• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Featured, Gadgets - Written by on Monday, October 17, 2011 16:27 - 12 Comments

    Samsung files suit to block Aussie iPhone 4S sales

    news Korean electronics giant Samsung today asked courts in Australia and Japan to block the sale of Apple’s latest iPhone 4S handset in the two countries, as part of ongoing legal action between the pair.

    “Samsung Electronics today filed preliminary injunction motions in the Tokyo District Court, Japan and in the New South Wales Registry, Australia requesting the courts to stop the sale of Apple’s iPhone 4S in the respective countries,” the company said in a statement this afternoon.

    “In a separate filing today, Samsung has appealed the Australian court’s decision on October 13 to grant a preliminary injunction over the GALAXY Tab 10.1.” In Japan, Samsung is also seeking an injunction to immediately bar the sale of iPhone 4 and iPad 2.

    According to the company’s statement, its preliminary injunction request in Australia cites three patent infringements relating to wireless telecommunications standards, specifically Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) and HSPA. The injunction request in Japan, according to the company, cites infringements on one HSPA-related patent and three user interface patents.

    “In light of these violations, Samsung believes the sale of such Apple devices should be injuncted,” Samsung said. “Apple has continued to violate our patent rights and free ride on our technology. We will steadfastly protect our intellectual property.”

    The news comes just days after the launch on Friday morning of the iPhone 4S locally to great fanfare, with Australian telcos citing high levels of demand for Apple’s latest handset and still in the midst of shipping orders to customers located around the nation who had pre-ordered the device.

    It represents the latest round in legal wrangling between the pair, kicked off internationally by Apple, which believes Samsung’s Galaxy S smartphones and Galaxy Tab tablets infringe its patents and are too similar in design to Apple’s iPhone and iPad lines. Last week, Apple won a temporary injunction against Samsung selling in Australia its iPad rival tablet, the Galaxy Tab 10.1, until the legal wrangling over patents between the pair is resolved. Samsung has also filed a countersuit against Apple on patent matters in Australia.

    Today’s news follows a months’ worth of speculation that Samsung could attempt to block sales of the iPhone 4S in a number of jurisdictions around the globe. On September 21 European financial newspaper The Financial Times reported that Samsung was considering legal action to block sales of the handset either in Europe or South Korea. At the time, the company had already filed a motion to block sales of Apple’s existing iPhones in the Netherlands.

    In both countries, Apple has already been successful in blocking some Samsung products from being sold (the Galaxy S series of devices in the Netherlands, and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia), and in both countries, Samsung is retaliating with lawsuits based on its control of patents allegedly used by Apple for 3G access in its devices.

    However, German-based patent commentator Florian Müller — a frequent analyst of the Samsung/Apple situation — does not believe Samsung will be successful in its legal attack in Australia.

    “I believe Samsung’s attack on the iPhone 4S in Australia is doomed to fail because it relates to three patents declared essential to the 3G telecommunications standard,” Müller wrote this afternoon on his blog. “On Friday, a Dutch judge already made it clear that Samsung can’t seek an injunction based on such patents, and I’d be extremely surprised if an Australian judge took a different perspective on FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) licensing commitments.”

    “The odds are very long against Samsung overcoming all of Apple’s defenses.”

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Posted 17/10/2011 at 4:34 pm | Permalink | Reply

      You know what I love about the systems like we live in? These test cases help make law, and soon I hope that means most of this patent crap has a higher bar on the grant process.
      Because right now they are nothing but barriers to entry for any business. It’s nice that Apple and Samsung can get out the lawyers, but how many smaller companies are either afraid to do stuff because of patent uncertainty or are to easily smacked down by the big boys because they can’t afford to defend themselves.
      I couldn’t imagine doing a business case in a product I release which includes a 10 or even 25% risk factor just in case of legal costs of dealing with potential patents – either during development or after launch

      • PeterA
        Posted 18/10/2011 at 8:49 am | Permalink | Reply

        25% is probably lowballing it in the IT sector. Happily you usually only get sued if you are any good (have cash), or the group suing you *THINK* you have cash.

    2. Posted 17/10/2011 at 4:36 pm | Permalink | Reply

      This lawsuit had been looking quite likely a few weeks back. Our article at the time:


    3. Posted 17/10/2011 at 4:42 pm | Permalink | Reply

      The case can be followed @ https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/NSD1792/2011/actions

    4. Posted 17/10/2011 at 7:32 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I will be very surprised if the courts disallow this and if they do it shows that equity is not happening since Samsung have a very similar (if not better) case than Apple on this.

      These sort of cross-suits against Apple should be from now on named the “iKarma effect”

      • RobinP
        Posted 17/10/2011 at 7:59 pm | Permalink | Reply

        Why does Samsung have a similar or better case than Apple? The Samsung patents are all FRAND patents – so even if Apple loose they pay a standard License fee and walk away with barely a bruise.

        Apples patents are NOT FRAND – and so Apple is well within their rights to say “No, you can’t use them”.

        • Posted 17/10/2011 at 8:50 pm | Permalink | Reply

          Exactly the Samsung claim is based on real undisputed patents, not on obviousness, prior art nor generic art… therefore Samsung has a better claim that Apple are breaching patent rights by not paying royalties and/or licensing. There is no law that states Apple can then say.. Oh our bad heres the money we wont do it again, and then not have to pay restitution for any harm.

          Basically Apple should stop selling the iPhone 4S until such time that a court designates an equitable settlement. This is what is called Equity

        • PeterA
          Posted 18/10/2011 at 8:42 am | Permalink | Reply

          Just because they are FRAND doesn’t mean you can make stuff without licensing them.

          Apple are selling stuff without a license, so is Samsung. It just happens that Samsungs patents are in a pool which is easier (theoretically) to license. And Apple still haven’t done that.

          I think that makes it worse if anything.

    5. Marlon
      Posted 18/10/2011 at 1:37 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Hey Renai, what happened to the ‘opinion’ section you used to peg at the end of your articles? Seems to have gone missing recently. That’s one of the things I love about Delimiter!

      • Posted 18/10/2011 at 2:55 pm | Permalink | Reply

        hey Marlon,

        I only append it when I feel there’s a need to add some context into the story. Over the past few days there hasn’t been enough of that needed so I’ve rarely added it in. But it hasn’t gone away ;)


        • Anonymous
          Posted 18/10/2011 at 4:11 pm | Permalink | Reply

          I thought your editor was gagging you again

          • Posted 18/10/2011 at 5:00 pm | Permalink | Reply

            Nah I’ve got him under control — I threatened to cut off his whiskey drip while he was asleep under the desk.

    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights