

          • SMEMatt
            Posted 16/05/2012 at 1:59 pm | Permalink | Reply

            Actually maybe they might have. What blizzard are effectively doing is converting a number of gamers who buy through physical channels to use there online store just this once and maybe again for all future purchases once they have a first positive experience, compared against the negative experience of having a pre-order cancelled and money deposit withheld. EA are trying to push their new online sales platform and it is very cheap global advertising in their target demographic. I just don’t think EA would have thought to do it first place.

        • Gav
          Posted 16/05/2012 at 1:30 pm | Permalink | Reply

          Oh definitely. Blizzard has certainly gotten a healthy amount of good PR out of this, no question. Its a relatively small decision for them, with positive results. As a simple advertising exercise its a win for them for sure, and at very little cost.

          While I ask questions seemingly of Blizzard, my issues arent with them, but with GAME. if it wasnt for them, Blizzard wouldnt have had to do this. If they hadnt, we wouldnt have thought better or worse of them.

          But the frustrations are still there. People pre order for a reason, and to have that reason denied them a day before release hurts on some level. Its only a game, and I dont expect a response from Blizzard that will magically get me a CE edition, my deposit back, and somehow solve world hunger, but I still feel a need to vent. And when there is even a glimmer of hope, why not ask?


          they wouldnt. Battlefield 3 was a classic example. Windows Vista/7 only game, and you might easily not know until AFTER you had activated the game code. It was in fine print on the box, grey on grey writing so hard to see. Response from them was basically ‘tough luck, you should have better than XP by now’ with no recourse. Couldnt even return the game. And when talking to the games staff about it, they were as surprised as me.

          I just sent a feedback response to them advising that it caught me AND the store staff out. Nobody was aware of the limitation, and at the time there were very few games that were Vista+. All it would have taken was a system compatibility check BEFORE the rego code was activated, and there would have been no fuss. But it was AFTER, which hit a nerve. They have your money, there is no way to get it back.

          As it was, I had the money to get Win 7 anyhow, and had been looking to upgrade a week or so later, so I got the game running, but the experience left me very sour with EA.

    2. seven_tech
      Posted 15/05/2012 at 5:11 pm | Permalink | Reply

      With Steam, Battle.Net and the PSN etc. I think we are watching the demise of the physical game store retailer before our very eyes…..

    3. Goddy
      Posted 15/05/2012 at 5:25 pm | Permalink | Reply

      A class act by Blizzard. I expected nothing less from them.

    4. Posted 16/05/2012 at 11:10 am | Permalink | Reply

      Past my local Game store yesterday, and noticed they still have ‘display only’ copies of Diablo III on display. Giving people false hope?

    5. Tom
      Posted 16/05/2012 at 8:17 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I’m curious why you would advise people to buy direct from Blizzard? It costs 80AUD direct from Blizzard. JB Hifi are selling it for $69, and you can get it from Dick Smith Electronics and Big W for $59.

      There’s your number 1 reason Blizzard are doing this, they’ll get more money out of ex-GAME customers than they otherwise would.

      Australian retail really sucks doesn’t it? Or are you just upset Renae that you got suckered by Blizzard and want to share the pain around?

      • James
        Posted 18/05/2012 at 9:22 am | Permalink | Reply

        “JB Hifi are selling it for $69, and you can get it from Dick Smith Electronics and Big W for $59″

        Big W had it advertised for $58, so JB price-matched for me =)
        EB Games would probably do the same.

    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights