• Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • News - Written by on Tuesday, October 5, 2010 7:08 - 13 Comments

    Conroy to receive secret filter forum report

    The Greens have dug up a handful of further details about Labor’s controversial mandatory filter project through the questions on notice procedure, including the fact that Communications Minister Stephen Conroy will shortly receive a report on a confidential online forum held by his department on the topic in April this year.

    The revelation of the forum’s existence caused a furore in late April, as the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy was using it to discuss sensitive matters around the filter project, including the possibility of making it an offence to promote methods of circumventing the technology – despite the fact that Conroy’s office has explicitly stated it would not be an offence to bypass the filter.

    But in a response to questions put in parliament by Greens Communications Spokesperson Scott Ludlam, the Government said ISPs participating in the forum from 12 to 23 April were not required to sign non-disclosure agreements to take part.

    “The department is preparing a report to the Minister on the forum. A decision on the public release of the report will be made by the Minister after he has received a copy of the report,” the statement said.

    The Government also revealed that depending on the individual circumstances of the case involved, unauthorised distribution of the secret blacklist of banned web addresses might constitute a criminal offence. The list of “Refused Classification” sites appears to already have been leaked once already to Wikileaks.

    However, the Government confirmed that the Australian Federal Police had stopped its investigation into the leak in 2009.

    Further Greens questions dealt with the questions of whether certain organisations would be exempt from being filtered, and whether the filter service would affect Australians travelling overseas and using a mobile device to access the internet through a local telco – a technique commonly known as roaming.

    “Provision will be made for organisations with a legitimate work requirement to access an unfiltered service. This will apply to organisations such as law enforcement and the Australian Communications and Media Authority,” the Government responded.

    And it confirmed that most Australians roaming overseas would be filtered because in the end, their connections would go though a network in Australia.

    Finally, Ludlam questioned how many of the 435 web addresses on the blacklist at the time of questioning were sites, rather than individual URLs.

    “At 30 April 2010, the ACMA’s list of URLs maintained pursuant to the requirements of Schedule 5 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 contained 435 individual URLs relating to online child sexual abuse material,” was the response. “These URLs belonged to 338 different internet domains or sites.”

    The news comes as most in Australia’s technology sector consider the filter project dead and buried, with both the Greens and the Coalition planning to oppose any legislation that the Gillard Government introduces into Parliament to implement its policy, meaning the legislation is unlikely to have the numbers to proceed. However, the Australian Sex Party has warned the Coalition’s opposition to the plan may not be as solid as many have assumed.

    Image credit: Hugo Humberto Plácido da Silva, royalty free

    submit to reddit

    13 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. None
      Posted 05/10/2010 at 11:26 am | Permalink |

      > ” making it an offence to promote methods of circumventing the technology”

      Moving to China is sounding more attractive all the time.

      • Posted 05/10/2010 at 11:08 pm | Permalink |

        I hear they like to drink even more than Australians do. And they have great noodles!

    2. Blamer ..
      Posted 05/10/2010 at 1:09 pm | Permalink |

      Are those the spectacles from The Transformers movie? Look closely at the lens and they may reveal the secret location of Conroy’s confidential filter report.

      • Posted 05/10/2010 at 11:09 pm | Permalink |

        Dammit. I was hoping you were going to say something about Megan Fox.

    3. John Turner
      Posted 05/10/2010 at 1:19 pm | Permalink |

      How Conjob ever got re-elected is beyond me. This stupid filter rubbish needs to be burried, once and for all!

      • Posted 05/10/2010 at 11:10 pm | Permalink |

        I think Scott Ludlam and Joe Hockey have a plan for that. Stay tuned.

    4. Posted 05/10/2010 at 1:32 pm | Permalink |

      >The list of “Refused Classification” sites appears to already have been leaked once already to Wikileaks.

      that list was the complete ACMA “Prohibited/Potentially Prohibited” list, not just RC.

      • Posted 05/10/2010 at 11:13 pm | Permalink |

        You’re right — but the sentence is still semantically correct. It was a super-set of the list.

    5. Barry
      Posted 05/10/2010 at 1:51 pm | Permalink |

      I knew it, Conroy’s intention is control.. not saving the kids… With all these resources wouldn’t it make more sense to go after the sites and take them down instead of trying to stop an entire country from accidentally stumbling across it. I am curious about how often this material would be inadvertently accessed anyway, in my 20 years of internet usage, even when looking for adult material I have never come across any!

    6. Hades
      Posted 05/10/2010 at 5:43 pm | Permalink |

      “And it confirmed that most Australians roaming overseas would be filtered because in the end, their connections would go though a network in Australia.”

      What?

      Pretty sure if I am roaming overseas, my connection never touches an Australian network. Unless, of course, the site I am browsing is located in Australia.

      • Posted 05/10/2010 at 11:12 pm | Permalink |

        Actually, I think if you’re roaming, your data would eventually head back through your home telco’s network. This would make a lot of sense on many levels.




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights