• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Enterprise IT, News - Written by on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 14:04 - 6 Comments

    NSW Govt may scrap IT shared services units

    blog According to the Financial Review, the New South Wales Government has indicated it may follow in the footsteps of fellow states Queensland and Western Australia and drastically re-work its IT shared services strategy, in the wake of questionable benefits having flowed from the scheme.

    It’s never been a very transparent strategy — and the previous Labor Government in NSW definitely didn’t enjoy answering questions on the matter — but for several years now the state has focused on delivering IT services to a number of agencies through several shared services divisions, including ServiceFirst, which was quietly created from the mergers of a number of agencies in 2008, BusinessLink and one or two others. However, the Financial Review revealed this morning in an extensive interview with NSW Finance Minister Greg Pearce (click here for the full article) that the IT shared services strategy may be changing dramatically — and soon. According to the AFR, Pearce said:

    “What we’ve done is essentially stopped a lot of the shared services work that was going on,” he said. “We’re looking very hard at BusinessLink and ServiceFirst and whether we should be in that business at all or how to get value if we stay.”

    As you may recall, on Delimiter I have argued very strongly that IT shared services models in Australian governments are fundamentally broken and need to evolve. From Victoria to Queensland and of course Western Australia, Australian states have comprehensively proven by now that the IT shared services model as it is currently understood simply does not work well in Australia. The evidence for this is contained in a series of audit reports issued by the various state auditor-generals over the past half-decade. They literally document five years of disasters in the space.

    If the NSW Government walks away from the IT shared services model it will be the third Australian state government to do so in a year, following similar moves by Western Australia and Queensland. In addition, Victoria’s own model is similarly in question. I hardly need to go into the problems which have been suffered by its IT shared services agency CenITex at this point — they are already legend within Australia’s IT industry. Perhaps the only state government which has appear to be relatively successful at IT shared services is the Australian Capital Territory with its InTACT unit. But … we haven’t heard much from the ACT in this area in a while. Perhaps the house is burning down there too.

    I actually don’t have a great deal of confidence that NSW’s new Coalition State Government can pull the state out of its deep hole when it comes to delivering IT projects. So far, every indication has been that the O’Farrell Government understands this area as little as the previous Labor governments. But I suppose one can hope. Hope may just be the only thing which public sector IT workers have left at this point.

    Image credit: Zsuzsanna Kilian, royalty free

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Rod Werc
      Posted 17/04/2012 at 5:30 pm | Permalink | Reply

      It shared services has meant the a significant increased cost for innovation in service delivery and a blow to a struggling productivity engine.

    2. citizen
      Posted 17/04/2012 at 10:10 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Shared Service models are too big and cumbersome. They limit departmental productivity through standardisation that further limits creativity, productivity, and operatability. Service First and Business Link, great idea on paper. Service levels have probably plummeted though, like service from any large department or company.

    3. Bob
      Posted 19/04/2012 at 9:42 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Shared services models are great for the power brokers and empire builders in NSW Govt departments. NSW Health is a prime example of this. Millions of $$$ being poured down the gurgler with little to no benefits. Just more expensive services.

      Hey, I’m an IT contractor and I’m cleaning up on this gravy train, so I shouldn’t complain too much!

    4. Ex Public Servant
      Posted 26/04/2012 at 9:33 am | Permalink | Reply

      That’d be fine if Finance were holding the reins, but it’s Treasury and DPC who are calling the shots. It’s all very well for a politician to act as a talking head, but the fact is that the petty bureaucrats are the ones pushing their agenda. It’s no secret that ServiceFirst and BusinessLink are utterly hopeless, but there is no agenda to set the bar high for ICT. Rather, the beancounters and spindoctors want to set it to lowest common denominator, and none of those involved have the first idea about what they’re doing.

      What’s happened is that they’ve realised that the expenditure to “fix” ServiceFirst and BusinessLink to suit their agendas is never going to fly. These are the programs that have been suspended. NSW doesn’t have any answer on how to effectively deliver ICT. There are so many issues with the governance in place that they wouldn’t have the first clue on who to ask and what direction to set. And so the task falls to the least suited people in government, who really just want their own little empires to manage.

      The only clear answer that one can derive from this is that there is no good reason to work in ICT within the NSW Government.

    5. Nick Miller
      Posted 23/10/2012 at 1:25 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Renai, do you think the recent Federal ICT strategy (https://agimo.govspace.gov.au/2012/10/04/aps-ict-strategy-2012-2015/) is also basically a shared services model?

      I’m thinking in particular of the Grants Management system proposal.

    6. Brandy elmsen
      Posted 18/03/2013 at 8:40 pm | Permalink | Reply

      All I have to say, the shared providers have done this to themselves. They really do not know how to provide a shared service across agencies and ensure a supportive company is in place. Undisclosed, I have witnessed certain “shared service companies” purchase and spend millions of dollars in systems that are poorly planned and designed, thus wasting money down drains due to state wide systematic errors.

      It is sad really, because the CIO of IT, the CEO of the company should be held accountable for direction and purpose, and to any of you that think outsourcing the shared service, duplicating costs to vendors is simply irresponsible and desperate.
      Everyone should take example of IBM with supporting staff, infrastructure, SLA and system design. No one ever models around successful vendors. It is sad really, because shared services can work, if properly planned.

    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights