• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • News - Written by on Monday, February 14, 2011 13:25 - 12 Comments

    Caliburn rubber-stamps NBN business case

    Corporate advisory firm Greenhill Caliburn has delivered a positive appraisal of NBN Co’s business case in a report published this morning by the Federal Government, with the firm labelling the broadband company’s assumptions of its future operations as “reasonable”.

    Following the delivery of NBN Co’s corporate plan last year and publication, the Government had asked Greenhill Caliburn to review NBN Co’s Corporate Plan and provide a commercial assessment which would identify and analyse its key assumptions and potential risks.

    The plan covers a wide range of matters from projected pricing, to how much NBN Co will charge retail service providers to provide broadband services over its network, how much government capital it will require ($27.5 billion), when it will seek additional investment from the private sector (2015) and the network construction schedule for the fibre, wireless and satellite rollouts that will constitute the NBN.

    In a nine page executive summary of its report published this morning by Communications Minister Stephen Conroy online, the advisory firm appeared to be cautiously positive about NBN Co’s plan.

    “Greenhill Caliburn has reviewed the corporate plan and relevant supporting documentation provided to us,” the firm wrote. “Based upon our review, we believe that the corporate plan has been completed to high professional standards, providing the level of detail and analytical framework that would be expected from a large listed public entity evaluating an investment opportunity of scale.”

    “Based on our preliminary review, as more fully described in our report, and subject to the assumptions contained in the corporate plan itself, Greenhill Caliburn believes that, taken as a whole, the corporate plan for the development of the NBN is reasonable,” it added.

    Communications Minister Stephen Conroy immediately hailed the advisory firm’s approval as vindicating NBN Co’s plan; noting that it confirmed NBN Co’s key assumptions. And the Minister appeared to highlight his Government’s commitment to transparency as demonstrated by the report. “We’ve released the Corporate Plan and now we’re releasing the Executive Summary of Greenhill Caliburn’s independent assessment of NBN Co’s work,” he said, “mindful that the complete document deals with sensitive, commercial-in-confidence material.”

    Greenhill Caliburn’s document did, however, contain a number of caveats about the NBN project. For example, it pointed out that the NBN’s successful implementation and financial forecast were subject to a number of “risks, contingencies and external factors” – such as shifting technologies and consumer preferences, and that there was a lack of “directly comparable precedents globally for the NBN”.

    And the ever-present wireless debate also raised its head in Greenhill Caliburn’s report.

    “Trends towards ‘mobile-centric’ broadband networks could also have significant long-term implications for NBN Co’s fibre offerings, to the extent that some consumers may be willing to sacrifice higher speed fibre transmissions for the convenience of mobile platforms,” the firm wrote. “… the prevalence of such [wireless-only] homes should be carefully monitored in connection with ongoing performance management efforts.”

    In addition, Greenhill Caliburn also had concerns around the pricing of future products based on the NBN, noting that consumers might push back against a usage-based pricing model, that lower prices might need to be set initially to encourage higher take-up rates, and that retail service provider margins on entry-level NBN services might combine with lower-than-expected growth in premium services such as internet delivered television.

    To address these and other risks, the firm recommended close monitoring of the project as a whole – especially the migration period where Telstra customers will be shifted onto the NBN, and an ongoing review policy which would see annual, quarterly and ‘event-based’ ad-hoc reporting established to the Government, and an “investment committee” established within the Government to keep an eye on things.

    “As with any infrastructure project, there are always risks, contingencies and external factors and the Government will work closely with NBN Co to put in place agreed performance indicators to track its performance and adjust strategies or operations as needed,” said Conroy in his statement.

    Image credit: Dominik Gwarek, royalty free

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Posted 14/02/2011 at 1:29 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Comment storm in 5…..4…..3…..2…..1….cue in!

      • Posted 14/02/2011 at 2:32 pm | Permalink | Reply

        Storms aren’t good, in storms NBN Co’s cables will fall off the polls… :P

        • Posted 14/02/2011 at 2:42 pm | Permalink | Reply

          No, it’s gravity and the poles fault. If it wasn’t for gravity, they’d stay up.

    2. Posted 14/02/2011 at 3:35 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Annnnnnnnnnnnd…in steps The Australian:


    3. Jay Z
      Posted 14/02/2011 at 4:33 pm | Permalink | Reply

      hahaha isn’t it funny? Out comes some positive evidence on the NBN yet trust The Australian to start scouring for any anti-NBN propaganda it can muster from it, ignore the positive and write an article condemning the NBN…

      and people read that sad excuse for a media outlet…

    4. midcoast
      Posted 14/02/2011 at 5:50 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I bet if the Australian was all for the nbn it would be the greatest paper on the planet.
      The only reason the paper is a hack is simply because it puts a god case on why the NBN is just another white elephant done by Labor

      • Posted 14/02/2011 at 6:09 pm | Permalink | Reply


        If The Australian was an impartial “reporter” of news, instead of “twister” of news, whether the NBN is “good” or “bad” still wouldn’t matter.

        When a news outlet writes off editorial stance as factual reporting – (as the Oz does with many subjects) – they lose credibility in many people’s eyes.

        • Simon Reidy
          Posted 14/02/2011 at 7:15 pm | Permalink | Reply

          Exactly. Unfortunately what would once have been called an editorial or opinion piece (at least Renai understands this concept :)) now gets passed off as “news” by The Australian. The fact that they have turned a positive report for the government into a negative one, by picking out selective bits of information to suit their needs (cherry pick much?) is so blatantly obvious it makes me want to puke.

          If they were a good media outlet, rather than a coalition propaganda machine, they would get both sides to the story (a concept real journalists have understood for hundreds of years) and let the reader make an informed decision about the pros and cons of any given government project. They dont even try to hide their hatred for the NBN, where as anyone that actually knows the facts about the NBN and/or works in the industry, knows its going to be a solid government investment, an awesome thing for every area of the IT industry, and indirectly improve areas of all of our lives in countless ways.

        • Jackey J
          Posted 15/02/2011 at 1:48 am | Permalink | Reply

          Hardly a ringing endorsement though given ‘Reasonable’ is the term used, especially in response to the NBNCo ‘assumptions’.

          There are a lot of weasel words and caveats in the Exec Summary which allows it to be used as ammunition against the NBN. It is easy to see how parts of the report can be picked up and run in isolation to reflect badly on the process.

          eg: Disclaimer:

          We have assumed and relied upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of
          the information publicly available, supplied or otherwise made available to us by the Commonwealth and NBN Co and its advisers, and have further relied upon the assurances of the representatives of the
          Commonwealth and NBN Co and its advisers that they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that
          would make such information inaccurate or misleading.

          • Posted 15/02/2011 at 6:25 am | Permalink | Reply

            Not sure how that relates to The Australian and its misleading reporting of the NBN, but anyway.

            The report (and business plan) was written under the assumption that Telstra wouldn’t participate in the construction of the network. Now that Telstra’s participation is not much more than a formality away from 100% confirmation, the business plan is greatly solidified.

            With a decommissioned copper network, uptake figures – (measured at around the 65% mark in all reporting so far) – surges beyond 100%.

            • Jackey J
              Posted 15/02/2011 at 10:46 am | Permalink | Reply

              I guess the point I am trying to make is that the NBN is a victim of its own secrecy. This ‘Independent report’ (I use the term only in reference to the fact that NBNCo did not write it) was based only on the information that the Governement and the NBNCo gave it. The following is a passage from the Buisness Spectator which reasonates with me.

              “The review’s significance shouldn’t be over-stated – it is an opinion on the reasonableness of someone else’s opinions, not any kind of guarantee that the myriad of assumptions that under-pin the corporate plan will be proven correct with hindsight – but there was another element of the report that is worthwhile.”


              With that in mind you have 3 articles on the report, with 3 different news agencies, coming to 3 different conclusions.

              The Australian : Report shows NBN fails to consider the impact of wireless, which it does.
              Delimiter: Caliburn rubber-stamps NBN business case, with a picture of an Excellent tick?
              Business Spectator: somewhere in between.

              My view is the report was a waste of time as it was always going to show that the NBNCo was going to that NBNCo plan and assumptions were sound. Barring a gross micalculation, aka Liberals last election.

              Build the thing and it will live or die on its own merits through the election cycles.

              • Posted 15/02/2011 at 12:10 pm | Permalink | Reply

                I agree the report was a waste of time; these things aren’t produced unless they are going to show more or less what the person commissioning them wants to be shown. I’ve reported on too many consultant reports produced for Government to have any other view of them.

    Leave a Comment


  • Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

    Follow us on social media

    Use your RSS reader to subscribe to our articles feed or to our comments feed.

  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights