• Catch issues early, fix them fast – Free trial


    [ad] With GFI Cloud you can easily manage and secure your remote workforce – wherever they are, from wherever you are! The simple IT management platform includes patch management, antivirus, web protection, monitoring and remote control. Get the benefit of endpoint protection with the ease of central management. Start a free trial now.


  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • Sponsored Posts - Written by on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:17 - 8 Comments

    Hey! SaaS! Get off of our cloud! [Sponsored Post]

    This article is a sponsored post from our partner Ninefold. Please check out the company’s cloud computing and storage-as-a-service solutions at its web site.

    sponsored post Rolling Stones misquotes aside, I think it’s time Software as a Service (SaaS) was politely asked to step off the cloud bandwagon and stop confusing everyone. As if many of us didn’t have enough problems trying to help everyone else understand the concept of cloud computing – while shaking off the ‘slightly odd, socially-awkward geek’ tag that dogs IT – last month saw the launch of Cloud Girlfriend. Yet another SaaS service that manages to perpetuate not one but two unfortunate myths.

    Yes, you too can avoid the embarrassment of never getting a date, while showing off a hot girlfriend to all your old high school mates you should never have invited on Facebook. That’s right – you know they were all sniggering at you in their well balanced married-and-mortgaged-with-two-kids lifestyles while your Twitter stream was filled with your World of Warcraft adventures. (“My level sixty dwarf just got wiped by a level ten troll #WTF?”)

    Well, that would be the case if we were all basement-dwelling geeks with egg stains on our Iron Maiden t-shirts. But some of us don’t actually have a problem finding a real girlfriend. (It is sadly noted that it seemingly wasn’t deemed necessary to release a ‘Cloud Boyfriend’ alternative. Welcome to 1995.)

    Cloud Girlfriend allows you to create your ideal digital sweetheart and then interact with her through your chosen social network. Your friends will see you having conversations with your faux beau, and will even see photos of her, as you lead a fictional long-distance relationship. She will post adoring tweets for you or loving messages on your Facebook wall for all to see. But her entire personality and existence is stored virtually in ‘the cloud’ – apparently. However, the strings to your virtual admirer are pulled by ‘a real girl’ according to founder David Fuhriman on Quora.

    So, not really very virtual then. It isn’t made clear how much of the service is automated and virtual, and how much is really just people creating and interacting with fake accounts on your behalf.

    Of course, it’s entirely possible Cloud Girlfriend breaches Facebook and Twitter terms and conditions, which may make this a pretty short-run business. It’s almost as if the major social networks had enough foresight to prevent deceptive manipulation of their platforms. Who’d a thunk?

    So far, so very silly and mildly amusing in a sad ’what will they think of next’ kind of way. But my issue with Cloud Girlfriend is not merely that it’s just – well – creepy.

    Is this really the best illustration of the cloud? Is it really deserving of putting the C word (not that one – the clean one!) in its name? Last week, JP Morgenthal over at Cloud Computing Journal explored the common practice of using Facebook and other popular SaaS offerings to illustrate the concept of cloud computing to non users.

    “Software-as-a-Service is merely a consumer of cloud computing and not a component of cloud computing. Or, as we like to say in the architecture world, SaaS uses cloud, not SaaS is a cloud. Hence, the Facebook application is not cloud.”

    I happen to agree. Using Facebook to define the cloud is like using your television to define electricity. Although your television plugs into your wall socket, you can’t point at it and say “See that? That’s electricity, that is.” And in his wildest moments, Logie Baird never once considered calling his invention the ‘Electricity Screen’ to capitalise on all that electric hype.

    Using SaaS to define the cloud is lazy. It’s a small, inaccurate answer to a bigger question deserving of accuracy. And it only creates more questions later that can bring you embarrassingly unstuck – just like a digital girlfriend.

    In conjunction with Delimiter, we’re running a competition on this issue. To enter, simply tell us in 25 words or less how you would define cloud computing to your kids or grandparents and you could win a Ninefold prize pack; including an iPod Nano, a Ninefold t-shirt and $100 Ninefold credit. Don’t take it too seriously – silly and entertaining entries are encouraged. Entries close April 30.

    submit to reddit

    8 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Chad
      Posted 12/04/2011 at 11:09 am | Permalink |

      The biggest abuser of this term is Salesforce IMO.

      • Posted 12/04/2011 at 11:14 am | Permalink |

        Truly — Salesforce.com often describes everything as ‘cloud computing’. They do have some cloud computing offerings, though — but most of their stuff is actually software as a service.

    2. AM
      Posted 12/04/2011 at 1:42 pm | Permalink |

      What’s that skippy….. opportunity for partially informed rant.

      [begin inflammatory rhetoric]
      Let’s take this article at face value and eliminate SaaS from our Cloud lexicon. That leaves us with PaaS and IaaS. In PaaS we have MS, Google(kind of), Salesforce and arguably Facebook [challenge please???]. What we don’t have in this space is much hype/attention/interest.

