• Enjoy the freedom to innovate and grow your business


    [ad] With Microsoft Azure you have hybrid cloud flexibility, allowing your platform to span your cloud and on premise data centre. Learn more at microsoftcloud.com.

  • IT Admin: No Time to Save Time?


    [ad] Do you spend too much time patching machines or cleaning up after virus attacks? With automation controlled from a central IT management console accessible anytime, anywhere – you can save time for bigger tasks. Try simple IT management from GFI Cloud and start saving time today!

  • Free Forrester analysis of CRM solutions


    [ad] In this 25 page report, independent analyst house Forrester evaluates 18 significant products in the customer relationship management space from a broad range of vendors, detailing its findings on how CRM suites measure up and plotting where they stand in relation to each other. Download it for free now.

  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites


  • Reader giveaway: Google Nexus 5


    We’re big fans of Google’s Nexus line-up in general at Delimiter towers. Nexus 4, Nexus 7, Nexus 10 … we love pretty much anything Nexus. Because of this we've kicked off a new competition to give away one of Google’s new Nexus 5 smartphones to a lucky reader. Click here to enter.

  • Featured, Gadgets - Written by on Monday, October 17, 2011 16:27 - 12 Comments

    Samsung files suit to block Aussie iPhone 4S sales

    news Korean electronics giant Samsung today asked courts in Australia and Japan to block the sale of Apple’s latest iPhone 4S handset in the two countries, as part of ongoing legal action between the pair.

    “Samsung Electronics today filed preliminary injunction motions in the Tokyo District Court, Japan and in the New South Wales Registry, Australia requesting the courts to stop the sale of Apple’s iPhone 4S in the respective countries,” the company said in a statement this afternoon.

    “In a separate filing today, Samsung has appealed the Australian court’s decision on October 13 to grant a preliminary injunction over the GALAXY Tab 10.1.” In Japan, Samsung is also seeking an injunction to immediately bar the sale of iPhone 4 and iPad 2.

    According to the company’s statement, its preliminary injunction request in Australia cites three patent infringements relating to wireless telecommunications standards, specifically Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) and HSPA. The injunction request in Japan, according to the company, cites infringements on one HSPA-related patent and three user interface patents.

    “In light of these violations, Samsung believes the sale of such Apple devices should be injuncted,” Samsung said. “Apple has continued to violate our patent rights and free ride on our technology. We will steadfastly protect our intellectual property.”

    The news comes just days after the launch on Friday morning of the iPhone 4S locally to great fanfare, with Australian telcos citing high levels of demand for Apple’s latest handset and still in the midst of shipping orders to customers located around the nation who had pre-ordered the device.

    It represents the latest round in legal wrangling between the pair, kicked off internationally by Apple, which believes Samsung’s Galaxy S smartphones and Galaxy Tab tablets infringe its patents and are too similar in design to Apple’s iPhone and iPad lines. Last week, Apple won a temporary injunction against Samsung selling in Australia its iPad rival tablet, the Galaxy Tab 10.1, until the legal wrangling over patents between the pair is resolved. Samsung has also filed a countersuit against Apple on patent matters in Australia.

    Today’s news follows a months’ worth of speculation that Samsung could attempt to block sales of the iPhone 4S in a number of jurisdictions around the globe. On September 21 European financial newspaper The Financial Times reported that Samsung was considering legal action to block sales of the handset either in Europe or South Korea. At the time, the company had already filed a motion to block sales of Apple’s existing iPhones in the Netherlands.

    In both countries, Apple has already been successful in blocking some Samsung products from being sold (the Galaxy S series of devices in the Netherlands, and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia), and in both countries, Samsung is retaliating with lawsuits based on its control of patents allegedly used by Apple for 3G access in its devices.

    However, German-based patent commentator Florian Müller — a frequent analyst of the Samsung/Apple situation — does not believe Samsung will be successful in its legal attack in Australia.

    “I believe Samsung’s attack on the iPhone 4S in Australia is doomed to fail because it relates to three patents declared essential to the 3G telecommunications standard,” Müller wrote this afternoon on his blog. “On Friday, a Dutch judge already made it clear that Samsung can’t seek an injunction based on such patents, and I’d be extremely surprised if an Australian judge took a different perspective on FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) licensing commitments.”

    “The odds are very long against Samsung overcoming all of Apple’s defenses.”

    submit to reddit

    12 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Posted 17/10/2011 at 4:34 pm | Permalink |

      You know what I love about the systems like we live in? These test cases help make law, and soon I hope that means most of this patent crap has a higher bar on the grant process.
      Because right now they are nothing but barriers to entry for any business. It’s nice that Apple and Samsung can get out the lawyers, but how many smaller companies are either afraid to do stuff because of patent uncertainty or are to easily smacked down by the big boys because they can’t afford to defend themselves.
      I couldn’t imagine doing a business case in a product I release which includes a 10 or even 25% risk factor just in case of legal costs of dealing with potential patents – either during development or after launch

      • PeterA
        Posted 18/10/2011 at 8:49 am | Permalink |

        25% is probably lowballing it in the IT sector. Happily you usually only get sued if you are any good (have cash), or the group suing you *THINK* you have cash.

    2. Posted 17/10/2011 at 4:36 pm | Permalink |

      This lawsuit had been looking quite likely a few weeks back. Our article at the time:

      http://delimiter.com.au/2011/09/24/will-samsung-try-to-block-iphone-5-sales-in-australia/

    3. Posted 17/10/2011 at 4:42 pm | Permalink |

      The case can be followed @ https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/NSD1792/2011/actions

    4. Posted 17/10/2011 at 7:32 pm | Permalink |

      I will be very surprised if the courts disallow this and if they do it shows that equity is not happening since Samsung have a very similar (if not better) case than Apple on this.

      These sort of cross-suits against Apple should be from now on named the “iKarma effect”

      • RobinP
        Posted 17/10/2011 at 7:59 pm | Permalink |

        Why does Samsung have a similar or better case than Apple? The Samsung patents are all FRAND patents – so even if Apple loose they pay a standard License fee and walk away with barely a bruise.

        Apples patents are NOT FRAND – and so Apple is well within their rights to say “No, you can’t use them”.

        • Posted 17/10/2011 at 8:50 pm | Permalink |

          Exactly the Samsung claim is based on real undisputed patents, not on obviousness, prior art nor generic art… therefore Samsung has a better claim that Apple are breaching patent rights by not paying royalties and/or licensing. There is no law that states Apple can then say.. Oh our bad heres the money we wont do it again, and then not have to pay restitution for any harm.

          Basically Apple should stop selling the iPhone 4S until such time that a court designates an equitable settlement. This is what is called Equity

        • PeterA
          Posted 18/10/2011 at 8:42 am | Permalink |

          Just because they are FRAND doesn’t mean you can make stuff without licensing them.

          Apple are selling stuff without a license, so is Samsung. It just happens that Samsungs patents are in a pool which is easier (theoretically) to license. And Apple still haven’t done that.

          I think that makes it worse if anything.

    5. Marlon
      Posted 18/10/2011 at 1:37 pm | Permalink |

      Hey Renai, what happened to the ‘opinion’ section you used to peg at the end of your articles? Seems to have gone missing recently. That’s one of the things I love about Delimiter!

      • Posted 18/10/2011 at 2:55 pm | Permalink |

        hey Marlon,

        I only append it when I feel there’s a need to add some context into the story. Over the past few days there hasn’t been enough of that needed so I’ve rarely added it in. But it hasn’t gone away ;)

        Renai

        • Anonymous
          Posted 18/10/2011 at 4:11 pm | Permalink |

          I thought your editor was gagging you again

          • Posted 18/10/2011 at 5:00 pm | Permalink |

            Nah I’ve got him under control — I threatened to cut off his whiskey drip while he was asleep under the desk.




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content


  • Six smart secrets for nurturing customer relationships
    [ad] Today, we are experiencing a world where behind every app, every device, and every connection, is a customer. Your customers will demand you to be where they and managing customer relationship is the key to your business’s growth. The question is where do you start? Click here to download six free whitepapers to help you connect with your customers in a whole new way.
  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Greens claim NSW LMBR project turning into a disaster sydney

      The NSW Greens late last week claimed to have obtained documents showing that the NSW Department of Education and Communities’ wide-ranging Learning Management and Business Reform program, which involves a number of rolling upgrades of business administration software, was deployed before it was ready, with “appalling consequences for administrative staff, principals, teachers and students”.

    • NSW Govt trials inter-truck safety devices trucks-cohda

      The New South Wales Government has inked a contract with connected vehicle technology supplier Cohda Wireless, as part of a trial of so-called Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS) which allow heavy vehicles to communicate directly with each other about their position on the road to help reduce road accidents.

    • Victoria finally kills $180m Ultranet disaster thumbsdown1

      The Victorian Government has reportedly terminated its disastrous Ultranet schools portal, which ballooned in cost to $180 million over the past seven years but ended up being barely used by the education stakeholders it was supposed to serve.

    • NetSuite in whole of business TurboSmart deal turbosmart

      Business-focused software as a service giant NetSuite has unveiled yet another win with a mid-sized Australian company, revealing a deal with automotive performance products manufacturer Turbosmart that has seen the company deploy a comprehensive suite of NetSuite products across its business.

    • WA Health told: Hire a goddamn CIO already doctor

      A state parliamentary committee has told Western Australia’s Department of Health to end four years of acting appointments and hire a permanent CIO, in the wake of news that the lack of such an executive role in the department contributed directly to the fiasco at the state’s new Fiona Stanley Hospital, much of which has revolved around poorly delivered IT systems.

    • Former whole of Qld Govt CIO Grant resigns petergrant

      High-flying IT executive Peter Grant has left his senior position in the Queensland State Government, a year after the state demoted him from the whole of government chief information officer role he had held for the second time.

    • Hills dumped $18m ERP/CRM rollout for Salesforce.com hills

      According to a blog post published by Salesforce.com today, one of Ted Pretty’s first moves upon taking up managing director role at iconic Australian brand Hills in 2012 was to halt an expensive traditional business software project and call Salesforce.com instead.

    • Dropbox opens Sydney office koalabox

      Cloud computing storage player Dropbox has announced it is opening an office in Sydney, as competition in the local enterprise cloud storage market accelerates.

    • Heartbleed, internal outages: CBA’s horror 24 hours commbankatm

      The Commonwealth Bank’s IT division has suffered something of a nightmare 24 hours, with a catastrophic internal IT outage taking down multiple systems and resulting in physical branches being offline, and the bank separately suffering public opprobrium stemming from contradictory statements it made with respect to potential vulnerabilities stemming from the Heartbleed OpenSSL bug.

    • Android in the enterprise: Three Aussie examples from Samsung androidapple

      Forget iOS and Windows. Today we present three decently sized deployments of Android in the Australian market on Samsung’s hardware, which the Korean vendor has dug up from its archives over the past several years for us after a little prompting :)

  • Enterprise IT, News - Apr 23, 2014 15:58 - 4 Comments

    Greens claim NSW LMBR project turning into a disaster

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Apr 24, 2014 14:00 - 11 Comments

    iiNet to splurge $350m on content, media

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry - Apr 24, 2014 16:05 - 0 Comments

    Free to fail: Why corporates are learning to love venture capital

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Apr 23, 2014 12:57 - 32 Comments

    Cinema execs blame piracy for $20 ticket prices

    More In Digital Rights