• The Frustrated State: How terrible tech policy is deterring digital Australia

    Written by Delimiter's Renai LeMay, The Frustrated State will be the first in-depth book examining of how Australia’s political sector is systematically mismanaging technological change. Click here to help fund it on Kickstarter.

  • No Brother: Science fiction, martial arts & Australia's darkest city

    Set in Australia's darkest city, No Brother is a vision of a future where martial arts discipline intersects with power, youth and radical technological change. It is the first novel by Delimiter's Renai LeMay. Click here to help fund it on Kickstarter.

  • Featured, News - Written by on Thursday, February 4, 2010 9:51 - 25 Comments

    iiNet wins video piracy trial

    Update: A comprehensive overview of the judgement can be found here.

    Australian ISP iiNet was today announced as the victor in its long-running defence against a lawsuit by major film and TV studios represented by the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT).

    Justice Cowdroy announced the verdict to a packed courtroom in Sydney today.

    The studios first dragged iiNet into the Federal Court back in November 2008, arguing that the ISP infinged copyright by failing to take reasonable steps — including enforcing its own terms and conditions — to prevent customers copying films and TV shows over its network.

    iiNet CEO Michael Malone (pictured) was among many to take the witness stand at the trial.

    The action was filed by Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Disney Enterprises and the Seven Network (Australian licensee of some of the infringed works).

    The trial has been viewed by Australia’s ISP industry as a major landmark case to help determine how ISPs will react in future to users using their networks to download copyrighted material. iiNet had not been forwarding email communication from AFACT to users who AFACT had alleged had breached copyright, whereas some other ISPs have been complying with the request.

    More information on the verdict to follow.

    Image credit: iiNet

    submit to reddit


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

    1. Posted 04/02/2010 at 8:59 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Hell yea!

      about time the movie/music industry get told to do their own damn work. yes this will be appealed etc, but iinet now have the momentum and it will be harder for afact to overturn this.

      one big clear message to all the US film studio's: do your own damn dirty work we will not be your puppets!

    2. Jon
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 9:12 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Congrats iiNet!!!

      • Posted 04/02/2010 at 9:17 pm | Permalink | Reply

        Great news, congratulations!

        • Peter
          Posted 04/02/2010 at 9:37 pm | Permalink | Reply

          great news. Between this and iinet's opposition to Conroy's stupid filter, iinet has a customer in me for life. I'd rather pay slightly more for slightly less bandwidth to be with a reliable company that actually cares about its customers and stands up to money grubbing industry dickheads. Those ISPs that support filtering and cave to the **IA can go to hell.

    3. Jan
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 9:22 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Three cheers for Justice Cowdroy for making the correct decision.

    4. Michael
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 9:39 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Common sense prevails. The Sooner the Film industry embraces New technology and looks for ways to leverage off it the better. They just waste their money and the Courts time with actions such as those just completed

      • Andy
        Posted 04/02/2010 at 10:12 pm | Permalink | Reply

        Finally, some sort of real result coming out of our legal system. Common sense prevails

      • Unimpressed (sic)
        Posted 05/02/2010 at 9:12 am | Permalink | Reply

        Unimpressed, you are a tad recalcitrant as its a no brainer what IINET won,

        I main deal is, you cant disconnect someone without first due process.

    5. Peter
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 10:13 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I am thrilled to hear this. Truely a win for common sense. And another loss for those who abuse what the copyright system is there for. Good to see democracy working as it should tho these "trolls" should never get to court in the first place.

    6. Peter
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 10:27 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Unimpressed, Why does iinet have to take up the financial burdon of investigating it's users when it has no responsibility to enforce the copyrights of others? (who I might add, can very easily afford to enforce there own, its there copyrights so its there job yes?) What has AFACT done to help other than sue the pants off them and loose? Why does the public hate AFACT and give them zero support?

    7. Mark
      Posted 05/02/2010 at 12:45 am | Permalink | Reply

      This is a good day for civil rights and freedom of the Internet. How refreshing to see a courageous and independent judgment by Cowdroy against the might of Hollywood giants. While I understand the film and music industry's torment, I have no sympathy for their tactics and for holding a small ISP to ransom in an uneven legal battle.

      Perhaps this can serve as yet another wake up call to those (including Conroy and the Rudd government) that still dream of controlling the Internet and wish to curb its potential as the most effective tool to enforce civil liberties and protect democracy in 21st century.

      • Rod
        Posted 05/02/2010 at 4:06 am | Permalink | Reply

        I suspect that Unimpressed is a film industry plant. Probably in PR. Get a real job!

    8. jason andrade
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 8:58 pm | Permalink | Reply

      hurray for common sense and well done iinet and michael malone for sticking to your principles.


    9. Mark
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 9:22 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Congratulations to iiNet and their financial and legal supporters. I hope them yanks leave us alone now. The yanks should've starting this action against THEIR ISPs and not someone else's.

    10. Max
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 9:45 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I know this is only the first battle, but I'm extremely happy with the outcome so far.

      The film studios need to realise there is already a process for filing copyright complaints against those who share illegal material – and that it's there to protect privacy and uphold the ideal of innocent until proven guilty.

      If they want to prosecute people then they can do it properly and legally like everyone else has to.

    11. Xrodent
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 9:55 pm | Permalink | Reply

      A great result, certainly not what I expected. Next step towards Net Neutrality is to destroy this FAIL firewall the Australian LABOUR Government is trying to impose!

    12. Unimpressed
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 10:12 pm | Permalink | Reply

      What the issue was IINET was not following Complaints made by AFACT.

      If a complaint has been made IINET must then investigate and then take action. IINET was in my opinion condoning its users to ignore Copyright Law.

      All I hope now AFACT instead of making this complaint direct to IINET, NOW I can see AFACT will not take direct Action though in fact get the federal Police Involved for Every Complaint as they have more authority over IINET.

      Federal Police will be able to trace data from Illegal Sites and if traced back to IINET servers I hope they go and pull all IINET DNS Servers to get the information.

      Its similar to Child Porn Sites. Police can trace who went to a particular site and downloaded the offending position.

      ALL i can say is this will be appealed.

    13. Harry
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 10:13 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Yes, common sense at last. The film industry getting too powerful. Too rich, ridiculously rich.

    14. Nakerjack
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 10:21 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Unimpressed = DO you work for AFACT? Typical response from someone who really has no idea on the law, privacy policies, etc.

      one UNIMPRESSED idiot is just that – ONE lonely one!

    15. Paul
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 10:22 pm | Permalink | Reply

      That's bloody awesome!

      As a long term iiNet user (and having once worked there at the turn of the century) I was worried, not that iiNet were in the right, but that J. Cowdrey would just not "get it".

      iiNet is a great company that is a leader in promoting the good side of the Internet. They're a founding member of the Western Australian Internet Association (Inc.) and almost single-handedly developed the WA Internet eXchange network.

      They have a sound understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility and actually do it. iiNet is a good corporate and Internet "citizen".

    16. Greg
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 10:27 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Amazing result – WELL DONE!! (Judge – your awesome!)

    17. Jimbob
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 10:37 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Unimpressed – why dont AFACT sue Australia Post, as people are sure to send DVD/HDD through the post. Hell why we're at it why not sue Car/Turck Manufacturers for producing a means to deliver said mail.

      Hell why not sure the electricity suppliers for supplying the electricity that made the copying possible in the first place.

      Unimpressed – NOT US!! (That is the MAJORITY)

    18. Rod
      Posted 04/02/2010 at 11:54 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Great news for iinet !

      The action was stupid – it's like holding car manufactuers responsible for f-wit hoon drivers.

      A victory for common sense, ever diminishing in the modern world.

    19. Posted 05/02/2010 at 12:15 am | Permalink | Reply

      Excellent! I had a feeling when I met some iinet reps back at the technology show before they were fulling migrated and established in NSW that they were of decent and intelligent forward thinking technologists.

      I'm also proud for them, that they didn't stand down and be bullied by the corporations attempting to bend the laws of privacy to meet their continually incrementing profits.

      iiNet, you have made the right decision and you are now part of Australian tech and law history forever.

    20. Myke
      Posted 05/02/2010 at 4:17 am | Permalink | Reply


    Leave a Comment


    Get our 'Best of the Week' newsletter on Fridays

    Just the most important stories, one email a week.

    Email address:

  • Enterprise IT stories

    • Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp facepalm2

      If you have even a skin deep awareness of the structure of Australia’s superannuation industry, you’ll be aware that much of the underlying infrastructure used by many of the nation’s major funds is provided by a centralised group, Superpartners. One of the group’s main projects in recent years has been to dramatically update and modernise its IT platform — its version of a core banking platform overhaul. Unfortunately, the $250 million project has not precisely been going well.

    • Qld’s Grant joins analyst firm IBRS peter-grant

      This week it emerged that Peter Grant, the two-time former Queensland Whole of Government CIO (pictured), has joined well-regarded analyst firm Intelligent Business Research Services (IBRS). We’ve long had a high regard for IBRS, and so it’s fantastic to see such an experienced executive join its ranks.

    • Westpac dumps desk phones for Samsung Android mobiles samsung-galaxy-ace-3

      The era of troublesome desk phones tied to physical locations is gradually coming to an end in many workplaces, with mobile phones becoming increasingly popular as organisations’ main method of voice telecommunications. But some groups are more advanced than others when it comes to adoption of the trend. One of those is Westpac.

    • Ministers’ cloud approval lasted just a year reverse

      Remember how twelve months ago, the Federal Government released a new cloud computing security and privacy directive which required departments and agencies to explicitly acquire the approval of the Attorney-General and the relevant portfolio minister before government data containing private information could be stored in offshore facilities? Remember how the policy was strongly criticised by Microsoft, Government CIOs and Delimiter? Well, it looks like the policy is about to be reversed.

    • WA Govt can’t fund school IT upgrades oops key

      In news from The Department of Disturbing Facts, iTNews revealed late last week that Western Australia’s Department of Education has run out of money halfway through the deployment of new fundamental IT infrastructure to the state’s schools.

    • Turnbull outlines Govt ICT vision turnbull-5

      Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has published an extensive article arguing that the Federal Government needed to do a better job of connecting with Australians via digital channels and that public sector IT projects needn’t cost the huge amounts that some have in the past.

    • NZ Govt pushes hard into cloud zealand

      New Zealand’s national Government announced a whole of government contract this morning for what it terms ‘Office Productivity as a Service’ services. This includes email and calendaring services, as well as file-sharing, mobility, instant messaging and collaboration services. The contract complements two existing contracts — Desktop as a Service and Enterprise Content Management as a Service.

    • CommBank reveals Harte’s replacement whiteing

      The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has promoted an internal executive who joined the bank in September after a lengthy career at petroleum giant VP and IT services group Accenture to replace its outgoing chief information officer Michael Harte, who announced in early May that he would leave the bank.

    • Jeff Smith quits Suncorp for IBM jeffsmith4

      Second-tier Australian bank and financial services group Suncorp today announced that its long-serving top technology executive Jeff Smith would leave to take up a senior role with IBM in the United States, in an announcement which marks the end of an era for the nation’s banking IT sector.

    • Small business missing the mobile, social, cloud revolution iphone-stock

      Most companies that live and breathe the online revolution are not tech startups, but smart smaller firms that use online tools to run their core business better: to cut costs, reach customers and suppliers, innovate and get more control. Many others, however, are falling behind, according to a new Grattan Institute discussion paper.

  • Blog, Enterprise IT - Jul 5, 2014 13:53 - 0 Comments

    Super funds close to dumping $250m IT revamp

    More In Enterprise IT

    Blog, Telecommunications - Jul 5, 2014 12:12 - 0 Comments

    What should the ACCC’s role be in guiding infrastructure spending?

    More In Telecommunications

    Analysis, Industry, Internet - Jun 23, 2014 10:33 - 0 Comments

    ‘Google Schmoogle’ – how Yellow Pages got it so wrong

    More In Industry

    Blog, Digital Rights - Jun 30, 2014 22:24 - 0 Comments

    Will Netflix launch in Australia, or not?

    More In Digital Rights