• Catch issues early, fix them fast – Free trial


    [ad] With GFI Cloud you can easily manage and secure your remote workforce – wherever they are, from wherever you are! The simple IT management platform includes patch management, antivirus, web protection, monitoring and remote control. Get the benefit of endpoint protection with the ease of central management. Start a free trial now.


  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites


  • Blog, Featured, Gadgets - Written by on Wednesday, November 30, 2011 13:32 - 22 Comments

    Judge overturns Galaxy Tab sale ban

    blog Multiple media outlets are reporting this afternoon that the Federal Court of Australia has overturned Apple’s preliminary injunction against the sale of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 Android tablet in Australia. You can read the story on Reuters, iTNews, Gizmodo and other sites, but we like the version on ZDNet.com.au the best, because it details Apple’s next move:

    “In a surprise move, however, Apple legal counsel Stephen Burley SC then sought a stay of the orders handed down by Justice Foster so that an appeal against the overturning of the injunction could be heard before the High Court of Australia.”

    The High Court, eh? Is Samsung’s mediocre tablet really important enough to Cupertino that the company with more cash in the bank than the US Government is willing to tie up the highest court in Australia about the issue? It’s not like the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is in hot demand, after all — especially now that Motorola’s rival Xoom tablet is half price and the Kindle Fire costs just US$200. I think it’s time Apple took a chill pill.

    Image credit: Samsung

    submit to reddit

    22 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Level380
      Posted 30/11/2011 at 2:12 pm | Permalink |

      “really important enough to Cupertino that the company with more cash in the bank than the US Government is willing to tie up the highest court in Australia about the issue”

      Of course it is…. Apple shit doesn’t stink! So they don’t care what resources they waste, as long as they tie up the courts and samsung from selling the tablet till after xmas.

    2. Dean
      Posted 30/11/2011 at 2:33 pm | Permalink |

      Well, Jobs did say “I will spend every penny of Apple’s $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong. I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product. I’m willing to go thermonuclear war on this.”

      It’s funny, because until his biography came out, I had always assumed the litigiousness of Apple was mostly just lawyers being lawyers. But these quotes make it clear the directive came directly from Steve.

      [ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2051793/Steve-Jobs-vowed-destroy-iPhone-rival-Android-thermonuclear-war.html#ixzz1f9iWv66T ]

      • Level380
        Posted 30/11/2011 at 2:41 pm | Permalink |

        Oh its come from the top alright…. now that Steve has passed on, apple will seems more determined than ever to ‘do right be steve’ by going after android and samsung cause they ‘stole’ from apple.

        Apple has gone so far as to cutting samsung out of the newer products. Not a lot of people know, but samsung is the major supplier of chips in the iphone/ipad devices, including the screens, ram and they even make apples A4/A5 CPU.

        Its also unknown to a lot of people that Apple (aka Steve) was very good and reusing other peoples ideas. The iPod wasn’t his idea, Creative made the first portable MP3 player on the market. Apple ‘improved’ on it. The GUI interface was made by Xerox, apple ‘improved’ on it, the list of apples ‘improvements’ is long!

    3. Chris
      Posted 30/11/2011 at 2:34 pm | Permalink |

      I feel like Apple are shooting themselves in the foot here by giving Samsung so much publicity. I wonder how many people in Australia have had their awareness of tablet alternatives increased thanks to this lawsuit?

    4. Dean
      Posted 30/11/2011 at 2:45 pm | Permalink |

      Whoa, from the linked ZDnet article:

      DMavo, Kogan Technologies and Mobicity were originally importing the devices before Apple served a cease and desist order on all three. DMavo was the only tablet importer to refuse Apple’s order to stop importing the devices, labelling Apple’s demands as outrageous. According to DMavo, Apple’s demands also included a requirement that the company hand over all data on customers who had purchased one of the tablets from the importer.

      That last part is especially pretty shocking…

      • Level380
        Posted 30/11/2011 at 2:50 pm | Permalink |

        That last part is especially pretty shocking……. but I’m not shocked, this is apple. They are the biggest control freaks out there. Its all great as long as you stay within the apple walled garden! Once you look over the fence, your cut off!

        Steve was very hot or cold type of person…. your in the circle or out of the circle.

    5. R
      Posted 30/11/2011 at 2:56 pm | Permalink |

      It’s not just about the Galaxy Tab – this is about taking down Android, and to a greater extent, the mess of patents encumbering the mobile phone & tablet industries. For anyone who isn’t familiar with it, the only way to make a mobile phone these days is by cross licensing patents from all the big companies. Apple is a newcomer to this, and all of their patents are software or design patents, which aren’t valid in all jurisdictions (esp. the software patents). Add to this the granting of patents by the USTPO that should never have been granted due to obviousness and prior art (which Aus has to respect due to trade agreements), and you have a patent war just waiting to break out.
      Tablets are affected because they share a large amount of tech with phones – touch screen interfaces, OSs, 3G communications, etc.

    6. Adam
      Posted 30/11/2011 at 3:01 pm | Permalink |

      Common sense prevails.

    7. Simon Reidy
      Posted 30/11/2011 at 6:27 pm | Permalink |

      Its good to see Apple get shafted on this, and I say that as an owner of an iPhone 4 and iPad 2. I’m so sick of reading about ridiclous legal disputes over form factor, aesthetics or lines of code. Having said that I actually think there are some pretty obvious areas where Touchwiz resembles basic elements of iOS. But there’s also plenty of ideas that Apple have borrowed from Android and WebOS.

      Apple also blatantly stole ideas from the jailbreak app development scene to introduce in iOS5 (to the point where they even hired a jailbreak notification centre app developer to work for them). Then there’s the fact that there there may not have even be an App Store as we know it today without Jailbreaking, as “Installer” was the first way to install 3rd party apps on the iPhone (at the time Jobs was pushing web apps as the way forward!).

      With a top-end profuct refresh cycle of roughly 6 months for Android and about a year for iOS, it’s hardly surprising that all OS developers borrow many of the best and most successful ideas to implement in a different way themselves in their OS.

      Apple are often intuitive and unique, and at other times they’ll simoly use existing technology and implement it in a new user friendly way, then market the hell ou of it. It’s a strategy that seems to work very well for them!

      Anyway even though its good to see a positive outcome for Samsung and Aussie consumers, is the Galaxy tab 10.1 even relevant any more? It was the hottest Android around at the time of the injunction, but some pretty awesome Terra 3 ICS tablets are starting to be leaked with CES only a couple of weeks away.

      The main thing is this is a win for Samsung for future Galaxy tabs (providing of course that Apple’s case is thrown out of the high court) but as mentioned in the article, there’s quite a few early Honeycomb tablets in the bargain bin as it is, so I’m looking forward o seeing what’s next from Samsung.

      • Level380
        Posted 30/11/2011 at 7:31 pm | Permalink |

        *Cough* the notifications system looks a hell of a lot like the one android has had since 1.0…….. But thats ok for apple to steal, I mean its all ‘free for all’, but to hell for you if you dare steal or copy from apple!

        • Simon Reidy
          Posted 01/12/2011 at 8:12 pm | Permalink |

          Apple are just as guilty of stealing ideas from competitors as Samsung or Google. No doubt about it. But let’s not forget there would have been no touchscreen smartphone and tablet revolution (at least not at the dramatic exponential rate we’ve seen since 2007) if the iPhone\iPad and subseqeuent App Store hadn’t been released. Google and Microsoft have been playing catch-up ever since.

          As far as notifications go, its well known that Apple copied jailbreak notification app developers far more so than they did Android’s notification bar. Just google “Notified Pro” or “LockInfo” and lastly, the most similar of all is an app called “MobileNotifier” (shortly after it’s release, the developer, Peter Hajas, announced he had been hired by Apple and would be shutting down the project). Personally I’ve been using LockInfo since iOS 3 and with it’s frequent updates and multiple plugins its still a superior experience to Apple’s notification system.

          Were jailbreak developers copying Android when implementing the pull-down notification bar? Probably! But if you look at WebOS notifications they also copied some ideas from Palm. The point is that the art of creation often involves copying bits and pieces of ideas from other people, and releasing them as something new of your own. A good analogy is to look at many of the great artists from the last few hundred years who are known to have emulated styles of painters they learnt from or were inspired by.

          However there’s no denying Apple’s real attempt with these law suits against Samsung is to go after Android itself in a big way. It’s great they’ve lost for now, because a successful block of the Galaxy 10.1 probably would have opened the doors to sue other Android manufacturers elsewhere in the world for stealing Apple’s precious ideas.

          I personally don’t understand why Apple are so strict, even paranoid, about protecting their patents, when they are already the clear market leader of smartphones and tablets by a massive margin. It makes them look petty and insecure. Not a good look.