      That leaves the vast majority of attention these days on the IaaS model. What is IaaS? Outsourced servers. And how long has that model been around? A very long time. Locally IBM GSA has been doing it for well over a decade or more. So why is it different today? The answer to that is price. Improvements in technology such as multi-core, virtualisation, metering and segmented storage have brought economies of scale to the vendor’s infrastructure and dramatically lowered the price to the customer.

      So now the old outsourced server model of one box for one customer and one service is dead and vendors can now deliver an attractive business proposition. Happy news, but hardly exciting. Entering the marketing teams. Yup the same guys who gave us “Web2.0” are back on the case telling us about the brand new “Cloud”.

      And oh how we listened.

      Now my beef here is not with IaaS providers, who by and large offer excellent services at amazing prices. Customers do win out of this.

      My beef is with “Cloud”.
      A new coat of paint, slapped on an old idea and beaten into C-Levels on a global scale.

      The problem is, its now reached a critical mass, where if you don’t use the term, you’re seen as behind the times. That sucker is now self-fulfilling.

      It’s like the Rebecca Black of the IT world.
      What….was that the line whizzing past me???

      Yup.

      [end inflammatory rhetoric]

      I had a bit of fun writing this.
      I hope it’s not taken toooo seriously.
      No doubt Renai will move/delete/kickban if I’ve really crossed a line in a sponsored post.

      [Glup]

      To finish up though, I’d say that Cloud services are of intense professional and personal interest to me right now and I truly welcome informed de-bunking of any spurious claims in the name of my education on the topic.

      A.

      • Posted 13/04/2011 at 9:03 am | Permalink |

        Ah, but it’s a rant I’m particularly familiar with and largely agree with. ‘Cloud’ as a term has become overladen with marketing baggage (see my various blog posts passim). But, as you say, it has become a double-edged sword in the nomenclature of virtualised technologies.

        In fact, there was a short period when creating the Ninefold brand that we toyed with avoiding the C-word altogether – opting for pure descriptions of virtual servers and virtual storage, etc. But, sadly, the necessity of matching our language to the key search terms of our customers meant we had to drop the idea in favour of actually attracting customers.

        This is the tug-of-war challenge that will eventually define the term – the tension between customer usage and marketing usage.

        I would challenge Facebook as even a PaaS as my understanding is they still operate from a traditional data centre model, not a virtualised one. In fact, I would challenge any definition of cloud that doesn’t involve virtualisation as, increasingly, that is where the definition seems to be moving amongst those ‘in the know’ (IT customer usage) – even if the wider non-technical market is still confused by the whole shebang.

        However, SaaS completely muddies the already murky waters.

        • AM
          Posted 13/04/2011 at 9:41 am | Permalink |

          Bravo for even considering removing the C word.

          It would have been incredibly ballsy and probably commercially suicidal.

          I genuinely believe that this technology will lead to a generational change in IT. The high cost of infrastructure has been a barrier to entry and inhibited the scalability of much of IT; particularly in web based B2C services and applications.

          Ironically todays start-ups are at a massive advantage over established players who are encumbered with product tied to their own data centre and hardware. Build a well-structured app, packaged for cloud deployment and cookie cutter it into wherever your customers happen to be. By the way, here is our service and support fee…. cha-ching.

          Once again I’m over simplifying things, but not by much.

          • AM
            Posted 13/04/2011 at 9:46 am | Permalink |

            Wait a sec….did I just describe SaaS?

            Ok, now my head hurts and I’m confused again.

      • Posted 13/04/2011 at 9:08 am | Permalink |

        Heh good rant!

    3. Posted 29/04/2011 at 2:15 pm | Permalink |

      Yes good rant, even if I’m bit late catching up with it. I hope my Twitter buddy Kimota doesn’t mind me saying that while he is on the ball with his analysis I his objective is never going to be achieved. Having a business which helps software companies understand and implement the *business* of SaaS I tried to hold out on the same argument with my staff up until last Q 2010. By then they convinced me I was showing my age and losing the battle against the simplicity of the catch-all cloud and the hype and marketing.

      So we now label things we do as cloud, yet we actually help people with the business of SaaS!

      Personally, while I appreciate the details, I think that Facebook is a great example of “cloud”. It’s far better than “Hotmail” or “Gmail” or “Dropbox”. As to whether cloud is simply IaaS and that is simply “servers for hire” – I don’t think that’s the case at all. It’s a very common argument that this is all old stuff rebranded. It’s not, and making that mistake could put you out of business or your job. But I’m also not totally convinced by the “if it’s not virtual it’s not cloud” argument – that would not only rule out Facebook but all of Google’s apps – are none of those worthy to be called cloud?

      I think there is a reasonable argument that a huge cloud data centre running a single instance e.g. Facebook, is not cloud. Because of the single instance. But how many people really want to care about this? Few. For now it’s cloud and make the most of it as you will.

      Walter @adamson




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds — AustralianSuper, CBus, HESTA and more — is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, as was revealed in November, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well, and the Financial Review last week reported that Superpartners is actually close to turfing it altogether and going back to the drawing board.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights