• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites


  • Renai's other site: Sci-fi + fantasy book news and reviews
  • RSS Renai LeMay

  • Gadgets, News - Written by on Monday, December 12, 2011 9:12 - 7 Comments

    Harvey Norman fined $1.25m for false advertising

    news The Federal Court in Brisbane has penalised retail giant Harvey Norman $1.25 million for misleading advertising, resulting from action by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).

    In her judgement, Justice Collier described Harvey Norman’s conduct as “seriously misleading and deceptive, on a significant and far-reaching scale.” The advertising involved promotion of the sale of 3D televisions in the ‘3D Finals Fever’ catalogue. The ACCC’s statement on the issue is available online here.

    The catalogue gave the false impression that consumers in all the places where it was distributed could buy and use a 3D television to watch the 2010 AFL and NRL grand finals in 3D format. However, the catalogue was distributed across Australia, including in places where there was no 3D broadcast of the football grand finals.

    In reality, the 3D broadcast was limited to metropolitan Brisbane, Sydney, Newcastle, Adelaide, Perth and Melbourne. The catalogue was distributed throughout Australia even after Harvey Norman realised that the 3D broadcast was limited. This means that the catalogue represented that the 3D televisions had benefits and uses they did not actually have.

    The Court also found that Harvey Norman had made misleading representations between October 2008 and July 2011 regarding the existence of particular conditions in its catalogue and website advertising.

    The published website content and the distributed catalogues both gave the evident impression that the advertised goods were generally available across Harvey Norman stores. Meanwhile conditions in fine print contradicted this notion: a provision in all catalogues stated that the offers in them were being made only by a single store in each State or Territory, even as a condition on the website stated that the offers published on the site were available only at one store in Australia.

    Summing up the nature and extent of Harvey Norman’s conduct, Collier stated that the facts painted “a picture of an expensive, misleading and calculated campaign of sizable proportions, characterised by blatant and deliberate disregard of the truth, cynical strategies to capitalise on contemporary sporting events (in the case of the 3D Conduct) and the contemptuous manipulation of the expectations of ordinary consumers in respect of so-called “fine print” (in relation to the catalogues).”

    Rod Sims, ACCC Chairman said that the conduct of Harvey Norman seemed to have been intended to reach as many Australian consumers across the country as possible, through various media including newspaper, internet and letterbox drop. “Retailers have a responsibility to ensure that accurate information is given to consumers about the uses and benefits of new and emerging technology, such as 3D television,” he asserted.

    Sims stated that Harvey Norman had known the facts and should have got it right; the Court agreed with this statement. He continued, “A headline representation cannot be contradicted or turned on its head by fine print conditions or requiring consumers to navigate through terms and conditions to discover the truth. Fine print is not an antidote to misleading or deceptive conduct.”

    Speaking about Harvey Norman’s compliance program, Collier said that the Court had inferred that this constituted another unfortunate example of a business paying mere lip service to a compliance policy. She suggested that the organisation’s compliance policy might perhaps be sadly inadequate.

    Justice Collier of the Federal Court made the following orders: Restraining Harvey Norman from engaging in similar conduct for a period of three years; requiring it to publish corrective notices in regional and metropolitan newspapers and on the Harvey Norman website; and requiring it to pay a contribution towards the ACCC’s costs.

    The ACCC said in its statement that Harvey Norman admitted that it had flouted the former Trade Practices Act 1974 and the Australian Consumer Law and agreed to the penalties and other orders sought from the Court. It does not appear as if the retailer has issued its own statement on the matter.

    Print Friendly

    7 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Dean
      Posted 12/12/2011 at 9:49 am | Permalink |

      It’s all the online retailer’s fault!

      • Posted 12/12/2011 at 9:53 am | Permalink |

        lol I’m just waiting for the Gerry Harvey response

        • Posted 12/12/2011 at 12:51 pm | Permalink |

          Don’t be surprised if the response, well okay puffery and spin, is only seen on Today Tonight.. You can’t buy the sort of publicity HN has been getting from them lately.

          Oh wait …

      • Gerry "No Interest" Harvey
        Posted 12/12/2011 at 1:37 pm | Permalink |

        $1.25m? looks like i’ll have to postpone the refit of my third yacht…

    2. Peter Piper
      Posted 12/12/2011 at 11:15 am | Permalink |

      sounds like they were being lazy and not wanting to make region specific advertising.

      • Clinton
        Posted 12/12/2011 at 3:24 pm | Permalink |

        a lazy HN staff member?
        surely you jest.

    3. Posted 13/12/2011 at 11:01 am | Permalink |

      Hn will get 1.25 mil worth of free advertising




  • Get our weekly newsletter

    All our stories, just one email a week.

    Email address:


    Follow us on social media






    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Legacy health software lands SA Govt in court doctor

      In which the South Australian Government comes up with complex legal arguments as to why it should be able to continue to use a 1980’s software package.

    • Microsoft wants to win you back with Windows 10 windows-10

      The latest version of Microsoft’s Windows operating system will begin rolling out from Wednesday (July 29). And remarkably, Windows 10 will be offered as a free upgrade to those users who already have Windows 7 and 8.1 installed.

    • Qld Govt Depts have no disaster recovery plan brisvegas2

      Two sizable Queensland Government departments have no central disaster recovery plan, the state’s Auditor-General has found, despite the region’s ongoing struggles with extreme weather conditions that have previously knocked out telecommunications and data centre infrastructure.

    • ASD releases Windows 8 hardening guide windows-8-1

      The Australian Signals Directorate appears to have released a guide to hardening Microsoft’s Windows 8 operating system, three years after the software was released for use by corporate customers, and as Microsoft is slated to release its next upgrade, Windows 10.

    • ASG picks up $35m CIMIC IT services deal money

      Perth-headquartered IT services group ASG this week revealed it had picked up a deal worth at least $35 million over five years with CIMIC Group — the massive construction and contracting group previously known as Leighton Holdings.

  • Blog, Policy + Politics - Jul 31, 2015 12:43 - 0 Comments

    Google ploughs $1m into Australian tech education

    More In Policy + Politics


    Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 31, 2015 14:16 - 1 Comment

    Legacy health software lands SA Govt in court

    More In Enterprise IT


    Industry, News - Jul 28, 2015 12:37 - 0 Comments

    ICAC to investigate NSW TAFE ICT manager

    More In Industry


    Consumer Tech, News - Jul 29, 2015 17:14 - 11 Comments

    Telstra integrates Netflix, Stan, Presto into re-badged Roku box

    More In Consumer Tech