          On a final note, I feel I have to rant about stupid generalised iFanboy and Fandroid comments here (and to be fair, on pretty much every other tech site on the net). It’s such a black and white perspective of technology. It’s obvious both OS’s have many awesome features and if people can’t acknowledge that, I generally assume they are 13 or younger, or someone that can’t read between the lines. A blind hatred for Apple, or the notion that all Apple fans are “iSheep” that don’t research their purchase is quite frankly a stupid myth. While Apple obviously has its its fair share of crazy fans that will buy anything with an Apple badge, they make up a very small fraction of users, and you can bet that Google has a similar percentage of extreme fanatics wearing their green robot t-shirts with pride. The majority of tech-heads I know with Apple products are well aware of Android and Windows Phone 7 and the pros and cons of them all. Most of them chose iOS because it has a better selection of apps (particularly games) and delivers a simple, but fast and polished experience, which is now synced across all their devices with iCloud.

    8. Posted 30/11/2011 at 7:41 pm | Permalink |

      Thankfully you didn’t say they need to take an iChill pill since they have most likely copyrighted, trademarked and panted the process already. and you wouldn’t want to go to be sent to iCourt(tm) now would you?

      ;)

    9. Matthew
      Posted 30/11/2011 at 9:16 pm | Permalink |

      Mediocre? I’d hardly call the Galaxy Tab 10.1 a ‘mediocre’ device, given the technology that’s gone into it (not to mention rave reviews). I’d also be hard-pressed to say that it’s not in demand, because the UK retailers that I deal with for these sorts of things are selling out of them on a fairly regular basis. In fact, I’m presently waiting on one of them to get a 64GB Galaxy Tab 10.1 in stock for me.

      • Posted 30/11/2011 at 9:31 pm | Permalink |

        Interesting. What makes you say that Matthew? The Xoom also got pretty good reviews, but I’ve played with both it and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and I didn’t see a lot of difference between the two. The Xoom has been selling so well that retailers have cut its price by half to get rid of the stock …

        • Matthew
          Posted 30/11/2011 at 9:40 pm | Permalink |

          I remember tossing up between the Xoom and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 a few weeks ago, when I was trying to decide what tablet I’d like to buy. The primary reason I went for the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is because of a comparison between the screens. The screen on the Xoom isn’t as clear as the screen on the Tab in some lighting conditions. For me, that’s a fairly important point considering that the whole idea of a tablet is the readability and quality of its screen.

          Also, while I realise that it’s a marginal difference between the two, the Tab does have a larger capacity battery and therefore probably a better battery life. A HUGE plus in my view, because there’s nothing I hate more than running out of juice when I want to do something with an electronic device.

          As for the sales of both devices, didn’t the Xoom have a fairly protracted period of lacklustre sales when it was first released? My understanding is that the reason why the Xoom is so cheap now is because it wasn’t selling as well as the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is, so Motorola had to make it more price-competitive.

          I’m not saying the Xoom isn’t a great tablet, because it absolutely is. But so is the Galaxy Tab 10.1, and it’s a bit unfair to label it as ‘mediocre’ based on superficial observations of price.

        • Level380
          Posted 30/11/2011 at 9:47 pm | Permalink |

          Stock has been reduced as the Xoom 2 is about to be released. Its standard practice, drop the price to clear out the old stock.

          http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/29/motorola-xoom-2-unboxing-and-first-impressions-video/

    10. Posted 01/12/2011 at 9:03 am | Permalink |

      I doubt that Apple never copied anyone.
      Apple created the first monitor in 1980 and that looks, a lot ,like a TV!
      What about the voice recognition? They are trying to make the people to believe it is from their invention.
      It is not!, they have improved the system for voice recognition, in other words they have copied the voice recognition and modified it. aren’t they?

      cheers
      Jc

      • Level380
        Posted 01/12/2011 at 9:10 am | Permalink |

        Apple doesn’t copy, it steals and ‘improves’, passing it off as brand new feature, that the iSheep lap up!

        Do you know how many iPhone users don’t know that the iOS5 notifications system is a direct copy of the 3 year old android notification system? Not many!

    11. Marlon
      Posted 01/12/2011 at 5:01 pm | Permalink |

      Well, Kogan have wasted no time getting the tablet up on their website
      http://www.kogan.com.au/shop/category/android-tablets/

      • Posted 01/12/2011 at 7:07 pm | Permalink |

        I told them about the ban lift to see if I could get a price from them.
        Next thing I know is an email from them with a link to their new updated media table page featuring the galaxy.




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds — AustralianSuper, CBus, HESTA and more — is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, as was revealed in November, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well, and the Financial Review last week reported that Superpartners is actually close to turfing it altogether and going back to the drawing board.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights