• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Enterprise IT, Opinion - Written by on Friday, March 30, 2012 12:59 - 8 Comments

    The datacentres that ate NSW

    This article is by Peter James, the managing director of cloud computing company Ninefold. It first appeared on Ninefold’s blog and is re-published here with the company’s permission.

    opinion Back in 2009, the NSW government commenced a process to identify a vendor to build two datacentre sites in the state – one in Sydney and one in the Illawarra region. However, this process is potentially becoming another Steven Bradbury moment, awarding the prize to the last person standing.

    The original plan was for those datacentres to be built and operational by 2011/12, and then used by all NSW government agencies. A major factor in this consolidation was the volume of small, inefficient datacentres and expensive co-location space taken up by the various agencies acting independently. The model was based purely on co-location capacity and assumed that the state government would continue to invest large CAPEX dollars in IT hardware.

    From a list of 17 respondents, the initial expressions of interest were shortlisted to five players; each invited to respond to a request for tender (RFT) issued by the government in November 2010. At that stage, it was forecast before the March state election that the facilities would be available in 2012.

    Since that RFT was first issued to the five shortlisted vendors, three have dropped out. Now down to just two players, and more than a year after the tenders closed, there has still been no winner announced. Indeed, there has been periodic speculation that the RFT will – and should – be cancelled.

    Regardless of the outcome, the winner will still need to complete the planning process and then build the new facilities. Based on industry experience, it is likely to be at least two years before these NSW government facilities will become fully operational – some five years after the consolidation process was first proposed.

    In the meantime, the Federal Government has established a panel of multiple providers. This panel is open for the NSW Government to use with a minimum take-up of 500 square metres or 500kW of IT load. Nine of the datacentres included in the panel are (or are planned to be) based in NSW. New datacentres continue to be announced, including facilities for Macquarie Telecom, Fujitsu and Hewlett-Packard. The private sector has responded to demand and is rushing to meet supply.

    So why is it that the NSW government continues to run a tender to invest in purpose-built facilities? Why continue to pursue old-world thinking that is based on a long-term lease (minimum of 10 years) with a committed footprint? The need for physical space is diminishing rapidly, with virtualisation and now cloud technology becoming more prevalent. Indeed, it is not even based on power – where we are simultaneously seeing a push to higher density computing.

    Is this another white elephant? When is the state government going to join us in the 21st century and commit to cloud computing? Vivek Kundra, the former US Federal Chief Information Officer, responded to the multiplicity of US government datacentres by mandating agencies begin using cloud technology – they have forecast savings of over $20 billion.

    Today, all governments are feeling the pressure of tight, fiscally driven budgets. Cloud infrastructure provides an opportunity to match usage to demand as and when required. There is no need for over-spec’ing to ensure capacity is there at some future date. Surely it is time for some fresh thinking in NSW government procurement – as taxpayers, don’t we deserve it?

    submit to reddit

    8 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Thateus
      Posted 30/03/2012 at 10:50 pm | Permalink |

      Why do you think they are seeking data centre providers in NSW? To drive further investment in NSW…

      Also – have you now forgiven him? (see http://delimiter.com.au/2012/02/06/former-us-govt-cio-in-aussie-speaking-tour/). Basically he quit before his plan was proven or disproven.

    2. Posted 30/03/2012 at 11:17 pm | Permalink |

      Yeah, another datacentre is just what we need.

      I’ll agree it’s been a while since I’ve set foot in either the Optus (Ultimo) or Equinex (Mascot) datacentres, but at the time both had quite a bit of floor space left for new installations. And as per the article with virtualisation you need less space, and of course the equipment itself is getting smaller and more powerful too.

      It would be pretty ridiculous to still be pressing ahead with this when there are already datacentres available that already have connections to all the major carriers.

      • Douglas
        Posted 03/04/2012 at 9:35 am | Permalink |

        Hi Tezz,
        Datacentre space is actually at a premium Australia wide. Especially high density floor space.
        UIDC (Optus Ultimo) is not a carrier neutral facility, so really is not suitable for Govt unless you are an Optus only shop, and don’t plan on changing. Also it is an old DC, and not well suited to high density blade chassis, as they have power and cooling limits.
        Equinix has recently opened it’s third SYD DC, which is filling rapidly, and Globalswitch Ultimo (the biggest of them all) is nearly at capacity (they are building another one).
        Yes, another DC is exactly what we need, and many people are building.
        As you say, it has obviously been a while since you last set foot in these DCs, because a lot has changed :)

        Regards,
        Douglas.

        • Posted 03/04/2012 at 10:18 am | Permalink |

          Ok, I’ll admit I was wrong about the demand for datacentres.

          However, if the demand for datacentre space is as high as you say it is, does this mean you support the government building it’s own datacentres? Or should this be left to the private sector?

          • Douglas
            Posted 03/04/2012 at 12:01 pm | Permalink |

            Hello Tezz,

            I think that Government’s should do what they do best. Building and running DCs is probably not their core area of expertise.

            Renai – I have some current, relavent direct experience in this area, and I would say that this statement:

            “The need for physical space is diminishing rapidly, with virtualisation and now cloud technology becoming more prevalent.”

            Could not be further from the truth. As you say, lots of companies are rushing to build space. They are not muppets. They are building space because demand is outstripping supply. Just look at NextDCs share price.

            Regards,
            Douglas.

    3. Jason
      Posted 01/04/2012 at 2:32 am | Permalink |

      The article may have a good point, but it does seem a little bias toward the very product the author makes a living from. Do we really want a government that jumps on to the latest tech trend that rears its head every 6 months. And with all the (real) fears of data being compromised by hackers, who wants to store anything other than photo’s and music in the cloud?

    4. Posted 01/04/2012 at 2:34 pm | Permalink |

      Good article. I agree the government is struggling to adapt but would add that cloud vendors need to address some key issues especially data ownership and reliability before government moves

    5. Thomas
      Posted 02/04/2012 at 9:06 pm | Permalink |

      From what I’ve heard storage space has become a major issue and some agencies are struggling to get increased capacity




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights