<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qantas ditches Lotus for Outlook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://delimiter.com.au/2010/02/02/qantas-ditches-lotus-for-outlook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2010/02/02/qantas-ditches-lotus-for-outlook/</link>
	<description>Just Australia. Just technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Bollard</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2010/02/02/qantas-ditches-lotus-for-outlook/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Bollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=551#comment-150</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re only using Notes for mail, then I can see the sense in swapping it out.  Of course, I can&#039;t see why you&#039;d move to outlook when there&#039;s some perfectly good cloud computing platforms out there, like Gmail.  Google&#039;s mail offering is better suited to an on-the-move international organisation.

In any case, had they remained on Notes/Domino, they still could have consolidated their databases and cut costs by $100 million.  It&#039;s the business and procedural changes, rather than the system branding changes which are behind the cost recovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re only using Notes for mail, then I can see the sense in swapping it out.  Of course, I can&#8217;t see why you&#8217;d move to outlook when there&#8217;s some perfectly good cloud computing platforms out there, like Gmail.  Google&#8217;s mail offering is better suited to an on-the-move international organisation.</p>
<p>In any case, had they remained on Notes/Domino, they still could have consolidated their databases and cut costs by $100 million.  It&#8217;s the business and procedural changes, rather than the system branding changes which are behind the cost recovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renai LeMay</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2010/02/02/qantas-ditches-lotus-for-outlook/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Renai LeMay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=551#comment-144</guid>
		<description>I dunno Jason, other Microsoft software maybe, but I reckon Microsoft has a bajillion percent penetration of the corporate email market these days.

They are still swapping out Lotus Notes and Novell Groupwise everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno Jason, other Microsoft software maybe, but I reckon Microsoft has a bajillion percent penetration of the corporate email market these days.</p>
<p>They are still swapping out Lotus Notes and Novell Groupwise everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Cartwright</title>
		<link>http://delimiter.com.au/2010/02/02/qantas-ditches-lotus-for-outlook/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cartwright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delimiter.com.au/?p=551#comment-142</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a big win for Microsoft, most stories we hear of these days are about companies moving away from Microsoft software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a big win for Microsoft, most stories we hear of these days are about companies moving away from Microsoft software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
