• Catch issues early, fix them fast – Free trial


    [ad] With GFI Cloud you can easily manage and secure your remote workforce – wherever they are, from wherever you are! The simple IT management platform includes patch management, antivirus, web protection, monitoring and remote control. Get the benefit of endpoint protection with the ease of central management. Start a free trial now.


  • Great articles on other sites
  • RSS Great articles on other sites

  • News - Written by on Monday, September 6, 2010 12:15 - 6 Comments

    Court extends ban on PS3 modchip sales

    Australia’s Federal Court has extended a ban on a handful of local retailers selling or importing hardware — commonly known as ‘mod chips’ — that allows unauthorised software to run on Sony’s PlayStation 3.

    The court in late August had initiated the ban — with a temporary cessation date of 31 August — while court action initiated by Sony Computer Entertainment’s Australian and European arms against three local retailers goes ahead. The action stemmed from the retailers’ importation and advertisement for sale of the PS Jailbreak device — a USB key which defeats Sony’s protection on the PlayStation 3.

    According to court documents filed late last week, the Australian retailers banned from selling the device are OzModChips and an individual who appears to be involved with the business — Ryan Caruana, Global Solutions International (trading as Quantronics) and Ken Tolcher (trading as Mod Supplier).

    However, after further court action last week, Justice Dodds-Streeton, according to court documents posted online, extended the ban indefinitely. It is believed the ban may apply to other retailers not named in the suit — due to the use of the ‘Jane Doe’ and ‘John Doe’ terminology — may also be prohibited from selling the mod chip until the case is resolved.

    The retailers are prohibited from importing the PS Jailbreak device, according to Dodds-Streeton’s order, distributing it, offering it to the public, providing it to another person, or otherwise dealing in the device.

    Furthermore, the retailers have been ordered to give what stock they have of the modchip — or what stock may arrive as a result of prior orders — to Sony, who will hold the devices until further court order.

    As of today, OzModChips.com is still advertising the product (although the site has a “sold out” logo on it. But it does not appear that the other two retailers have the device listed any more. Delimiter has been unable to contact any of the retailers for further information on the matter.

    According to a lawyer who defended a client against Nintendo in a similar case earlier this year, the Sony case could be just the first of many gaming giant-initiated cases in Australia on the issue of mod chips.

    “If history is anything to go by, I envisage many more cases to be settled in favour of the gaming giants before a court is given a proper chance to consider and decide on these highly contentious matters,” said Berrigan Doube director John Cheng last week. “It will take an extraordinary person to really take the fight to the gaming console companies due to the significant resources required and the personal risks attached to defending the allegations raised against them.”

    But one of the defendants, OzModChips, has vowed to fight the case, in a public statement that has since been removed from its website.

    Image credit: włodi, Creative Commons

    submit to reddit

    6 Comments

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    1. Rob
      Posted 06/09/2010 at 12:49 pm | Permalink |

      Why will it take an “extraordinary person”?

      Does our system of justice not offer everyone equality before the law? Or, is the only justice we get, that which we can afford?

      It really sucks that huge corporatiopns can steamroll the little people.

      In practical terms, where is the justice…???

      • Posted 06/09/2010 at 9:03 pm | Permalink |

        It’s essentially a terrific gamble. If you throw down a wad of cash for a great law firm to represent you, you can take on Sony. Then if you win, you get all your money back and probably then some. If you lose, you don’t just pay your own legal costs, you probably pay Sony’s and then some.

        It’s like playing high stakes poker … with your mortgage ;)

    2. Tobias
      Posted 06/09/2010 at 4:57 pm | Permalink |

      Will be very unfortunate if the court continues to suport Sony. Australians already pay a far higher retail price for video games than other countries such as the United States, and frequently get games up to a year late, if at all. A victory against modchips would be a huge defeat for Australians that want to retain the freedom to import games and other media.

      • Posted 06/09/2010 at 9:04 pm | Permalink |

        The thing that I don’t quite understand is I thought we already had this victory in the High Court against Sony … did some politician go and make a law that made it redundant? ;)

    3. Posted 06/09/2010 at 7:53 pm | Permalink |

      Sure, everyone is equal under the law, so long as you can afford the top-notch barristers to get the justice you require. Sony and Nintendo have virtually unlimited financial resources to throw at barristers and solicitors. Smaller companies cannot afford it.

      Let me give you an example from first hand experience on trying to run an intellectual property claim case. To get a single deposition, have the QC and junior Barrister find the attack vector in the copyright and contracts law and our solicitors working with them providing background, it cost over $125k for ONE MONTH and that was just to file an injunction with the Supreme Court of NSW. It never even got that far as the other side buckled when their two week defense bill hit $100k and an out of court agreement was reached. By the time contract amendments were made, that month saw both companies spend combined spend over $250k and not spend a day in court.

      We were told in that case, which was two smallish companies to prepare to spend $5m over three years if we wanted to fight it out. Not to mention, if you lose you’ll probably get touched up for costs (not all but some). So now budget for $8m because you don’t know the outcome – no matter how clear the copyright law is, the judges on the benches are predominantly old men who have no idea about technology so you can’t even begin to guess how they’ll rule. That was told to me by the best IP QC in the country.

      In a case like this, Sony or Nintendo could easily drop $10-12m over three years and not even blink – what about OzModChips? So unless some white knight barrister steps up to work the case for free as a challenge, good luck.

      Here’s a good PDF on gaming copyright: http://www.copyright.org.au/pdf/acc/infosheets_pdf/g016.pdf

      • Posted 06/09/2010 at 9:06 pm | Permalink |

        Jesus Christ. Someone had better call Dick Smith to step in.




    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:


  • Most Popular Content

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds — AustralianSuper, CBus, HESTA and more — is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, as was revealed in November, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well, and the Financial Review last week reported that Superpartners is actually close to turfing it altogether and going back to the drawing board.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT


    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications


    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry


    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights