Windows InTune trial
Delicious/delimiterau
- Nokia skips Australia in Symbian Belle roll-out
- Aussies set to 'shake up' Silicon Valley with StartupHouse
- Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE expected to launch on Telstra in late Feb to early March
- Rumour: Telstra to launch Galaxy S II 4G and Galaxy Note in the near future
- Meet Westpac’s new technology leaders
- Start-up pipeline: new lab for Aussie ideas
- Privacy chief probes Google
- Suncorp rules out outsourced IT as customers go online
- Peak provider aspiring to grow iiNet's reach
- Conroy may act following Optus court win
Opinion - Written by Renai LeMay on Wednesday, April 7, 2010 13:32 - 1 Comment
Conroy is right to question Google’s privacy record
Google should not expect to be beyond international criticism while it offers the US Government access to its data on request but lambasts other governments for interfering with the rights of online users.
Read the full story by Brett Winterford at iTnews
Related posts:
1 Comment
Leave a Comment
Analysis, Enterprise IT, Featured - Feb 9, 2012 17:32 - 0 Comments
Macquarie opens kimono on IT operations
More In Enterprise IT
- ERP disaster costs Ansell millions
- Former US Govt CIO in Aussie speaking tour
- More major IT contracts up for grabs in SA
- Xero raises $15m, makes acquisition
- Defence hasn’t tested IBM contract since 1999
News, Telecommunications - Feb 9, 2012 14:52 - 11 Comments
Telstra in mobile: Making out like a bandit
More In Telecommunications
- Exetel cuts NBN prices, limits quota to 150GB
- Internode to migrate customers to iiNet DSLAMs
- NBN Co inks $620m satellite deal
- Coalition missteps on NBN budget savings
- Why NBN prices will be higher (by Malcolm Turnbull)
Gadgets, News - Feb 9, 2012 10:08 - 0 Comments
New LG PRADA Android phone hits Vodafone
More In Gadgets
- HBO to invest $10 million in Quickflix
- AFL rights: Optus, Telstra in a techno-legal time warp
- Who owns footy rights? Optus web copyright victory explained
- WA Govt trials iPads in schools
- TV Now: Why the AFL should be grateful












OK. Here’s the thing: While Conroy does have a point about Google allowing authorities access to their users data, it has NOTHING to do with the proposed internet filter. NOTHING. It’s a totally separate issue.
It’s a separate issue because;
A) Google is a company that provides a service and you are under no obligation to use it. It’s completely opt-in and, as an informed consumer, it’s your responsibility to make yourself aware of the practices of any company you choose to do business with.
B) WTF does Google’s allowing governments (with court-approved warrants and subpoenas) access to their own data have to do with our government wanting to censor the entire internet?
Once again Conroy is showing his complete ignorance of how things work in an industry that he’s supposedly responsible for in this country.